Please or to access all these features

The royal family

King Charles orders Harry and Meghan to be treated like ordinary citizens

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 07/09/2026 15:50

Apparently an order has gone out from King Charles saying that Harry and Meghan are to be treated like ordinary citizens as they are not working members of the royal family. That's according to the DM so it must be right. The thought of those two being pleased at being ordinary is too much.

I wonder just how low they will keep their profile and if it's to do with them wishing to be involved in charities. I wouldn't be surprised if they try to set up their own mock royal court.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 11:07

But why aren’t the RF paying them to go away given that they were so willing to do this for Andrew?

I’ll ignore the Andrew bit and stick to the matter at hand.

Why? Because the demands for money would never ever stop. It would be akin to dealing with blackmailers in my opinion.

And I personally would not wish to give one penny to someone who made unfounded accusations about me to the world. Nor would I be amenable to paying off people who purposely tried to destroy everything I’d worked towards.

Tell me. Would you do that if someone had done the same to you? Honestly? With the threat of continual requests for money for the rest of your life?

I’m sure I would not.

Strawberrycups764 · 08/09/2026 11:09

Daisywhatsyouranswer · 07/09/2026 17:21

Did he, Christ, then yes they are trying to br working royals . It’s utterly tragic.

they were working royals. They took a knife to it. Said they’d never return to the uk, and now here they are trying to pretend to be working royals to rebuild their brand and reputation , as it’s all they can sell. Still trying to make money off of it.

Sorry but take away the official working royal bit and the headlines will stil read,

“Prince takes sky dive for charity”

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 11:12

smilesy · 08/09/2026 10:25

Well that makes more sense, but as pp says that was when talking to Bashir, and we all know how unbiased that was 😎

And boy howdy people will just say whatever they want on here and pretend it’s fact.

Maybe it was “Elizabeth” that runs the corner shop what said it.

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 11:13

Strawberrycups764 · 08/09/2026 11:09

Sorry but take away the official working royal bit and the headlines will stil read,

“Prince takes sky dive for charity”

And so? You think they didn’t go far enough? Yinz want him to be called Just Harry?

GoldThumb · 08/09/2026 11:15

AlexandraCarrington · 07/09/2026 20:38

The King would do well to remember he is supposed to be head of the Anglican church so shouldn't he start behaving like a christian.

In what way is he not behaving like a Christian?

Exactly, sick of this rhetoric.

Forgiveness does not mean acquiescence to someone’s demands and being a walk over.
Forgiveness is powerful in the Christian faith, but it really is on the basis of the ‘forgivee’ showing true repentance. Not potentially. opening yourself wide open to be treated in the same manner again and again.

People have no idea if Charles has ‘forgiven’ Harry. He may have in a private capacity, which has zero bearing on whether you keep someone at arms length or not, or listen to their demands 🤷‍♀️

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 11:19

damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 11:07

But why aren’t the RF paying them to go away given that they were so willing to do this for Andrew?

I’ll ignore the Andrew bit and stick to the matter at hand.

Why? Because the demands for money would never ever stop. It would be akin to dealing with blackmailers in my opinion.

And I personally would not wish to give one penny to someone who made unfounded accusations about me to the world. Nor would I be amenable to paying off people who purposely tried to destroy everything I’d worked towards.

Tell me. Would you do that if someone had done the same to you? Honestly? With the threat of continual requests for money for the rest of your life?

I’m sure I would not.

Edited

Money wouldn’t do the trick, because what they want is attention.

PixieFairySprite · 08/09/2026 11:22

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 10:57

It’s because they’ve acted like assholes.

Couldn't care less as it has not and still does not affect me.

I just hope that KC can see both his sons, their families and his grandchildren.

Why do you care?

bluegreygreen · 08/09/2026 11:22

For example; I don’t mean this to be disrespectful to Charles in any way, who is entitled to privacy regarding his health, but some commentators in other countries think it’s very odd and anti-democratic, that the British public isn’t allowed to know more about the state of health of someone who occupies such an important state role and who heads an institution for which they are paying collectively £132.1 million in taxes per year.

Does it really matter what 'some commentators in other countries' think about our laws concerning medical privacy?

The King is entitled to privacy concerning his health, like anyone else in the country. If he is unwell such that he is unable to carry out his role, there are provisions in the Regency Act for that eventuality.

quartile · 08/09/2026 11:30

Anyone else think all of this shows we'd be better off as a Republic. I couldn't imagine my younger children having to bow to their older brother. It just seems anachronistic and Harry and William are victims of this. Take away the royalty bit and they'd just be rich people with a fancy house, like the former royals in countries like Germany. They still do charity work.

Daisywhatsyouranswer · 08/09/2026 11:30

bluegreygreen · 08/09/2026 11:22

For example; I don’t mean this to be disrespectful to Charles in any way, who is entitled to privacy regarding his health, but some commentators in other countries think it’s very odd and anti-democratic, that the British public isn’t allowed to know more about the state of health of someone who occupies such an important state role and who heads an institution for which they are paying collectively £132.1 million in taxes per year.

Does it really matter what 'some commentators in other countries' think about our laws concerning medical privacy?

The King is entitled to privacy concerning his health, like anyone else in the country. If he is unwell such that he is unable to carry out his role, there are provisions in the Regency Act for that eventuality.

Ageee, who cares what others think, Charles has been open about his health, and he has a right to privacy, he’s still a human being.

i find it sickening to see people baying to hear about his health and trying to make the ridiculous behaviour of his son related to it. He didn’t even tell his father he was coming back and Charles clearly isn’t at deaths door, he’s hugely active in terms of engagements.

