Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

This site is corrupt and supports abuse of its users

98 replies

whatever4 · 15/09/2013 18:55

Hi, I just wanted to detail my recent experience on Mumsnet, at the very least there are some rogue admins here who are extremely biased/incompetent.

i posted several thoughtful posts in the current FGM discussion. Every post I made was fully within the rules, and on topic and not a single post was deleted (though admins did delete all the best posts in the thread that were written by other users).

My account was banned shortly after I received abusive personal attacks in the thread, with no action taken against the abuser who was quite clearly disrupting the discussion, and making the debate unpleasant with their breach of the site rules. it appears that others making equally civil posts have been banned too.

i made a replacement account and used this to report the posts in question as I felt staff must have missed them and made a mistake in banning me, however this account was then banned immediately after reporting the abusive posts.

Needless to say the abusive posts still remain in place without even the hint of a warning.

So in summary. Those civilly taking part in a discussion get banned from Mumsnet if their opinions aren't 100% in line with the Mumsnet feminist agenda. Similarly, basic rules such as no personal attacks do not apply if said attacks are made by a feminist towards a male. Furthermore, any victim of abuse reporting their victimisation by feminists will be banned form the site for reporting their abuse.

I'd appreciate an apology for what has occurred and for action to be taken against those making personal attacks. If , on the other hand, the above paragraph actually represents Mumnet's official site policy rather than the agenda of one rogue admin then perhaps you can please put it in writing so an right minded person knows not to use this site.

Many thanks.

OP posts:
PeteCampbellsRecedingHairline · 15/09/2013 19:34

I've just read the FGM thread and you were told numerous times to start your own thread about male circumsion.

There are no personal attacks towards you that I can see, although I presume they are the deleted posts.

If you followed the advice on that thread you would be getting a lot more support for your campaign. Maybe trying listening instead of starting threads with goady titles.

Anyway, thanks for drawing my attention to the FGM thread. I'm off to sign the petition. If you start one for males then I will sign that too.

EhricLovesTeamQhuay · 15/09/2013 19:35

Hmm looks like you were sockpuppetting.

K8Middleton · 15/09/2013 19:39

Sounds like my kind of place!

Maybe we're not for you. Have you tried Netmums? www.netmums.com.

Ledkr · 15/09/2013 19:40

Yes it does look like sock puppeting.
After the bloggers story it was highly inappropriate to try and derail the thread and talk about another subject.
That is why you were deleted and banned.

PeteCampbellsRecedingHairline · 15/09/2013 19:41

Ehric- the worst attempt at sockpuppeting ever. Grin

AlaskaNebraska · 15/09/2013 19:42

why not EMAIL them?

StickEmUp · 15/09/2013 19:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

headsspinningforachange · 15/09/2013 19:46

Try Netmums I hear they are lovely over their

K8Middleton · 15/09/2013 19:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

BOF · 15/09/2013 19:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

BOF · 15/09/2013 19:55

Who do we think us the rogue admin? Is it that Rebecca again, being all maverick? She's a crazy kid.

LeGavrOrf · 15/09/2013 19:56

I think BOF is probably right. Grin

Haha at corrupt, FFS.

BoreOfWhabylon · 15/09/2013 19:57

Or

www.goadyfuckersockpuppetsagendamuchmra.com

reelingintheyears · 15/09/2013 19:58

Grin at BoF.

MrsDeVere · 15/09/2013 19:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

reelingintheyears · 15/09/2013 19:59

Anyway, i'm glad you posted this OP. it got me over there to sign the petition which I hadn't see.
Thanks.

LeGavrOrf · 15/09/2013 19:59

I think the OP should go to divs.com

HoneyDragon · 15/09/2013 19:59

I for one am discusted and apauled at the abuse RebeccaMumsnet has just given the op.

If that's what your talking about op you are right to expose all the corruption.

reelingintheyears · 15/09/2013 20:03

Has the OP's latest incarnation been disposed of again?

How dreadfully censorial.

BoreOfWhabylon · 15/09/2013 20:03

I hear that Olivia could be bribed persuaded with gin though. Before she got upduffed, that is.

Maybe OP made a mistake and meant to say roguish admins?

WayHarshTai · 15/09/2013 20:04

Thanks for this thread, I had missed the other one and this drew my attention to it.

I found it very hard to read. How any normal thinking person could read that account and then start jumping up and down having a tantrum going wahwahwah, the way you did, baffles me.

Just a vile way to behave. You should be ashamed of yourself.

HoneyDragon · 15/09/2013 20:08

Humph. I have a MUCH, more important thread in tie stuff about the awfulness of MNHQ, and its being ignored by them in favour of old ShoutyPants up there ^

DameFanny · 15/09/2013 20:12

Damn. Anyone else tempted to register those www addresses to go to a nice ODFOD gif? Grin

DameFanny · 15/09/2013 20:12

Damn. Anyone else tempted to register those www addresses to go to a nice ODFOD gif? Grin

DameFanny · 15/09/2013 20:12

Damn. Anyone else tempted to register those www addresses to go to a nice ODFOD gif? Grin