Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

How can we manage financially as Universal Credit support reduces?

1000 replies

elliejjtiny · 26/05/2026 12:19

We have 5 dc aged between 19 and 11 all with disabilities. Dh was a manager up until youngest was born, then he became unwell and had to take a massive pay cut. I'm a Sahm and get carers allowance. We get UC. Dc1 in his first year at uni, dc2 about to start in September.

We are just about managing at the moment but barely. In September we are going to lose the child element of universal credit for dc2 and I'm worried how we are going to manage. When the dc were younger I thought I would be working by now but I'm only getting 4 hours sleep a night and my 11 year old needs constant supervision when not at school so I don't know how I could fit work in. Dh has to work away about 15 weekends a year (from friday morning until late Sunday night) which leaves me completely exhausted each time. We spend 9 weekends a year picking up/dropping off/visiting dc1 and I imagine spending the same amount of time with dc2. There is no childcare for children my dc age with SN and they have to be picked up and dropped off at school. The dc have appointments about once a week on average and dc4 stays in hospital about 1 night a year when I don't get any sleep at all.

Realistically I can't think of any employer who would employ me with the amount of time off I would need and on so little sleep. At the moment I spend the time dc are at school doing the housework, cooking the dinner and trying to catch up on a bit of sleep.

I'm trying to think of anywhere we could save money but I can't think of anything. Dc1 doesn't cost any less money while he is at uni.

OP posts:
ShutupLwren · 26/05/2026 20:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I’ve found that to be quite common in my experience. A few families I’d supported would have parents with undiagnosed Sen themselves who’s dc would often present much more severely than their parents.
My own DC are neurodivergent but one of my children is disabled due to his very limited capacity. Turns out partner and I are also ND. We had no idea, just thought we were a wee bit quirky. As it happens him having spread sheets on his favourite video game characters and writing journal entries for every film he’s watched since aged 5 or myself who kept a stray dog for 4 days in my bedroom without my parents knowing arent typical behaviour. I swear my mum actually told her colleague “lwren has been barking more than usual” and just presumed I’d taken up howling at the moon or something. My guess is, it’s genes 😁

Glowingup · 26/05/2026 20:18

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:05

Families with more than three children are statistically negligible.

Anyway you have to examine your prejudices if you think you have a right to a say about bigger families. They tend to be of minority ethnic/global majority origin. What are we saying when we criticise them?

I could only find statistics for families with 3 or more children (rather than more than 3) and 44% of these are living in poverty which is much higher than one or two child families. So it is a societal issue to decide to have far more children than you can afford to look after, especially if all of them are disabled and likely to need care long term or even for life. The majority are not from the Global South but I don’t see the difference that makes. I’m not going to pretend it’s fine and nobody else’s business for people to have too many kids, allow them to live in poverty and leave them with poor life chances.

nearlylovemyusername · 26/05/2026 20:18

FairKoala · 26/05/2026 20:06

I think the issue is the outgoings will reduce but the income reduces more.

If someone is on 4 hours sleep per night how do you hold down a full time or even a full time job?

that's what many of us do, on a regular basis. I had many years of sleep pattern like this and had to work 60 hours a week to provide for my family. Survived on coffee

JaneFondue · 26/05/2026 20:19

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:05

Families with more than three children are statistically negligible.

Anyway you have to examine your prejudices if you think you have a right to a say about bigger families. They tend to be of minority ethnic/global majority origin. What are we saying when we criticise them?

I am a global majority, ethnic minority person, of Indian heritage.My mum is one of 8. When she came to this country in the 70s, she immediately got contraception and had only 2 children. Advised me to do the same. Son preference was strong in my community back then, but my mum stuck with 2 girls and never had to go on benefits, luckily. She was able to work and study further, and encouraged me to.

The birth rate is declining even amongst ethnic minorities. No one in my family born after the 70s has more than two. We want to support them ourselves and educate them. I do not think it is racist to advocate for smaller families even in ethnic minorities.

