Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex spotted out and about, part 2

1000 replies

queentim · 29/09/2023 17:05

Part 2 of a nice, unproblematic thread to discuss some of the fab outfits from the Duchess of Sussex, and some of the many great causes she (and Harry) and Archewell supports.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
80
queenofallqueens · 21/12/2023 18:34

This reply has been deleted

We decided to take this down as it is not in the spirit of the site.

I understood it clearly despite all the shorthand. I guess the twitter character limit also doesn't help😅

mrsmingleton · 21/12/2023 18:39

@TallerSally they are writing articles about Meghan using a $20 tumbler?

pilates · 21/12/2023 18:43

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

queenofallqueens · 21/12/2023 18:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I disagree totally. It was in response to a furore that H&M dumped their kids in montecito 'at christmas' and went on holiday.

He/she makes many valid points including- 1. the kids were there. 2, you keep saying they are not important so why do you even care

Mytattooisbiggerthanyours · 21/12/2023 18:50

I also saw on Twitter that they were there as a family holiday, all four of them.

ALittleTeawithmilk · 21/12/2023 22:34

It’s about that time of year I guess

The way this thread is going - I think this might help.

https://twitter.com/simonharris_mbd/status/1735645635490038049/mediaviewer

TallerSally · 21/12/2023 22:36

So lovely to see how M&H have mastered the art of travelling incognito without the tabloids generating hysteria and threatening their safety wherever they go.

Whether it's this Costa Rica trip or Portugal with Harry's cousins or wherever else, the rabid tabloids find out after they've already left, with zero opportunity to grab pap shots or footage which their 'royal experts' and 'lip readers' and 'body language experts' and 'sources' can analyse to DEATH for signs of disrespect to the royal family, or that they're about to SEPARATE, or some other boring nonsense!

I can also understand why they don't want to go to the UK, where they'd cause the country to shut down. No-one would do any work, as everyone would be busy posting on "Attention-Seeking Liar Meg Should Go Back to California PART 362" threads from morning to night...

queenofallqueens · 21/12/2023 22:49

love it for them.

They are not important yet send the rags into a spin with their every move. It's a super power almost

TallerSally · 21/12/2023 22:56

... and let me tell you, before someone else pinches it: you read it here first - the plot for Suits Season 10! I think they stopped counting after it hit 40 billion viewing hours this summer, but this plot is what'll make it explode, baby!

Rachel Zane and Mike Ross' Seattle law firm has been doing so well that they decide to expand internationally, and open an office in... London.

Their first case is about a local celeb who has been fighting against press intrusion all his life, and now has decided to sue the biggest media groups in the UK for hacking his phone, following him everywhere and scaring off his girlfriends.

The media groups deploy all sorts of killer lawyers (literally) and underhand methods to try to win, so Rachel and Mike get Harvey Specter in on the case, and suddenly, the fashion sense in the London High Court reaches stratospheric levels!

What happens next? Does Rachel falls in love with the dishy local celeb? or does she stay with Mike?..... you decide....

AuroraCake · 21/12/2023 23:28

TallerSally · 21/12/2023 22:36

So lovely to see how M&H have mastered the art of travelling incognito without the tabloids generating hysteria and threatening their safety wherever they go.

Whether it's this Costa Rica trip or Portugal with Harry's cousins or wherever else, the rabid tabloids find out after they've already left, with zero opportunity to grab pap shots or footage which their 'royal experts' and 'lip readers' and 'body language experts' and 'sources' can analyse to DEATH for signs of disrespect to the royal family, or that they're about to SEPARATE, or some other boring nonsense!

I can also understand why they don't want to go to the UK, where they'd cause the country to shut down. No-one would do any work, as everyone would be busy posting on "Attention-Seeking Liar Meg Should Go Back to California PART 362" threads from morning to night...

Celebrities get papped. Like not as much as they used to but they still do. Occupational hazard. The royals themselves have managed to avoid it on holidays.

mrsmingleton · 21/12/2023 23:58

TallerSally · 21/12/2023 22:36

So lovely to see how M&H have mastered the art of travelling incognito without the tabloids generating hysteria and threatening their safety wherever they go.

Whether it's this Costa Rica trip or Portugal with Harry's cousins or wherever else, the rabid tabloids find out after they've already left, with zero opportunity to grab pap shots or footage which their 'royal experts' and 'lip readers' and 'body language experts' and 'sources' can analyse to DEATH for signs of disrespect to the royal family, or that they're about to SEPARATE, or some other boring nonsense!

I can also understand why they don't want to go to the UK, where they'd cause the country to shut down. No-one would do any work, as everyone would be busy posting on "Attention-Seeking Liar Meg Should Go Back to California PART 362" threads from morning to night...

so why do they need all this security that Harry wants?

skullbabe · 22/12/2023 00:14

so why do they need all this security that Harry wants?

That discussion you are looking for is here. However, your question makes no sense in the context of what Taller was talking about which was the ability of them to travel undetected.

