Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

What's this 'show more/show less' nonsense for?!

189 replies

BIWI · 08/07/2026 15:01

It completely breaks up the flow of a thread.

Do you really think we haven't got the brain power to read a post that's longer than two paragraphs?!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
CrossPurposes · 16/07/2026 18:15

Chiming in to add to the chorus of disapproval.

BatshitCrazyWoman · 16/07/2026 18:46

Bloody hell, it's back. Still don't like it. I can see the point with long quotes but not posts. Could it at least be optional?

CriticalCondition · 16/07/2026 19:28

It's awful. I read the conversations here, I don't scan them. It makes me engage less, not more because it puts a barrier between me and what's being said.

MN conversations feel very natural. They flow. If I don't want to read a contribution in full, for whatever reason (and I decide if it's too long, or boring or irrelevant, not MN) , then I'll skim or skip to the next one in the same way I might tune out someone in real life. This feature feels like a third person putting up a hand to stop someone finishing their point and I have to ask that they be allowed to finish.

We're not children.

NotSoLittle · 16/07/2026 20:33

Still hate it

AnAutumnCrow · 16/07/2026 20:36

SirChenjins · 16/07/2026 17:30

I thought I had a glitch on my phone and looked for a thread to explain it - and then see it's an actual thing that MN have introduced as a result of mysterious feedback. I didn't see an posts asking for such feedback - did anyone else?

It's a horrible feature - breaks up the reading flow and forces posters to write soundbites rather than measured, thought out responses. Please get rid of it MN.

Edited

Maybe they used the same 'Focus Group' as the ones that approved the Good Law Project 'monster' poster campaign that lasted about a day and a half.

ElenOfTheWays · 16/07/2026 20:47

AmeliaPMumsnet · 16/07/2026 14:03

Hi all,

Thank you again for all your feedback on the truncation feature released last week.

We've just released it again with a change based directly on the feedback we received last week. The original cut-off point was too short, so we’ve increased it. This means posts will need to be considerably longer before they’re collapsed.

Long quoted sections will continue to be collapsed, as we hope this will make lengthy posts in quotes easier to scan and read. They can still be expanded and collapsed using ‘See more’ and ‘See less’.

We hope this change is less intrusive while keeping the benefit for particularly long posts and quotes. Please let us know how you find it.

Still hate it. At least give us an opt out option please

SausagesAndBananas · 16/07/2026 21:10

Hate it, hate it, hate it.
Please remove it altogether. As others have said, the reason I still continue to MN after all these years is because I enjoy reading the longer, and often more thought provoking responses.
If I wanted short and snappy rather than reasoned and with depth, I would use other sites.

ratinamustardhat · 16/07/2026 21:11

Aargh! What is wrong with you? 😡

What's this 'show more/show less' nonsense for?!
SirChenjins · 16/07/2026 21:14

AnAutumnCrow · 16/07/2026 20:36

Maybe they used the same 'Focus Group' as the ones that approved the Good Law Project 'monster' poster campaign that lasted about a day and a half.

It can only be.

If there is some such rent-a-focus group, maybe MN could give us some advance notice of their upcoming madness and put the plans to a wider vote?

ISaySteadyOn · 16/07/2026 21:16

Yes, is there any way to make it optional at all?

DoneAndNotDusted · 16/07/2026 21:38

Another one here who doesn't like this feature at all. Very annoying and unnecessary; please, if you insist on keeping it, give us an opt-out option as others have suggested. Thank you!

GreenLemonade · 16/07/2026 21:44

Please remove this feature or make it optional, it’s awful!

Nodirectionhome · 16/07/2026 21:46

I have just rad a post with 14 lines (in paragraphs, not a wall of text) before the "read more." It expanded to 16 lines. Surely that wasn't long enough to require truncating?

Halsall · 16/07/2026 22:24

Repeating my previous comment that this is awful. Genuinely, what is the point?

ElenOfTheWays · 16/07/2026 22:27

Seems to be slowing the site down too. Unless it's a coincidence.

I don't believe in coincidence
PLEASE get rid of it. It's crap

BobBobBobbing · 16/07/2026 22:33

Another one who hates it.

RecoIIectionsMayVary · 16/07/2026 22:57

I think it is the regular and long time posters that hate it, I recognise so many of you from long running threads.

In an AIBU thread it doesn't matter if you skim it, or don't read every post. However in the sub forums where posters are having a full conversation it really interrupts the reading.

I am reading every post, and I have the attention span to even read long ones.

AnAutumnCrow · 16/07/2026 23:01

ElenOfTheWays · 16/07/2026 22:27

Seems to be slowing the site down too. Unless it's a coincidence.

I don't believe in coincidence
PLEASE get rid of it. It's crap

They appeared together, yes. Ridiculous.

MustardBear · 16/07/2026 23:13

@AmeliaPMumsnet It’s an utterly pointless update. It doesn’t enhance anything, in fact as has been evidenced from all the posts here, it’s actually making the user experience worse.
Can you please either get rid of it or make it optional.
🙏

MustardBear · 16/07/2026 23:15

And yes, most people read threads. To fully engage.
We don’t scan.

DixonD · 16/07/2026 23:55

No one has asked for this @AmeliaPMumsnet . Not sure why it’s been decided to bring it in as a feature. It’s not necessary and hugely annoying. Please make it optional or rethink having it at all.

EverMissWicklowSometimes · 16/07/2026 23:59

I like it. It will teach everyone to be brief.

BabblingBiddy · 17/07/2026 00:02

EverMissWicklowSometimes · 16/07/2026 23:59

I like it. It will teach everyone to be brief.

But sometimes posts don't need to be brief. Some of us are capable of reading long posts.
If you want brief then stick to X or whatever other sites have a character limit.

NoCommentingFromNowOn · 17/07/2026 00:04

EverMissWicklowSometimes · 16/07/2026 23:59

I like it. It will teach everyone to be brief.

If you want brief go to Twitter.

or…

brief? X.

Judystilldreamsofhorses · 17/07/2026 00:06

I just noticed this today and absolutely hate it - please make it optional @AmeliaPMumsnet