Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

What's this 'show more/show less' nonsense for?!

189 replies

BIWI · 08/07/2026 15:01

It completely breaks up the flow of a thread.

Do you really think we haven't got the brain power to read a post that's longer than two paragraphs?!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
FunnyDoginLahLahLand · 17/07/2026 13:00

God I hate it as well. Click click click click just to read bloody posts. Argh!

And I'm on mobile as well.

hairstreak · 17/07/2026 13:02

Arrrrgh this is such a pain! Take it away 😫

It would be way more helpful to add it to all quotes of >3 lines. Utterly unnecessary in new posts though.

Get rid of the "load newer/older posts" button while you're at it, that's another pointless irritation.

Naurrr · 17/07/2026 13:05

FunnyDoginLahLahLand · 17/07/2026 13:00

God I hate it as well. Click click click click just to read bloody posts. Argh!

And I'm on mobile as well.

Edited

Just don't click. I'm not bothering to read posts now where the site is failing to display them correctly.
Less engagement is what they want, which is fine by me.

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 17/07/2026 13:06

Naurrr · 17/07/2026 13:05

Just don't click. I'm not bothering to read posts now where the site is failing to display them correctly.
Less engagement is what they want, which is fine by me.

I am now doing the same. Less engagement. Is this really what the advertisers want, Mumsnet?
ed. weird spacing

SheilaFentiman · 17/07/2026 13:07

Naurrr · 17/07/2026 13:05

Just don't click. I'm not bothering to read posts now where the site is failing to display them correctly.
Less engagement is what they want, which is fine by me.

But I want to read full posts on threads where I have built familiarity/friendships.

AnAutumnCrow · 17/07/2026 13:12

In terms of disability/accessibility, I already have finger splints on arthritic fingers. All this click-click-clicking is bloody awful. Badly done, MNHQ, badly done.

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 17/07/2026 13:25

AnAutumnCrow · 17/07/2026 13:12

In terms of disability/accessibility, I already have finger splints on arthritic fingers. All this click-click-clicking is bloody awful. Badly done, MNHQ, badly done.

Responding without tagging. Does this work?

Recklessismymiddlename · 17/07/2026 13:41

I’m just hearing Austen’s Knightley saying Badly done now to MN instead of to Emma @AnAutumnCrow 😁

TemuSussex · 17/07/2026 13:56

It is HORRIBLE! Please make it go away. Nobody asked for it surely? (Haven't RTFT)

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 17/07/2026 14:03

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 17/07/2026 13:06

I am now doing the same. Less engagement. Is this really what the advertisers want, Mumsnet?
ed. weird spacing

Edited

It probably is. The less time you spend actually reading a page, the more quickly you click on the next one, meaning the more quickly they can show you a fresh load of adverts.

In the short term, its a gain for Mumsnet, but if it turns enough people off the platform, it's likely to do long term to the website. There's defintitely been a drop in overall threads started over the last 6 months or so, this change isn't going to help with that

SirChenjins · 17/07/2026 14:29

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 17/07/2026 14:03

It probably is. The less time you spend actually reading a page, the more quickly you click on the next one, meaning the more quickly they can show you a fresh load of adverts.

In the short term, its a gain for Mumsnet, but if it turns enough people off the platform, it's likely to do long term to the website. There's defintitely been a drop in overall threads started over the last 6 months or so, this change isn't going to help with that

If getting more ad views are the reason for this abomination then I will make it my mission never to buy anything I see advertised on MN.

AmeliaPMumsnet · 17/07/2026 14:40

Hi all,

Sorry for the delay in responding here, and thanks for bearing with us. We do appreciate everyone's feedback.

We're working on adding a setting that will allow you to turn off truncated posts. This isn't an instant change, but it's something we're aiming to add as soon as possible. We'll update this thread as soon as we have any news.

We've also taken on board your feedback about only truncating quoted posts, and we're looking into the issue where shorter posts are being truncated, as this shouldn't be happening.

If you spot any short posts that have been truncated when they shouldn't be, could you please share a screenshot and a link to the thread so we can investigate?

Thanks again for your patience in the meantime.

NotSoLittle · 17/07/2026 15:00

@AmeliaPMumsnet bearing in mind a number of people have said all the extra clicking is causing them physical pain because of their disabilities, please remove it completely until we can turn off this "feature" - and work on making it an opt-in feature rather than an opt-out feature.

Recklessismymiddlename · 17/07/2026 15:01

@AmeliaPMumsnet Even your post is a case in point having to click to read it all!

istherereallytimeforallthat · 17/07/2026 15:04

@AmeliaPMumsnet Please at least show all the OP's posts & updates in full. It's bad enough with people not reading their posts properly as it is, let alone if you only show part of it.

SheilaFentiman · 17/07/2026 15:07

Yy @istherereallytimeforallthat

Not sure why this development has been prioritised over a “yeet folks into a shark tank for not reading all the OP’s posts” feature… 😀

RecoIIectionsMayVary · 17/07/2026 15:20

This is a gr at example of why is is such a rubbish idea.

You should want people to read your posts

What's this 'show more/show less' nonsense for?!
cassandre · 17/07/2026 15:38

Another person here who is very frustrated by this new and cumbersome feature!

I also post and read on the 50 Books threads where many lists of titles are posted. I scroll down the page to scan the titles. If I have to click on every single post to see all the titles, that's a crazy amount of effort.

Please axe this unwelcome innovation, or make it opt-in instead of opt-out.

AmeliaPMumsnet · 17/07/2026 16:41

Hi all,

Thanks again for all the feedback you've shared over the past couple of days. We completely understand that this change isn't everyone's cup of tea, and we appreciate everyone who's taken the time to tell us what they think.

We've been reading through all of your comments, and we've decided to switch truncated posts off again while we review everything properly.

As with any new feature, it's clear that people use the site in different ways, and what's helpful for some isn't for others. That's why we're looking into adding a setting that will let you turn truncated posts off if you prefer to see everything expanded by default, rather than taking a one size fits all approach.

Thanks again for bearing with us while we work through this. We'll update this thread as soon as we have more news.

CrossPurposes · 17/07/2026 16:51

Hooray.

ratinamustardhat · 17/07/2026 16:52

Tfft. But please make it opt in, not opt out.

It's terrible website design and should never have happened in the first place.

Recklessismymiddlename · 17/07/2026 16:52

Thank goodness

Choccyp1g · 17/07/2026 16:52

Agree, it is utterly stupid.

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 17/07/2026 17:04

Thank you for the update, and for turning it off , @AmeliaPMumsnet

InLoveWithAI · 17/07/2026 17:21

Yes make it opt in.

We shouldn't have to go searching to turn something off that clearly a large part of the forum doesn't want.