Wow these threads have moved so fast I’ve hardly been able to keep up.
my two cents on a couple of bits. Firstly yes of course HAM are increasing the risk to their own kids by outing their location. Totally and utterly irresponsible considering their stated concerns. That said I simply don’t believe the risk is that high, for all they don’t stop complaining about it.
there are hundreds of high profile people in the U.K. who manage perfectly well with private security, and when was the last time we heard about a celebrity - with their own security - who was harmed?
Harry was fine with private security in the US for years, and his excuse is that they were armed. But that makes little difference in the U.K. where it’s much more difficult for a bad actor to acquire a weapon. So it’s going to make zero actual difference.
Ian Wace will have good security on his estate I’m sure.
its all a massive fuss about nothing in my opinion. I’m not saying there’s no risk, but I think it’s far lower than Harry wants it to be, and perfectly easily managed by private security and being sensible (which they are not).
I’ll never understand what these billionaires get from hosting this pair of grifters for free. Very odd behaviour.