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 11:33

PixieFairySprite · 08/09/2026 11:22

Couldn't care less as it has not and still does not affect me.

I just hope that KC can see both his sons, their families and his grandchildren.

Why do you care?

I’m pointing out the obvious. I doubt I care any more than you do, but here we both are today.

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 11:33

Daisywhatsyouranswer · 08/09/2026 11:30

Ageee, who cares what others think, Charles has been open about his health, and he has a right to privacy, he’s still a human being.

i find it sickening to see people baying to hear about his health and trying to make the ridiculous behaviour of his son related to it. He didn’t even tell his father he was coming back and Charles clearly isn’t at deaths door, he’s hugely active in terms of engagements.

Amen to that. It is sickening.

damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 11:36

PixieFairySprite · 08/09/2026 11:22

Couldn't care less as it has not and still does not affect me.

I just hope that KC can see both his sons, their families and his grandchildren.

Why do you care?

You’ve cared enough to comment so your couldn’t care less comment flies on the wind a bit.

So why do you care?

PixieFairySprite · 08/09/2026 11:37

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 11:33

I’m pointing out the obvious. I doubt I care any more than you do, but here we both are today.

What I meant was that I don't care if they have acted like assholes. It's not up to us to care or to forgive. The general public seem to dislike them for saying things that hurt the RF but it's up to the RF to forgive (or not). Not us.

I am glad if the family are on good terms.

PixieFairySprite · 08/09/2026 11:38

damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 11:36

You’ve cared enough to comment so your couldn’t care less comment flies on the wind a bit.

So why do you care?

Can you read? Did you read the whole exchange?

damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 11:39

I can read.

And I did.

So why do you care enough to post when you say you couldn’t care less?

damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 11:40

I’m only going by what you posted - not what you ‘meant’ because I can’t read minds.

smilesy · 08/09/2026 11:40

quartile · 08/09/2026 11:30

Anyone else think all of this shows we'd be better off as a Republic. I couldn't imagine my younger children having to bow to their older brother. It just seems anachronistic and Harry and William are victims of this. Take away the royalty bit and they'd just be rich people with a fancy house, like the former royals in countries like Germany. They still do charity work.

Edited

But the “bowing”. is just a part of the job. We all
do things in our jobs that we have to do as part of our remit. It doesn’t mean that one son is somehow superior to the other. That is where Harry is getting it wrong. He isn’t capable of seeing the bigger picture and that the bowing (which isn’t compulsory anyway) is a mark of respect to the job, not the person

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 08/09/2026 11:44

@smilesy There are things like this that William could remove though. He probably won’t but as I said earlier, we are running out of working Royals. I’m not many years W&K will be pretty much on their own. At this rate, it will be 20 years before their dc do anything meaningful. No one else will be doing much in 20 years. So what then?

LaMarschallin · 08/09/2026 11:48

damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 11:40

I’m only going by what you posted - not what you ‘meant’ because I can’t read minds.

I think, in some cases here, an ability to read real minds wouldn't help.

damnatiomemoriae · 08/09/2026 11:50

Working royals pretty much serve their whole lives until they cannot.

i think W &C - even if they were on ‘their own’ - would be preferable to having H&M on board.

They have shown that they don’t bring anything to the table. They likely would cause some sort of offence or incident due to their inability and reluctance to learn.

Rhaidimiddim · 08/09/2026 11:51

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 08/09/2026 11:44

@smilesy There are things like this that William could remove though. He probably won’t but as I said earlier, we are running out of working Royals. I’m not many years W&K will be pretty much on their own. At this rate, it will be 20 years before their dc do anything meaningful. No one else will be doing much in 20 years. So what then?

Holograms.

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 11:52

PixieFairySprite · 08/09/2026 11:37

What I meant was that I don't care if they have acted like assholes. It's not up to us to care or to forgive. The general public seem to dislike them for saying things that hurt the RF but it's up to the RF to forgive (or not). Not us.

I am glad if the family are on good terms.

I thought we were talking about the institution since that is what this letter is about.

I hope they get along as well and very happy the children will experience the culture and countryside. They looks like sweet little people.

ThatCyanCat · 08/09/2026 11:53

quartile · 08/09/2026 11:30

Anyone else think all of this shows we'd be better off as a Republic. I couldn't imagine my younger children having to bow to their older brother. It just seems anachronistic and Harry and William are victims of this. Take away the royalty bit and they'd just be rich people with a fancy house, like the former royals in countries like Germany. They still do charity work.

Edited

I think there are arguments for being a republic (although honestly I'm not sure it's actually worth the administrative minefield of doing it; a slimmed down version seems wise though) but this is honestly the least of it. It's only a performative bow or curtesy on proper occasions; for the most part I think they just do a head dip when they first meet or possibly don't bother at all (I read an article on it once but now I can't remember). It's not a big deal.

One reason Harry has lost popularity is what seems like endless whinging that his brother ranks higher even though as a prince he still has all the privilege without the responsibility (as if William could ever have got away with some of the stuff Harry did in his youth!) and he's hardly the first sibling to an heir apparent or monarch. Most of the others seem to have been able to accept the system without taking it personally...

WitlessCheeseEatingPeasant · 08/09/2026 11:53

PixieFairySprite · 08/09/2026 11:38

Can you read? Did you read the whole exchange?

I read near at least a year 3 level but was also confused.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.