RAVEC - Prince Harry | Mumsnet

Can someone explain to me the procedure and how this works?

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/the_royal_family/4957548-ravec-prince-harry

queentim · 22/12/2023 00:15

There are 50 threads about RAVEC and Harry's security to be found in the royal forum @mrsmingleton . Take that discussion there instead of trying to derail and goad this thread, thanks.

OP posts:
mrsmingleton · 22/12/2023 07:59

skullbabe · 22/12/2023 00:14

so why do they need all this security that Harry wants?

That discussion you are looking for is here. However, your question makes no sense in the context of what Taller was talking about which was the ability of them to travel undetected.

It makes sense to me as she said

"M&H have mastered the art of travelling incognito without the tabloids generating hysteria and threatening their safety wherever they go."

@queentim the same point applies to yourself.

queenofallqueens · 22/12/2023 08:06

mrsmingleton · 22/12/2023 07:59

It makes sense to me as she said

"M&H have mastered the art of travelling incognito without the tabloids generating hysteria and threatening their safety wherever they go."

@queentim the same point applies to yourself.

it makes absolutely no sense whatsover, but you knew this

this is a Part 2 of a nice, unproblematic thread to discuss some of the fab outfits from the Duchess of Sussex, and some of the many great causes she (and Harry) and Archewell supports.

As said upthread, there's a whole thread about security- use your voice there.

They've been on holiday and look lovely. Not emaciated😘

whattheactualfrog · 22/12/2023 08:12

Harry is probably disappointed not pleased the location has be leaked

pinkmont · 22/12/2023 16:08

I think it is a ‘genuine’ photo taken surreptitiously and unbeknownst to them rather than a staged pap shot. It is very different to the staged pap photos of Meghan.

I wonder why it was released well after they returned back to the US and not during their time there.

pinkmont · 22/12/2023 16:17

as everyone would be busy posting on "Attention-Seeking Liar Meg Should Go Back to California PART 362" threads from morning to night...

haha,

possibly 75% of Royal watchers, rather than everyone, and the other 25% of Royal watchers would be working day and night to challenge every and anything that looked like a slight on their favourite Royal Family couple, and somewhere in there a small group of loons on both sides, taking it all rather personally and bring mortally offended.

queenofallqueens · 22/12/2023 16:38

pinkmont · 22/12/2023 16:17

as everyone would be busy posting on "Attention-Seeking Liar Meg Should Go Back to California PART 362" threads from morning to night...

haha,

possibly 75% of Royal watchers, rather than everyone, and the other 25% of Royal watchers would be working day and night to challenge every and anything that looked like a slight on their favourite Royal Family couple, and somewhere in there a small group of loons on both sides, taking it all rather personally and bring mortally offended.

interesting you use the word loons. MM doesn't need any staged photos c'mon now.

BTW ,You may find this tweet by a 'loon' and the swift rebuttal by a father who lost his child very interesting

Let’s not forget when #MeghanMarkle took her cameras to a literal CRIME SCENE, 3 days after the mass murder of children. Using Uvalde to raise her profile & get press. But she’s a hUmAniTariAn. You want to pay respects? Be respectful & leave the cameras.

You’re so far from the truth.

She arrived without media, and did tell them to leave that she wasn’t there for them. She has also kept in contact with my wife.

You know who did show up with cameras?

@McConaughey did.

And @GregAbbott_TX only asked to go to our kids funerals if he could bring his personal media and when we said no, he refused to go.

Maybe it’s best not to talk on a subject you’re so woefully ignorant on.

pinkmont · 22/12/2023 16:47

Exactly, it’s those kind of loons !

and then the ones , not quite in the loon category, who take it all very personally.

I don’t do twitter, from what I hear the loons come out in force on there.

queenofallqueens · 22/12/2023 16:51

pinkmont · 22/12/2023 16:47

Exactly, it’s those kind of loons !

and then the ones , not quite in the loon category, who take it all very personally.

I don’t do twitter, from what I hear the loons come out in force on there.

Twitter is actually very balanced even if some of the language can be harsh.

I could borrow your word loons to some of the threads endless started to bash H&M or the ones that come on to nice unproblematic threads like this and attempt to derail.

whattheactualfrog · 22/12/2023 17:13

I think the pap shots of them in Costa Rica are definitely not staged, they actually look quite intrusive & from how grainy they are they are probably taken from a distance. I think M&H will be sad especially as Lilli is in them. The good news is the tabloids are not running the photos, it’s only some of the glossy magazines and they’re just linking to them not actually printing. I think paparazzi are so sketchy.

pinkmont · 22/12/2023 17:51

I’m sure you know you can report when you see loons or derails on here. 🙏🏻

pinkmont · 22/12/2023 17:53

@whattheactualfrog I agree with you, glad the tabloids have refrained from printing them.

queenofallqueens · 22/12/2023 19:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.