MrsCompayson · 26/05/2026 20:19

So welfare spending for families where no one in the household who works is 2-3% total spending between £6-10 Billion per year.

(Ops husband works btw)

Pensions £146 Billion per year

Compared to tax evasion/avoidance per year £39 Billion

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:19

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:16

Unlikely that you personally are paying for other people's children. Unlikely that it could ever be your business, and it's a shame that you are so crass as to ever imagine it could be.

Likely that you disapprove of big families for particular reasons though. There is often an unpleasant undertone with busybodies like you.

Oh dear, so misguided and using erroneous arguments to not prove a point. Here we are again. Personal attacks. Predictable...people are touchy when others say the (previously) unsayable.

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:20

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:17

Also a pp explains similar on this very thread. Working does not always pay off - which is unbelievable. How can it be right that people are better off on benefits than working.

People aren't better off on benefits than working (not that it's a binary) unless they have adverse circumstances such as illness, disability or caring responsibilities. Even then, they're not necessarily better off. Disabled people and carers are disproportionately likely to live in poverty.

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:20

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:19

Oh dear, so misguided and using erroneous arguments to not prove a point. Here we are again. Personal attacks. Predictable...people are touchy when others say the (previously) unsayable.

If you say so.

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:21

JaneFondue · 26/05/2026 20:19

I am a global majority, ethnic minority person, of Indian heritage.My mum is one of 8. When she came to this country in the 70s, she immediately got contraception and had only 2 children. Advised me to do the same. Son preference was strong in my community back then, but my mum stuck with 2 girls and never had to go on benefits, luckily. She was able to work and study further, and encouraged me to.

The birth rate is declining even amongst ethnic minorities. No one in my family born after the 70s has more than two. We want to support them ourselves and educate them. I do not think it is racist to advocate for smaller families even in ethnic minorities.

That's all very interesting (genuinely) but not related to my point.

nearlylovemyusername · 26/05/2026 20:23

Lifestooshort71 · 26/05/2026 20:05

I wonder why the OP hasn't been back? 🤷‍♀️

I actually think she did. Just under different name

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:23

Glowingup · 26/05/2026 20:18

I could only find statistics for families with 3 or more children (rather than more than 3) and 44% of these are living in poverty which is much higher than one or two child families. So it is a societal issue to decide to have far more children than you can afford to look after, especially if all of them are disabled and likely to need care long term or even for life. The majority are not from the Global South but I don’t see the difference that makes. I’m not going to pretend it’s fine and nobody else’s business for people to have too many kids, allow them to live in poverty and leave them with poor life chances.

Right so you need to look at those stats with a critical eye instead of just concluding that large families equal more poverty. Who has the large families, what barriers do they face in life and in overcoming poverty, why are people having larger families, and so on. You also need to assess the extent to which large families are problematic - or not.

It's not a superficial issue.

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:24

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:20

People aren't better off on benefits than working (not that it's a binary) unless they have adverse circumstances such as illness, disability or caring responsibilities. Even then, they're not necessarily better off. Disabled people and carers are disproportionately likely to live in poverty.

Not true. They can be. Fact check yourself. But I guess you don't want to for obvious reasons.

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:25

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:24

Not true. They can be. Fact check yourself. But I guess you don't want to for obvious reasons.

As a general rule, they are not.

You want to be looking at future projections, not just immediate circumstances. After all, that's the premise of the op.

caringcarer · 26/05/2026 20:26

BountifulPantry · 26/05/2026 14:55

some of the comments on this thread are shameful.

OP, to answer your actual question:

There are logically only 3 options:

  1. spend less
  2. make more money
  3. both

Option 4 is get into debt, which is a crappy option.

I assume you’ve cut back as much as you can? In which case there is only really one option- make more money.

You’ve said you’re tired which is fair enough- sounds really tough. But could your OH do overtime? Could you do literally one shift at the weekend or on his day off? One shift at the pub on a Saturday would make a big difference. Do you have any contacts who could give you casual / ad hoc work? Can you rent a room out?

