Ham pr disasters 40! ..the 40 by 40 anniversary edition!

[jeffgoldblum]

Still interested, still not bored!

https://apple.news/AvfCERLliSmWjTvig1I4UyA
this doesn’t sound so rosy!

implying his father and queen Elizabeth might have been together if not for Mountbatten is a particularly low flight of fancy!!!

What a lot of bs. Elizabeth never looked at another man. There were equerries and Guards officers who might be occasional escorts or dancing partners, but none of them were ever serious contenders.

Before I spam this thread any further this is my last comment for now

This was a comment she found devastating (she would later share with me that her waist shrank from 29 to 23½ inches between her engagement and her marriage).

How creepy to publish this as her brother. Very, very creepy. Yuck.

I am convinced now that Diana had ADHD, and that as part of that condition she suffered from Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria (as do I). This is an intense emotional pain in the face of others’ rejection or criticism, which amplified her wounded response to her husband’s suggestions.

Charles Spencer must be a Mumsnetter 😂

I think we have to disagree on this point @MrsLeonFarrell .

H already spoke out of pocket in Canada to a First Nations Tribe. H purports to represent his father, never overtly but covertly with a transparent veneer of plausible deniability because H "never said those exact words."

H has already insulted the UK judiciary. At a time when "two-tier justice" is a talking point leveraged by those who want to harm the UK by degrading trust in its institutions, H's insinuations that it was a stitch-up are completely out of order.

IMHO, to pretend to speak for a nation when you emphatically are a private citizen, and to maliciously attack a nation's vital institutions for delivering a fair verdict is more than sufficient grounds to remove all of H's titles.

It's almost like the 'good' old days!

The how is quite simple. Why did KC3 meet with H after H had insulted his judiciary?

Because IMO he lacks judgement, @My2cents1975

Imagine if KC3 had said no. Imagine if BP had briefed that the Duke was out of order insulting the judiciary and he has to apologise in writing and on camera before meeting the King

Pretty good ideas, though I'd be amazed if Charles had the sense to do them, but let's say he did ... how is that going to bring his idiot son to heel rather than increasing his "victimhood" to nuclear levels?
Admittedly he'd make himself look even worse, but he does that without help anyway and it still wouldn't necessarily stop him lashing out at all and sundry

Is there or was there an Ingriftus thing today ?

I must offer my apologies ladies! , I said I wasn’t interested in reading the book ..but after the extract was posted I was curious! , I wish I hadn’t read it honestly.
several posters have told me his history books are very good, however reading this I can only assume they are written differently.
the tone , the outright flights of fancy sounds like it was written by the same ghost writer who did spare! 🤷‍♀️

I agree Harry has been speaking out of turn about politics, not than once. But I believe it is rather for the government to intervene and put a stop to it, not the King.

KC3 just needs to call up Sophie C. and have a chat.

She can take a settlement for the charity and then join BP as a WAMIG (women and men in grey suits). Her job title would be "The Lord Chamberlain of “Absolutely Not”, The Lord High Refuser, and The Royal Nay-Sayer".

Give her a damehood too for the headache of dealing with the HaMs!

He really is a nasty, vindictive person. Its no wonder all they seem to attract is negativity and nothing goes right for them. Its impossible to live like that and have a happy and fulfilled life.

I've just finished reading it. I wonder how KC will feel about being called a "bellowing buffoon", and even more startling, Diana stating he was "in love with his valet"?

I agree, Jeff, this awful book is very much in the style of Spare.

@SqueakyDinosaur Much appreciated! Thank you … part 2 same time tomorrow? 😉x

The piece includes some eye widening and quite shocking claims. I’ll not repeat any in case anyone is intending to read the book!

I confess I have looked into purchasing the audio version, narrated by CS himself. I will likely do it as I will be able to listen to it during my trip to London.

Charles Spencer is an utter Cu🙄t.
Utterly. I’m sure his ex wives would agree.
Since Diana died he has made sure that he made as much £££ from her that he could. The book -which I will not be buying- is utter proof of this.
He doesn’t give a shit about Diana’s children and grandchildren -it’s all about making money and bashing the King whom he despises.
The bit in the Daily Mail that grabbed me was where he says he thinks Diana had ADHD because he does, and as a man who has been divorced three times (from women who are all double divorcees) shows his utter contempt for women. He is saying the equivalent of “I’ve been divorced three times but it’s not my fault as they are all dreadful -no man can live with them”. THAT showed me what sort of man he is.

The main people involved in this book are either dead or cannot reply.
I expect William is appalled.
I remember quite clearly watching the then Prince of Wales going to Paris -against everybody’s wishes -to collect his ex wife’s body and bring her home. He was devastated. He fought with his mother to have the Royal Standard on her coffin.
I don’t believe for a second he was as ‘giddy as a lottery winner’. Charles Spencer is a nasty liar. Why did he feel the need to write this?
From my recollection and knowledge William wanted to walk behind the coffin - and can you imagine if Harry was denied it! Harry wanted to do it because William was. Prince Philip counselled William during this time and supported him walking behind Diana. He had done it for his sister at the same age.
If the RF had stopped W & H walking behind the coffin they would be damned for that. Harry would be writing how fucked up he is because he was denied that.

One thing it has shown us -Harry is a proper Spencer isn’t he! Cashing in on the dead Princess , lying, and a nasty piece of work. Peas in a pod are Harry & Charles Spencer.

Here’s the screenshot showing the part I mean.

Here it is, it didn’t load.

I’m glad I’m not the only one who thought this ferret!

The Emanuel’s had told us this donkeys years ago because altering the dress had been very difficult! He wasn’t telling us anything new there.

How does that matter, it's creepy that he writes this in a book for £££
it's disgustingly misogynistic and objectifying coming from the brother. It's the opposite of protecting Diana's dignity - and as a man who has made a sick joke about anorexia he should shut the fuck up about shrinking waist inches of his sister. Gross. It's nasty because he is completely objectifying his sister and commodifying her eating disorder.

Swan song my arse. Horrid man.

Harry's turned up alone at the Invictus reception. Apparently, Markle can't attend as she's too busy settling the hamlets into their new life.

And too worried about being booed.

CS claiming to suffer from "rejection sensitive dysphoria" which causes him "intense emotional pain in the face of criticism" seems sadly very familiar to the kind of manipulative tactic abusive men like to use to turn themselves into the victim and minimise their responsibility for being abusive.

CS claiming to suffer from "rejection sensitive dysphoria" which causes him "intense emotional pain in the face of criticism"

Translation - doesn't like being told No.

First outing Meg has will be with hamlets. She'll use them to ensue she's not booed