Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
24
Mylovelygreendress · 05/11/2025 22:50

Of course it had to be announced today !

mum2jakie · 05/11/2025 22:53

Mylovelygreendress · 05/11/2025 22:50

Of course it had to be announced today !

Why, what's the significance of today?

AtIusvue · 05/11/2025 22:56

I’d expect she’d get a hefty pay cheque. Amazon being the first to get her back on a movie set- interesting not NF

But that deal and the big money ended a few months ago.

OP posts:
BeeWitchy · 05/11/2025 23:10

Good for her.

I started the DM piece and I got as far as ‘Experts said’ What experts? Experts of what?

AtIusvue · 05/11/2025 23:17

She said in 2022 in Variety, she was done with acting. Harry was indignant at the idea that the RF expected her to carry on acting once married…..and yet here we are.

She really wouldn’t have even considered this a year ago. There has been so much change since she lost the NF deal. The crazy PR drive, turning up at fashion week and now having to do cameos. It’s only been a few months since it ended!!

OP posts:
BigWillyLittleTodger · 05/11/2025 23:33

Yes she said she was done with acting, times must be tough.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 05/11/2025 23:34

Mylovelygreendress · 05/11/2025 22:50

Of course it had to be announced today !

I thought that, regular as clockwork 😂

BigWillyLittleTodger · 05/11/2025 23:35

AtIusvue · 05/11/2025 23:17

She said in 2022 in Variety, she was done with acting. Harry was indignant at the idea that the RF expected her to carry on acting once married…..and yet here we are.

She really wouldn’t have even considered this a year ago. There has been so much change since she lost the NF deal. The crazy PR drive, turning up at fashion week and now having to do cameos. It’s only been a few months since it ended!!

Is it not the lead role?

AsEverATwat · 05/11/2025 23:43

BigWillyLittleTodger · 05/11/2025 23:35

Is it not the lead role?

She’s playing herself apparently

Indianrollerbird · 05/11/2025 23:48

Some might say she never stopped acting….

Spectre8 · 06/11/2025 00:23

Goodluck to her

StElwicksNeighbourhoodAssociation · 06/11/2025 00:39

'Prince Harry is, of course, really supportive and quite simply wants Meghan to do whatever brings her joy.'
Oh that word joy again! Is that you Meghan?

Wellthatsacharlingknot · 06/11/2025 00:46

BigWillyLittleTodger · 05/11/2025 23:33

Yes she said she was done with acting, times must be tough.

Of… times are not tough at all and … stop press … actress returns to acting after having two children… how very unusual!

Toseland · 06/11/2025 00:58

They've run out of money

Hiptothisjive · 06/11/2025 01:12

Return to acting? That would imply she never left - I think she’s been acting her little socks off for years since she left Hollywood (and by that I mean a supporting role on a very average not very heavily watched show filmed in Toronto).

TheAutumnalCrow · 06/11/2025 03:05

Crikey that ‘source’ is doing some heavy lifting.

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/meghan-acting-return-hollywood-film-close-personal-friends-sppsj3r0l

https://archive.ph/nlkWw

So it’s possibly one day’s filming for a two minute walk-on cameo, e.g. Meghan is seen and heard ordering a cocktail in a restaurant, or walking down a street and turning her head. A line or two. And the rich/poor characters react to that, in the rehashed Reitman’s style of ‘isn’t that … Meghan Markle?’ The end.

Meghan set to make acting return in new Hollywood film — as herself

The Duchess of Sussex is thought to be appearing alongside Lily Collins and Brie Larson in Close Personal Friends, eight years after announcing her retirement

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/meghan-acting-return-hollywood-film-close-personal-friends-sppsj3r0l

BlueEyedBogWitch · 06/11/2025 03:11

I’ve never understood why she packed it in.

Not that she was very good. She was passable in Suits, but I caught her in some bloody awful Hallmark-style thing and she was abominably bad.

PigglyWigglyOhYeah · 06/11/2025 06:15

Is it acting if you’re just appearing on screen for two minutes as yourself? We’re not really in RSC territory here.

Edited for typo.

TheAutumnalCrow · 06/11/2025 06:23

PigglyWigglyOhYeah · 06/11/2025 06:15

Is it acting if you’re just appearing on screen for two minutes as yourself? We’re not really in RSC territory here.

Edited for typo.

Edited

That’s a good theoretical question. How does one play oneself in a movie when one lives and breathes Main Character Syndrome to start with?

It’s more like meta-acting. Or meta-playacting, given the movie genre.

wordler · 06/11/2025 06:25

It’s probably best to start like this with several small cameos then increasing the size of projects slowly - because anything new she does right now is picked over but if she eases into it over time everyone will become more used to it.

If she’d started with a big role or something a bit different like a theatre production there d be a lot of people hate watching hoping for failure which is too much pressure.

Ohpleeeease · 06/11/2025 07:15

I think it hinges on what playing “herself” means. Her character is one part of a famous couple, so it’ll depend what aspect of her fame she leans into.

If she’s playing a Californian bizzfluencer, fair dos, but if she’s there as the wife of a British prince and a Duchess, then I hope BP will take a good look at whether this breaks the Sandringham agreement and take swift action.

The only good thing about the Andrew fiasco is that it has opened a route for the rf to clear out its dross.

Motnight · 06/11/2025 07:19

I wonder if Harry's going to make a guest appearance as well 😬

AtIusvue · 06/11/2025 07:19

BigWillyLittleTodger · 05/11/2025 23:35

Is it not the lead role?

No, it’s a cameo seemingly

OP posts:
wordler · 06/11/2025 07:26

Ohpleeeease · 06/11/2025 07:15

I think it hinges on what playing “herself” means. Her character is one part of a famous couple, so it’ll depend what aspect of her fame she leans into.

If she’s playing a Californian bizzfluencer, fair dos, but if she’s there as the wife of a British prince and a Duchess, then I hope BP will take a good look at whether this breaks the Sandringham agreement and take swift action.

The only good thing about the Andrew fiasco is that it has opened a route for the rf to clear out its dross.

I don’t think she’s part of one of the couples. The main cast are younger - I think they are the two couples and Meghan is doing a cameo.

NewAgeNewMe · 06/11/2025 07:29

Meghan is so famous now she doesn’t need the Sussex title. I hope she goes by Meghan Markle, that’s what I would do now, if I was her. Don’t like the Sussexes behaviour however I really admire Meghan’s tenacity.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.