GBNews reporting Harry and Megan moving back to the UK

[TinyBlueDent]

GBNews are reporting that Harry and Megan are moving back to the UK at the end of August.

I won't believe it until I hear it on the BBC.

And the monarchy itself.... George would be King and would have to allow it as well if William didn't do it.

Oh yeah, mea culpa you're right, but George might say feck it, I'm off to live with the turtles in the Galapagos, then who would it be? Or put it another way, who would have to step away for Harry and Meghan to ascend the throne.

Maybe that's the plot they are hatching by coming back. LOL.

It would be any kids George had by then, if they all abidocates.... then it's Charlotte and her children...and if they all abdicate, it would be Louis and then his kids..

.and THEN of they all abdicate, it would be Harry.

However if George isn't of age when William abdicates, Harry would be regent, if he couldn't/wouldn't it's Andrew, if he couldn't/wouldn't, it's Beatrice, until George turned 18. Then George would be King... Unless he abdicates, then it would be back to a regent until his kids are if age, if no kids regent until Charlotte or any is of age

Hence why William won't willingly be going anywhere for the next five years 😅.

However if George isn't of age when William abdicates, Harry would be regent, if he couldn't/wouldn't it's Andrew, if he couldn't/wouldn't, it's Beatrice

No, Parliament would pass a Regency Act naming whoever seemed to be the most appropriate person or persons at the time. Could be a Council with Catherine, Anne and Edward.

But I can't imagine William ever putting George or any of his children in that position.

No, he definitely wouldn't.

It wouldn't ever be Catherine as regent as she is not a counsellor of state nor in the LOS, personally I don't think Anne would go for either it, she's 76.

😂😂

I am fully bamboozled by the various permutations involving a successor if the future monarch decides to leg it!

I say put all their mugshots on a billboard and vote in order of your choice. Free darts available for target practise. Can you imagine the hustings and the infighting, and handbags at dawn. We need a bit of theatre and rivalry, come on then....

It wouldn't ever be Catherine as regent as she is not a counsellor of state nor in the LOS

If Parliament passed legislation to say that Catherine should be Regent, she would be.
Catherine of Aragon acted as Regent for Henry VIII when Henry was absent campaigning in France.
I think a Council of Regency or a Protectorate with Catherine as a member would be more likely. Membership would have to be carefully limited to exclude Uncle Charles Spencer too.
I'm sure there are contingency plans which would be put into action should it be necessary.

Charles needs to remove H from the line of succession as H has opted out of RF but sadly I think he’s not brave enough so he’ll leave it to William - which is very unfair.
Come on Charles, be brave!

I hope so. I hope they feel peace.

Only parliament ( of all countries that have the same head of state) can remove someone from the LOS .

Come on, Charles could and should push for this - otherwise there will continue to be speculation of H’s role/future roles of his kids. Could be a bit of a nightmare for William now and in the future.

Why would he, and I don't know if he actually can anyway? Don't forget that Andrew MW is still 8th in line even though he has been "dealt with". Don't make me laugh with that family. Smoke and mirrors methinks.

It's Parliament that needs to up its game WRT shenanigans in the RF. All of it, money, titles, largesse, taxes, wills, finances, everything. It's not just about Harry and Meghan either, they are probably saintly compared to others if the veil was lifted.

I don't disagree with you on any of that but I was replying to a comment that accused the woman of being "workshy" which in the circumstances seemed pretty harsh.

It didn’t happen before, I doubt it will happen now.

Harry doesn’t have a birthright to a royal job

All of this. It was a very public betrayal of the royal family and essentially sealed their fate with the public

He can’t, that is not how the monarchy works, and it would have to be agreed by ..Canada…Australia…to name just a few other countries, if it was as easy as people think Andrew would have been removed already.

He also needs to remove AMW

Under the current Regency act it would be Harry then Andrew - they could try and quickly push through another Regency act naming someone else but that depends on parliament agreeing and there isn't meant to be a gap.

It'll be Catherine with Anne and Edward, if it hasn't been changed already.

He can't - as @jeffgoldblumsays, it's quite a procedure. KC is a constitutional monarch, he can't act without consent.

If they need to make money I'm not sure how they'll do that by keeping to themselves.