Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Ham pr disasters 37! Will the blame remain in abeyance too?

1000 replies

jeffgoldblum · 10/09/2026 19:45

Continuing the discussion, still interested, still not bored!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
MrMarkhamsFanClub · 11/09/2026 17:10

Rhaidimiddim · 11/09/2026 15:05

Still trying to get the wi-fi working in the new house.

Yeah, those thick bullet proof walls are a bugger for blocking the WiFi

PullTheBricksDown · 11/09/2026 17:11

bluegreygreen · 11/09/2026 16:56

They have several events during the year.

The last one they held this year was in early summer, and William attended that one, hence why it was due to be Harry's turn to attend this one.

The award ceremony is only one of the events held by the Diana Award charity.

The story is the one initially broken by Charlotte Griffiths, who confirmed a day or two ago (I think the video was linked here) that the event had been cancelled. She speculated why that might have been, but said that she had not been able to confirm why independently, and was planning to do so.
I haven't seen an update from her.

No actual information to support this, but I can't help thinking that if it was Harry’s turn to host, they perhaps hoped for some form of support from him, and he didn't want have the cash to give it...

Rhaidimiddim · 11/09/2026 17:13

Mylovelygreendress · 11/09/2026 16:30

I would have thought Ian Wace preferred a lower profile .

In which case he's already been Markled. I didn't know who he was until she (allegedly) holidayed at his place in July.

CoffeeCantata · 11/09/2026 17:22

tarheelbaby · 11/09/2026 14:32

And how HAM has played the blinder!

Now that Harry's announced his 'September Schedule', it's all clear to me: He's planning to carry on like a 'working royal' until KC and PW give in and take him back in an effort to control him.
PH (and MM is she's in tow) going to all these events will make them/him a de facto working royal and will make RF's insistence that PH is NOT a working royal look ridiculous because, in fact, he will be working and doing exactly the same 'work' as the 'working royals'.

But - who’s going to pay them?

Charities don’t get charged fees and expenses by the Actual Royals!

Are you suggesting H and M will be making appearances and waffley speeches for free?

How is this going to work, tarheelbaby?

bluegreygreen · 11/09/2026 17:25

@cheezncrackers The list of engagements is being reported by the Telegraph, Sun, GB News, Independent, Hello, Page Six and Us Weekly at a quick glance.
https://archive.is/Renfk

DM is reporting as 'pseudo-royal'
https://archive.is/1KBzA

cheezncrackers · 11/09/2026 17:28

@bluegreygreen thank you! 'Official' engagements eh? Why are they official? Why aren't they just engagements or events? TBH I think the tabloid press is encouraging all this nonsense by reporting things in this way.

AcquadiP · 11/09/2026 17:32

AcrossthePond55 · 11/09/2026 16:03

Soooo, has any outlet leaked this list?

I'm curious to know what organizations/entities MM thinks are 'lofty' enough to send her dimwit husband to AND who would be willing to have him. Because I'm sure she gets final approval. I also think she won't accompany him as she will be afraid of being booed 'choose to stay with the children'.

PS I had to look up 'royal rota'. I thought it was similar to the Court Circular. But it's just some sort of media outlets clearing house. So although I expect that it made him feel very, very 'royal' and important I have a feeling that there isn't going to be a huge press pool showing up to cover these 'engagements'.

So although I expect that it made him feel very, very 'royal' and important I have a feeling that there isn't going to be a huge press pool showing up to cover these 'engagements'.

A couple of work experience kids with a pocket Canon 📸 should suffice 😂

GameSetScratch · 11/09/2026 17:34

MissMoneyFairy · 11/09/2026 09:29

He just doesn't get it, he doesn't need to announce an upcoming event, he's not there in any official capacity, they want a quiet life but only when it suits, he just wants to jump on the bandwagon and he's making a fool of himself. Other "celebs"just turn up or support charities quietly and privately.

