Oh Richard.
See what I said further down the thread, about how many of us are mums and recognise patterns of behaviour?
Like I said before,
- your publicly available spat over Leeds WPUK LCC fiasco
- your 'he said/she said' changing stories,
- your they did it, it wasn't me, they staged it all probably'
- and now your 'we'd already won, that's why we didn't go'
is sooo reminiscent of handling younger children when they're trying to backtrack to drawing on the wall, pooing in the garden, or pulling someone's hair.
Your latest post sounds like someone in Bristol has had a bit of a 'parent to child' chat with you, and you're now at the stage of it wasn't me at all, I was just standing on the sidelines, accidentally slipped and fell with my fist out.
I'm less interested in your 'beef' with WPUK - more interested in your 'beef' against women and girls rights vs trans demands for privileges that trample over those women's and girl's rights.
If transwomen are 'women' and therefore just, well, women, you seem extremely quiet on your campaiging for women.
Just passionate about transwomen.
Who we should all accept are apparently women. So shouldn't need additional campaigning for over and above women's campaigns, because they are, just, women.
Or maybe they're not?