Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters thread 33

1000 replies

BigWillyLittleTodger · 01/09/2026 08:21

A shiny new thread for September Sussex shenanigans!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
36
Mylovelygreendress · 02/09/2026 07:48

Thedom · 02/09/2026 00:08

I don’t understand the ‘terrified to leave the house’ moan, they have their own personal bodyguards. I’m sure their team are well trained in defensive and evasive driving, highly trained in assessing any security risks in their immediate vicinity and on top of it, ready to react in a nano second, plus they are probably ex military and ex police.

Harry had about 5 or 6 bodyguards with him when he showed up for that Invictus thing a few weeks ago, as well as dragging in the two bemused police officers for ‘crowd’ control. He was fine, no one followed his car, no one even boo’d him.

It’s not like they are going to be driving through a gamut of angry protestors alone to get the kids to school, it’s parents whose main objective will be in getting their own kids back to school without any upset and having to deal with the drop off parking, I expect H&M will have special parking agreements so they don’t have to walk anywhere.

I would imagine M’s even bigger fear is being completely ignored and no one trying to take her photo .

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 07:49

taylorandme · 02/09/2026 07:47

Hopefully HaM will heed this advice themselves. They may be the only parents posting children's photos on their SM.

The idea that HaM and their dc are the most noteworthy, famous, and important people in the Cotswolds is as funny and ridiculous as their whole modus operandi is. It is just as silly as the statement 'due to huge backlash, The Gentlemen role is off' and all their other strange initiatives. It's Southpark all over again, the Cotswolds Privacy Tour. Almost everything they do has that ridiculous, overinflated and hilarious flavour. I suppose this is their brand, living royal caricatures starring in their very own scripted parody. It's an odd and cringeworthy spectacle.

Harry was once a senior royal, but the line of succession has moved on and he has naturally lost his position. He is stubbornly chasing a relevance he no longer has. Having been the spare for so long he likely perceives his own family as the "spare family", ignoring the fact that the actual spare roles have moved on to the Wales kids, as is expected.

The irony is that if they had just stayed calm and kept things classy, they would probably be quite popular today.

Very good points, excellent post 💯

BillyBites · 02/09/2026 07:57

Where has it been reported that Meghan is too scared to do the school run?

CoffeeCantata · 02/09/2026 08:05

Harry was once a senior royal, but the line of succession has moved on and he has naturally lost his position. He is stubbornly chasing a relevance he no longer has. Having been the spare for so long he likely perceives his own family as the "spare family", ignoring the fact that the actual spare roles have moved on to the Wales kids, as is expected.
The irony is that if they had just stayed calm and kept things classy, they would probably be quite popular today.

This is the situation in a nutshell.

They are both so impulsive and won't take advice, either from the MiGS or from their own PR people, if the rapid staff turnover is anything to go by.. They're not interested in the long game - they try this, they try that, they try this again.

Yes - they had it to lose, and they lost it by behaving like a pair of sulky teenagers. If only they'd realise that the only chance they have to recoup some respect is to live quietly, shun publicity (but not make a massive fuss about shunning pubicity....😂) and work at some genuine, unshowy projects. But there's more chance of me flying to the moon. Harry in particular seems to think he can turn back the clock and that the UK will just forget all the trouble he caused.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 02/09/2026 08:18

BillyBites · 02/09/2026 07:57

Where has it been reported that Meghan is too scared to do the school run?

I'm not aware that there is anything new on this, and thought it was just the media rehashing the story from last time, but someone please correct me if I'm wrong

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 08:20

Puzzledandpissedoff · 02/09/2026 08:18

I'm not aware that there is anything new on this, and thought it was just the media rehashing the story from last time, but someone please correct me if I'm wrong

The only place I know for sure that she's gone on record about it was The Cut interview which I've referenced upthread.
Anything else, I don't know.

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 08:20

CoffeeCantata · 02/09/2026 07:46

I really hope Meghan will refrain from using the 'Lilibet's Closet' domain name (which she registered some years ago) to merch children's clothing. That would be an unbelievably crass thing to do and would be a nightmare for the poor little girl. My guess is that she's had second thoughts about this, and thank goodness.

It's also not very....British. It might have gone down better in the States, when they were actually popular!