In 2025 when other wealthy private individuals sent millions of dollars to support those affected by the L.A. Wildfires, HAM decided to become "Disaster Tourists", as so memorably described by Justine Bateman. That's why they are back in the UK: they have decided to disaster tour their own PR disaster.

P.S. I've put in my pre-order for "Spare vol. 2: The Descent Into Irrelevance".

MyGreyLurker · 11/09/2026 17:34

Ian Wace's co-founder of their hedge fund Marshall Wace is Paul Marshall. Marshall is also co-owner of GB News. Perhaps HAM see a route into GB News favour (ie to promote them) through this connection. I don't watch GB News so don't know if they're generally Sussex supporters already or not.

AlexandraCarrington · 11/09/2026 17:39

I can see why H&M might think that Wace and Marshall could be useful to them, but not why Ian Wace would want to be bothered with H&M.

WhileAutumnCrowGentlyWeeps · 11/09/2026 17:40

Rhaidimiddim · 11/09/2026 17:07

Jack Royston used to be 100% sugar.

Yep, a whole load of them ('royal reporters') were either sugars or playing to the sugar-gallery. Now they're trying to switch sides while saving face at the same time. It's all gone a bit synchonised swimming while eating plum pie and drowning in Clarkson's Cotswolds.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 11/09/2026 17:42

CoffeeCantata · 11/09/2026 17:22

But - who’s going to pay them?

Charities don’t get charged fees and expenses by the Actual Royals!

Are you suggesting H and M will be making appearances and waffley speeches for free?

How is this going to work, tarheelbaby?

If he does work for free it’ll cause a big headache for the palace. The big argument to keep the current royal family funding model is usually “but they do so much for charity”. Harry doing the same for free will be undermining that and be the counter argument in any anti royal debates.

They need him to not do this or if he is, for it to be a failure. They need the crowds to not show up, the press pack to fail to be interested. No articles about visits with clicky links to high street versions of Meghan’s posh outfits.

(for what it’s worth, I don’t think Harry would be doing this deliberately to undermine the rest of the family, I don’t think he’s that deep.)

AcrossthePond55 · 11/09/2026 17:43

MissMoneyFairy · 11/09/2026 16:59

No mention of MM attending any of his planned events or his trip back to usa 22 sept

Sooo, what about his 'visa issues' or whatever it was they said caused them to flee the US?

I'm really surprised at Bill & Hill selecting him to attend the CGI. Ah, wait a moment. One can buy tickets to the CGI 2026.

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative-september-2026-meeting/

register.cf.events/en/reg/tickets?utm_source=cf_website&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=cgi2026&utm_content=direct

And he not on the list of 'Featured Participants'.

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative-september-2026-meeting#participants/

So, did he say he was 'invited to participate' or that he 'is attending'? If the former he's not listed, if the latter It's possibly that he's buying his way in just like any member of the public.

Anything I've seen about an 'official statement' from the Clintons is on news websites. Can't find a direct link

Notmybestusername · 11/09/2026 17:48

Seraw · 11/09/2026 16:10

This is a top idea.

I know some Brownies who would follow them around for £7 an hour, talking to each other secretly through paper cups tied together with string (it would have to be after school hours, though).

I was a Brownie about 1000 years ago....we had to pledge to love God and serve the Queen

Might need to give the Brownie guides a swerve in the HAVOC role, if this is little pledge is still the case, conflicting duties etc.

BasiliskStare · 11/09/2026 17:48

Ah - thank you @bluegreygreen - it was the Australian tour , not the South African one - I stand , quite happily, corrected. I knew there was one but more than happy to be kept honest. 💐The S.A one was when M was tearily saying no one asked how she was in the context of they had visited a charity helping girls facing sexual assault and violence , and also families living far below the breadline (inter alia) . I'm not fond of the phrase because I think most normal people do , but for that occasion "check your privilege" I think would have been appropriate . It was tone deaf. I think that was picked up at the time even though they were still in their "honeymoon period".

