And the reason that the "woman" committed the assaults was because of transphobia, apparently. Of course.
Another account.
www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/jayde-clowting-trial-bristol-court-3332736
"It was shortly after this alleged incident that a fight broke out on the dancefloor, a fight which was started when Clowting's friend Lana Stancer - known as LJ - palmed the complainant's boyfriend in the face, the court heard.
"Defence barrister Sarah Regan pointed out to the victim under cross-examination that in his first two statements to police he said Lana Stancer was the person who assaulted him and was on top of him before bar staff broke them up.
Miss Regan said: "I am going to suggest you didn't mention female one [Jayde Clowting] because she didn't assault you, did she?"
Both Clowting and Stancer are males who identify as women. Both were involved in the assault.
So here we have the defence lawyer stating that only one of the attackers is female (when neither of them is) and as the victim did not identify the "female" one correctly, then the victim's evidence should not be relied upon.
I mean, what the hell?
Stancer has already been convicted of assaulting the victim's boyfriend and friend.
So that's two more violent "female" offenders for the statistics.