I agree 💯

Chrysanthemumsinpots · 02/09/2026 08:25

BalloonSlayer · 02/09/2026 07:23

I get the impression that no one in the family was 'allowed' to call their DD Elizabeth as a first name, as no one has and it's a lovely name and an obvious choice.

(In Tudor times for example, in court circles it was extremely common to name your child after the monarch. Eg Mary Boleyn's children were Catherine, Henry and Anne. Katherine Parr was named after Katherine of Aragon who was Queen when she was born. Which just goes to empasise the age difference between her and Henry VIII. Yuck. )

Anyway. I am also surprised that Harry didn't give his DD the first name Diana. I would imagine he and William agreed at some stage that neither of them would but still . . .

Henry VIII was only 11 when betrothed to Catherine of Aragon (she was 17 at the time) and 17 when they married. Henry was 52 and Katherine Parr 31 when they married - of course he needed a woman of child-bearing age.

HeirNspareBNB · 02/09/2026 08:28

Harrison in the Archers is a total bellend.

HeirNspareBNB · 02/09/2026 08:37

I’m wading in. Having been a school parent in a school like this, the rule of thumb is that the more notorious the parent, the more they get ignored. Pleasantries are exchanged in the queue for the post-match teas and then we bitch about them afterwards and share “They did WHAT?” stories at the parties they’re not invited to.

DaisyDooley · 02/09/2026 08:45

I didn’t like either of the children’s names.
Thought they were dreadful for ‘royalty’ - it just felt they were dumbing down.
.Now of course they are trying to ‘dumb up’ (is that a thing or have I just invented it?) with those utterly ridiculous names.

I also think they will be nowhere near hitting the mark with regards to living in the Cotswolds.
HNW/Famous people who live there and most importantly send their children to school there do it because they want to live in a nice house, in a nice area where they are just absorbed into the community and live a normal life. Thats the whole damn point of living there.
They actively want their children to feel normal nd to blend into life with little friends who like them becuse they are them, not becuse of who mummy/daddy are or because of their bank balance. They don’t go round photographing each other to sell or exploit the pictures.
They want their children to be safe nd there will be undiscussed rules tht keep this in place.
I didn’t hve a clue for example which school the Tindall kids go to. Why would I and why would I want to? I do now though thanks to all the speculation.
I may have had a modicum of respect for HAM if they had said after arriving here ‘we are going to be living quietly in the UK during term time while our children attend school here. Our time here will be private and we hope everyone including the press will respect tht. During holidays we intend to go back to our home in montecito where we will be carrying on with As Ever and our other commercial projects’.
I should - along with my large pearl collection- move to the Cotswolds. I would fit in beautifully because I remeber ‘famous people’ but in my head they are ‘Kevin the joiner’ and ‘Anthony the Bank manager’. I think that they know me too -which they would if they really were ‘Anthony the bank manager’ as opposed to ‘Rishi Sunak, Prime minister’. It’s only when I walk away that DD or DH would say to me ‘who do you think that was’. It’s seeing people just doing the ‘normal’ stuff that throws me I suppose, so HAM would be safe with me as I would probably think they were the nice chap from the Italian/James cousin we met at that bbq or the American woman from the spa who booked me in last week. Although I suspect that’s not what they want…..

StaySpicy · 02/09/2026 08:47

Beesandhoney123 · 02/09/2026 07:36

Oh, just thought ' terrified of the school run' isnt the same as terrified to go out.

Maybe M has heard all about judgy school runs, being blanked by other mums, the cliche ! Maybe M is reading Mumsnet with a sinking heart.

Get your big girl pants on M. Or send the nanny. Starr your own thread!!!

That makes sense!

Still begs the question 'why?' though. Why move back here? Because it goes against so much of what they have said.

MaturingCheeseball · 02/09/2026 08:50

I wonder if M will be “accidentally” photographed in the Mums’ Race at Sports Day (remember who did this?) although I think she has two (big) left feet so it might be Aitch for that one.

diddl · 02/09/2026 09:03

So who has leaked that A&L's school has sent out a reminder re pics?

Won't Harry be terrified that people know which school?

JoanChitty · 02/09/2026 09:05

Re the pp saying that HAm are famous, yes there are. However I would say they are more notorious given their shenanigans.