Are not facts important as H recently clapped back 😂 My general point remains , he was preternaturally rude whilst carrying out an official engagement to people whose job was to cover that engagement. Lucky for all of us he won't , it looks like, have one of those any time soon. (Insert fingers crossed emoticon - can't find one. )

Starryfifty · 11/09/2026 17:50

cheezncrackers · 11/09/2026 17:06

But was it published? I find this incredibly tin-eared and also just petulant and rather pathetic. The King was very clear in his letter that the terms of the Sandringham Summit still stand, so is this Hazbeen's idea of a clap back? That whatever the King says, he will continue with his campaign to be seen as a working royal again and he'll pursue that agenda regardless?

It's just all a bit desperate. He left, he and Meghan got on 'the freedom flight', because everything here was just so awful for them. But the RF and the country has moved on and we neither want nor need him any more. His vicious attacks on his family and his bitter, whiny, entitled attitude regarding security that he expects us, the British taxpayers, to stump up for have permanently soured the relationship. He's no longer the cheeky young prince or the little boy walking behind his DM's coffin. He's an entitled jerk with a sharp-elbowed and narcissistic wife and we don't like or want either of them! The sooner she pisses off back to California and he goes off to live a quiet life in the shires, the better.

Tom Sykes said it on his sub stack 😀 let me try and get the clip (I hope I haven't libelled mr Sykes 😂)

AcquadiP · 11/09/2026 17:51

OhNoooooooooooooooo · 11/09/2026 16:37

I'll imagine their Duke and Duchess titles are going to go if be carries on pretending his a "public figure" and posting his schedules betc.

Ah, nothing says "I fear for my safety" more than sending out an itinerary to media organisations🤐

Starryfifty · 11/09/2026 17:51

To the PP who suggested "remove titles and throw penis squiggler into back of an ambulance " thank you 😂😂😂😂😂

KCitsweyourHammiewevecomehomenow · 11/09/2026 17:54

The Clinton foundation event has some
serious participants. Neither Harry nor Chrissy Telgen are mentioned unless their agents got them some tickets and is trying to get them on the stage somehow.

Notmybestusername · 11/09/2026 17:54

Starryfifty · 11/09/2026 17:51

To the PP who suggested "remove titles and throw penis squiggler into back of an ambulance " thank you 😂😂😂😂😂

They did. He's just Andrew now. 🙃

KilkennyCats · 11/09/2026 17:55

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 11/09/2026 17:42

If he does work for free it’ll cause a big headache for the palace. The big argument to keep the current royal family funding model is usually “but they do so much for charity”. Harry doing the same for free will be undermining that and be the counter argument in any anti royal debates.

They need him to not do this or if he is, for it to be a failure. They need the crowds to not show up, the press pack to fail to be interested. No articles about visits with clicky links to high street versions of Meghan’s posh outfits.

(for what it’s worth, I don’t think Harry would be doing this deliberately to undermine the rest of the family, I don’t think he’s that deep.)

Are you suggesting that HAM endorsing a charity rather than the RF would be the popular choice, if neither involves any costs to the charity?
I think you’re quite wrong.

MargaretThursday · 11/09/2026 17:56

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 11/09/2026 17:01

That makes two of us!

Didn't he at some point say that he'd "coordinate his diary" with the RF so they didn't do things at the same time?
I suspect this was him trying to say "I'm doing things then, so you shouldn't". Of course the RF would ignore it even if they didn't arrange things far longer in advance than this.

Notmybestusername · 11/09/2026 18:02

Rentfreeinyourhead · 11/09/2026 17:09

My point exactly. But Meghan is no Diana and I’m sure she’d love other people to refer to her as Princess Meghan.

The truncated nickname of Diana became..... Princess Di, now Meghan could be....Princess Me.

BasiliskStare · 11/09/2026 18:03

I love the idea of the HAVOC approved security detail a bit like Dad's Army .
H - Err I might have a credible threat on the phone, it's on speaker , they're saying I have PPI - is that the same as IPP, good right? - and they want to know my name to confirm .
Captain Mainwaring - Don't tell them Harry.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread