Dear MNHQ, I didn't see all the problems kick off over poor Revjustabout...

[georgimama]

but I would be grateful if you could tell me that you have at least given serious consideration to banning the posters who were harrassing her.

Thank you.

i thought with a name like that fuckit you would appreciate plain speaking.... (and i didnt really get it, esp. the first bit)

i thought with a name like that fuckit you would appreciate plain speaking.... (and i didnt really get it, esp. the first bit)

i thought with a name like that fuckit you would appreciate plain speaking.... (and i didnt really get it, esp. the first bit)

aaaagh. sorry. i malfunctioned.

fuckitgoblin. your name was a phrase i saw on moldies when i was there. i'm loathe to get all conspiracy-tastic but are you spelling it mouldies to throw people off the scent of your moldiness?
(i should stress i don't care whether you are or aren't, tbh, but i just thought that your post was odd).

justine i thought he was a psychologist, not a psychiatrist

The point of an chat/advice board like this is that it gives everyone a chance to be an "authority" on something. Doesn't matter whether it's in your nickname or not.
For all the disclaimers, I really can't believe the majority would assume a posters opinion is the word of godmumsnet.
and how can it be fair for any other poster to retain any sort of job title/professional qualification in their nickname, in jest or no> ? someone might believe them

i can't remember who but it was said to rev.

all in the name of protecting innocent members of mn from a troll.

my fucking arse.

ruty, I didn't read all the threads - I'm simply putting over my opinion about the bits I've read.

and if you were on moldies at the time you'll know that it wasn't quite as nice as a simple 'revoke'.

yeah.... who are you? and where is your goblin certificate?

But JF was a fraud, and a number of us pointed this out to MNHQ (who took some time to take any action in that instance). And in that instant he was impersonating a RL traceable barrister and giving bad/wrong advice.

Rev isn't a fraud and no-one has raised any concern about what she has actually done on RW etc.

Oi Richard Dawkins - if you're planning to set yourself up as MN's ethological expert, we'll have to ask you to name change...

what happened aitch? it will be cathartic to tell us..... (maybe)....

Mr JA got angry and said something out of order and has apologised - i think?

LadyMuck I was pointing out that those who doubted Revjusta thought of her as a JudgeFlounce - not suggesting she was akin in any way.

Aitch you are clever!

Realises she has been using wrong spelling and is actually a bit pleased!

pph sophable? i am shocked.

LM - yes, that's the point - an example of a long-standing poster, defended vociferously by MNers, who turned out to be a fraud. Which is why, inevitably, people who were around at that time may sometimes question the identities of others, especially those who take on a perceived 'role' on the board. I know that the Rev has proved her credentials - fine, she's genuine. She's not another Judge Flounce. But she could have been - any of us could - and MNHQ say that if you have concerns about a poster to let them know.

just to reiterate i have left moldies and will not be returning (sounds of muted cheers from moldieland).

oh don't lets name names. it's too awful.

yes it was shocking.

it got... tense, CF.

fuckit, if as aitch suggests you are a mouldie who was a longstanding mner who has name changed after joining mouldies for mn posting purposes then you are one of the people i was moaning about lower down this thread....

why name change?