JoanChitty · 02/09/2026 09:06
  • they
Mylovelygreendress · 02/09/2026 09:08

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 08:20

The only place I know for sure that she's gone on record about it was The Cut interview which I've referenced upthread.
Anything else, I don't know.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/40230552/meghan-fears-school-run-without-security/

Verifying Device

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/40230552/meghan-fears-school-run-without-security

Wommmble · 02/09/2026 09:08

StaySpicy · 02/09/2026 08:47

That makes sense!

Still begs the question 'why?' though. Why move back here? Because it goes against so much of what they have said.

Because she ain’t staying (if shes here at all) … shes ensconced her defective, debt ridden, volatile, addict STBXH back into his family and community for him to be their problem and out of her her in LA as skips off back stateside.

Treylime · 02/09/2026 09:10

MaturingCheeseball · 02/09/2026 08:50

I wonder if M will be “accidentally” photographed in the Mums’ Race at Sports Day (remember who did this?) although I think she has two (big) left feet so it might be Aitch for that one.

I dont think M is very sporty so probably not.
I was thinking about Harrys plan to be on the sidelines watching A play rugby. It is as though they have a plan for their kids which may or may not be based on reality. Archie may hate rugby, lots of boys do. Even if he likes it he may not be very good at it. My ds loved football, he was in the village team for years but the truth was he wasn't a very good player. He so wanted to be good and his friends were all good players so he found it frustrating that he wasn't better. I hope H doesn't expect A to be his mini-me

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 09:12

Treylime · 02/09/2026 09:10

I dont think M is very sporty so probably not.
I was thinking about Harrys plan to be on the sidelines watching A play rugby. It is as though they have a plan for their kids which may or may not be based on reality. Archie may hate rugby, lots of boys do. Even if he likes it he may not be very good at it. My ds loved football, he was in the village team for years but the truth was he wasn't a very good player. He so wanted to be good and his friends were all good players so he found it frustrating that he wasn't better. I hope H doesn't expect A to be his mini-me

I think the gendered expectations are already apparent.

diddl · 02/09/2026 09:17

JoanChitty · 02/09/2026 09:05

Re the pp saying that HAm are famous, yes there are. However I would say they are more notorious given their shenanigans.

"Infamy, infamy..."

Wommmble · 02/09/2026 09:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CoffeeCantata · 02/09/2026 09:21

HeirNspareBNB · 02/09/2026 08:37

I’m wading in. Having been a school parent in a school like this, the rule of thumb is that the more notorious the parent, the more they get ignored. Pleasantries are exchanged in the queue for the post-match teas and then we bitch about them afterwards and share “They did WHAT?” stories at the parties they’re not invited to.

I worked at an independent school at one point and a then-very-famous actor's children attended. Staff were instructed not to look at him when he came to collect the children. He'd stand well apart and gaze into the distance. Can you imagine?

It was ridiculous, and from time to time there'd be a reminder from the Head that this chap had been annoyed that some people (maybe other parents, or maybe figments of his daft imagination) had actually been staring at him.

I'm sure he was the exception and many famous people are sensible enough to know that the less fuss you make, the easier and simpler everything will be. And also - most people aren't interested in you, they're not looking at YOU, and some may not know you from Adam.

CoffeeCantata · 02/09/2026 09:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

OMG 😂

BalloonSlayer · 02/09/2026 09:39

PoppysAunt · 02/09/2026 07:37

I don't think there were any restrictions?
They could have called her Elizabeth, or Eliza or Beth? Or even had Elizabeth Diana as two middle names a la Charlotte. No, they went for the most distinctive first name of Lilibet.

I haven't heard of any restrictions but none of the late Queen's granddaughters or great-granddaughters have Elizabeth as their first name, which I think it's odd as it's still a popular modern name. They all seem to have it as a middle name though. None of them are called Victoria either as a first name, and that is still a popular enough name too.

I think the only explanation is that it's not considered to be the 'done thing' in the family.

I cringed when they called their DD Lilibet, then had to remind myself that I am actually also called my Granny's nickname!! But I think the main cringe comes from Lilibet not being an actual name in its own right - as opposed to, say, Peggy which is short for Margaret but plenty of people are just called Peggy and no one bats and eyelid.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.