Think- how are you going to make that money as a family?

Edited

DH do overtime? He doesn't even work a 50 hour week.

Justbreathagain · 26/05/2026 20:27

I have to say I do agree with alot of other posters. 5 children is alot regardless of disabilities. You can't assume all of them are not going to have disabilities or that you will always be in the same financial position. You pushed yourself right up to your means and then lost income. Life is hard now and the state is propping you up. I have no idea why dc1 and 2 will cost more being at uni surely that less food and washing and water use etc ? And uni is expensive for everyone.. They could get part time jobs. Your youngest is 11 so sounds like they are all at school and you are cooking , cleaning and sleeping ? I get the sleep but other people leave the house a mess to get to work, use a slow cook etc, make quick and easy meals. Aswell as a zero hour or flexible jobs which do exist. All sounds like excuses i am sorry. 5 days a week they are at school or uni i assume ?

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:28

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:25

As a general rule, they are not.

You want to be looking at future projections, not just immediate circumstances. After all, that's the premise of the op.

Thanks for being honest enough to admit you were incorrect when you confidently stated 'People aren't better off on benefits than working (not that it's a binary) unless they have adverse circumstances such as illness, disability or caring responsibilities'

GiaGia16 · 26/05/2026 20:30

There is no more money coming from UC once the kids age out so the only option is to either find a job or for DH to increase his hours, Not sure what else OP realistically thought anyone could suggest.

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:31

GiaGia16 · 26/05/2026 20:30

There is no more money coming from UC once the kids age out so the only option is to either find a job or for DH to increase his hours, Not sure what else OP realistically thought anyone could suggest.

Backfill, why not

RedRock41 · 26/05/2026 20:31

3 Children on DLA + Carers Allowance, UC and a wage is not a small income all in. Some have to work and care. Appreciate it might not be as much as you have been getting OP but think of it like this, other carers might not be as ‘fortunate’. Thinking single adult who needs to care for parents or elderly relatives. You’ll find a way and not having a go but either cut back or earn. For those of us taxed to high hilt, also had one disabled child as well as 3 elderly relatives to care for on top of working 50+ hours many week also tough. Survived sometimes on no sleep. Not a competition at all but just mean don’t assume those working and caring aren’t also greatly suffering/struggling. Best wishes regardless. Life not easy.

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:32

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:28

Thanks for being honest enough to admit you were incorrect when you confidently stated 'People aren't better off on benefits than working (not that it's a binary) unless they have adverse circumstances such as illness, disability or caring responsibilities'

If that's how you interpreted it, ok.

GiaGia16 · 26/05/2026 20:33

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:31

Backfill, why not

Hoping to I’m sure

Northermcharn · 26/05/2026 20:33

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:32

If that's how you interpreted it, ok.

😂Ay ay aye

Crimpit · 26/05/2026 20:37

Glowingup · 26/05/2026 20:01

No of course not but she can stop the second youngest one going to a uni three hours away if they can’t live unsupported and she can ask the oldest one to transfer to a closer uni if they also can’t live unsupported. And it’s permissible to point out to her that this situation is of her own making and that she will need to find some way to work when her partner is home so that their income increases.

Their closest uni might not be doing their chosen course. Or that was the only one they had an offer from.

Why do people keep saying it is all her fault? On Mumsnet of all places.

horsesaanddogs · 26/05/2026 20:38

Get a job. You chose to have 5 kids.

Redty10 · 26/05/2026 20:40

ForWittyTealOP · 26/05/2026 20:16

Unlikely that you personally are paying for other people's children. Unlikely that it could ever be your business, and it's a shame that you are so crass as to ever imagine it could be.

Likely that you disapprove of big families for particular reasons though. There is often an unpleasant undertone with busybodies like you.

So who is paying for them then?
busybody! As taxpayers it definitely is our business where the money we earn through work gets spent. There is no undertone in pp’s post other than what your vivid imagination sees. You will be calling her a racist next ffs

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread