Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Lying husband

123 replies

ratcatchernot · 12/11/2026 19:19

My husband (of over ten years) and I share our finances. We have equal amount of spends for personal use. I’ve now found out he has been receiving an additional allowance from another role which he has hidden from me. Alongside that he’s been lying about his whereabouts to cover these earnings. It isn’t a great deal of money but it’s the deceit that concerns me. AIBU to think this means the trust has completely gone and I should walk away.?

OP posts:
Laura95167 · 12/11/2026 22:33

Do you know what it was spent on? Because if it was to buy your christmas gift, id be more forgiving than if it was beer float

GarlicNothing · 12/11/2026 23:06

I can't believe the number of replies saying it doesn't matter! The man's systematically lied to her for a whole year. How the hell does that not matter?

OP, it's very worrying that your husband apparently has so little respect for you, and that he's been living rent-free in your house for ten years. I'm sorry.

Glad you're going to get advice. Keep your tinder dry until you know where you stand Flowers

mybiggreenfrog · 12/11/2026 23:07

ratcatchernot · 12/11/2026 19:52

We have paid different amounts at different periods. At the moment his contributions will exceed mine but that’s not always been the case. Also I own the house we live in and he’s never paid into a mortgage rent etc as mine before we married

Have you legally protected the house you bought before you married? If not then it's 50% his by now. He should be paying towards the mortgage.

ratcatchernot · Yesterday 07:42

GarlicNothing · 12/11/2026 23:06

I can't believe the number of replies saying it doesn't matter! The man's systematically lied to her for a whole year. How the hell does that not matter?

OP, it's very worrying that your husband apparently has so little respect for you, and that he's been living rent-free in your house for ten years. I'm sorry.

Glad you're going to get advice. Keep your tinder dry until you know where you stand Flowers

Thank you. So many replies seemed to think I was being unreasonable. Your response is appreciated. X

OP posts:
ratcatchernot · Yesterday 07:43

mybiggreenfrog · 12/11/2026 23:07

Have you legally protected the house you bought before you married? If not then it's 50% his by now. He should be paying towards the mortgage.

Unfortunately not. There hadn’t been a mortgage for him to contribute towards it’s was paid outright before we met and he contributed nothing.

OP posts:
ratcatchernot · Yesterday 07:45

Laura95167 · 12/11/2026 22:33

Do you know what it was spent on? Because if it was to buy your christmas gift, id be more forgiving than if it was beer float

Definitely not on me. More likely the beer 😂

OP posts:
BigSkies2022 · Yesterday 07:51

DoAWheelie · 12/11/2026 21:39

Because you love each other want want to see each other have a full happy life where you both have access to the same amount of free time and disposable income?

Starting to think most married people on here hate their spouse tbh.

That's often what I think reading these threads! People make their relationship sound so transactional and come across as obsessed with keeping score. Maybe that isn't how they actually live, but they often make it sound like they are forever on spreadsheets and abacuses, jealously measuring every penny and moment of free time. With my first husband, we measured out money like that, but it didn't lead to greater mutual trust and respect, it was a sign that those things were absent. It's important to understand each other's financial values and priorities, and ideally share them, or at least respect and not feel threatened by them, but that's not the same thing.

OP, you are probably best off talking to your husband, maybe with some skilled therapist involved, about money, what it represents to each of you, why he's so keen to hang onto £40 a week without you knowing, and why, when you are keen to retain sole control of your much more valuable asset, this £40 a week bothers you so much. And you would be sensible to hammer out an agreement about the division of assets in the event of a divorce, because you might find your house and pensions are marital assets, no matter who worked for them and when.

BigSkies2022 · Yesterday 07:54

It is also mad that the money he has earned during the ten years of living mortgage free has not been going towards his own mortgage somewhere, because in the event the OP ever wanted to split, making her spouse homeless should not be an additional burden on her.

Junglejune · Yesterday 08:29

HappyGhost813 · 12/11/2026 21:05

I’m totally against the joint account and all money in one pot thing. Adults should have their own bank accounts and be allowed to keep their own money. All bills money should go into a joint account but what’s left should be for each person to keep in their respective accounts.

He’s done the extra hard work and earned that money so why do you assume half of it is yours? Yet you worked hard to buy your house and by the sounds of it you don’t believe he is entitled to half of it…. (which btw legally he almost definitely would be)

So you want HIM to have it both ways instead? He’s benefiting from OP’s past hard work and financial planning to the tune of probably £500-1000 a month their entire relationship already. So he’s been able to save a huge amount more money over that time, which he might otherwise not have done. But then he gets half of the house. And you want him to additionally benefit from happening to earn more now when the OP has in the past?

Anyway the OP has repeatedly emphasised it’s the deceit that has upset her not the money. I’d feel the same way. You had an agreement and he airily broke it and lied to you. I’m not sure divorce would be the initial option for me but I’d certainly be asking what else he’s been lying about and being very clear it was last chance saloon.

Has he said why he lied?

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 08:29

foursquares · 12/11/2026 21:11

No wonder he didn't tell you. He worked extra, of course it's his money. This sounds controlling and touching on financial abuse.

So for the sake of a couple of grand you’d leave, and risk losing half your home ?

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 08:50

mybiggreenfrog · 12/11/2026 23:07

Have you legally protected the house you bought before you married? If not then it's 50% his by now. He should be paying towards the mortgage.

It’s not automatically a 50/50 split. OP owns the house outright with no mortgage. Property bought or owned individually before the marriage starts is classed as non matrimonial property.

In England and Wales the courts apply the ‘Needs’ principle and their priority is meeting the housing and financial needs of both parties—especially if there are dependent children involved. Unless joint funds were used for the house purchase or major renovations, the stumbling block for OP will likely be the length of the marriage. In a long marriage where the house becomes the family home, a court is more likely to award a share to the spouse if it is necessary to make sure they are adequately rehoused on divorce.

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 08:53

PhilosophicalCheeseSandwich · 12/11/2026 21:23

But that is what he's done this time. He's kept the extra few quid from his side job. It's an extra £40 a week, literally pocket money, so I doubt he's got a thrill from not mentioning it to you.

And the fact that he lied about where he was while earning the extra ?

ratcatchernot · Yesterday 13:09

BigSkies2022 · Yesterday 07:51

That's often what I think reading these threads! People make their relationship sound so transactional and come across as obsessed with keeping score. Maybe that isn't how they actually live, but they often make it sound like they are forever on spreadsheets and abacuses, jealously measuring every penny and moment of free time. With my first husband, we measured out money like that, but it didn't lead to greater mutual trust and respect, it was a sign that those things were absent. It's important to understand each other's financial values and priorities, and ideally share them, or at least respect and not feel threatened by them, but that's not the same thing.

OP, you are probably best off talking to your husband, maybe with some skilled therapist involved, about money, what it represents to each of you, why he's so keen to hang onto £40 a week without you knowing, and why, when you are keen to retain sole control of your much more valuable asset, this £40 a week bothers you so much. And you would be sensible to hammer out an agreement about the division of assets in the event of a divorce, because you might find your house and pensions are marital assets, no matter who worked for them and when.

Thank you

OP posts:
ratcatchernot · Yesterday 13:11

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 08:50

It’s not automatically a 50/50 split. OP owns the house outright with no mortgage. Property bought or owned individually before the marriage starts is classed as non matrimonial property.

In England and Wales the courts apply the ‘Needs’ principle and their priority is meeting the housing and financial needs of both parties—especially if there are dependent children involved. Unless joint funds were used for the house purchase or major renovations, the stumbling block for OP will likely be the length of the marriage. In a long marriage where the house becomes the family home, a court is more likely to award a share to the spouse if it is necessary to make sure they are adequately rehoused on divorce.

Thank you that is my understanding also. I am hoping that with all my husbands other assets and me giving him a substantial payment that I will be able to keep the house I bought.

OP posts:
ratcatchernot · Yesterday 13:13

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 08:29

So for the sake of a couple of grand you’d leave, and risk losing half your home ?

Not for a couple of grand but for a multitude of lies then yes. Rather have to sell the house than live with a compulsive liar I’m thinking.

OP posts:
ratcatchernot · Yesterday 13:17

Junglejune · Yesterday 08:29

So you want HIM to have it both ways instead? He’s benefiting from OP’s past hard work and financial planning to the tune of probably £500-1000 a month their entire relationship already. So he’s been able to save a huge amount more money over that time, which he might otherwise not have done. But then he gets half of the house. And you want him to additionally benefit from happening to earn more now when the OP has in the past?

Anyway the OP has repeatedly emphasised it’s the deceit that has upset her not the money. I’d feel the same way. You had an agreement and he airily broke it and lied to you. I’m not sure divorce would be the initial option for me but I’d certainly be asking what else he’s been lying about and being very clear it was last chance saloon.

Has he said why he lied?

Hasn’t really said why he lied. Just that he had been foolish and apologised.

OP posts:
ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 13:21

ratcatchernot · Yesterday 13:13

Not for a couple of grand but for a multitude of lies then yes. Rather have to sell the house than live with a compulsive liar I’m thinking.

Then make sure you protect your assets as much as possible. The courts in England and Wales use a ‘Needs First’ system so it’s not automatically a fifty fifty split. If the house was yours entirely before you were married then it’s not automatically considered matrimonial property. The main things that will affect it are the contributions (financial and non financial) he’s made to the household, any contributions towards major renovations, and the length of the marriage.

The court will make the split based on each partners’ ability to rehouse themselves and any children, and the length of the marriage will be looked at here because if it’s been absorbed into a long marriage as the sole matrimonial home, then they are more likely to award your husband a proportion of it to rehouse himself. Obviously other things like income and savings are considered but a house is a major asset and if the court deems it needs to be sold to facilitate both parties adequately rehousing themselves then it really doesn’t matter who owns it.

ratcatchernot · Yesterday 13:32

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 13:21

Then make sure you protect your assets as much as possible. The courts in England and Wales use a ‘Needs First’ system so it’s not automatically a fifty fifty split. If the house was yours entirely before you were married then it’s not automatically considered matrimonial property. The main things that will affect it are the contributions (financial and non financial) he’s made to the household, any contributions towards major renovations, and the length of the marriage.

The court will make the split based on each partners’ ability to rehouse themselves and any children, and the length of the marriage will be looked at here because if it’s been absorbed into a long marriage as the sole matrimonial home, then they are more likely to award your husband a proportion of it to rehouse himself. Obviously other things like income and savings are considered but a house is a major asset and if the court deems it needs to be sold to facilitate both parties adequately rehousing themselves then it really doesn’t matter who owns it.

Thank you that is re-assuring. I appreciate your response.

OP posts:
Endorewitch · Yesterday 13:44

So true . Marriage doesn't mean being joined at the hip. It doesn't mean having no personal pocket money. Thefe is always leeway in financial thinking. Women often squrrel a little away towards an emervency fund. They don't tell their partners.
I assume he didn't tell her because he is a coward who hates contrintation. Not a seasoned liar. Surely marriage doesn't mean you cannot retain a certain amount of privacy.

Cherrysoup · Yesterday 14:03

ratcatchernot · 12/11/2026 21:10

I suppose because when I did the extra hard work he expected to get half of my money! It was an agreement made as the best way for both of us to manage the finances and I kept the agreement. I don’t want to share half my house as I worked extra hard for thirty years to buy it before I knew him.

You’re very naive if you think you could keep the house without him challenging you for 50% in the case of a divorce. How long has he been earning his undeclared extra cash?

Laura95167 · Yesterday 16:02

ratcatchernot · Yesterday 07:45

Definitely not on me. More likely the beer 😂

Then I think its reasonable to raging.

Theres a difference between a good secret and a bad one. I would have said over reaction if it was for a gift for you or a romantic or family experience.

But hes taking advantage of your generosity to financially benefit him. Which alone is a bit shit, added to all the lying to explain his time away. To me this would be minimally counselling or him looking for somewhere else to stay until he proves hes not a liar

ratcatchernot · Yesterday 17:08

Laura95167 · Yesterday 16:02

Then I think its reasonable to raging.

Theres a difference between a good secret and a bad one. I would have said over reaction if it was for a gift for you or a romantic or family experience.

But hes taking advantage of your generosity to financially benefit him. Which alone is a bit shit, added to all the lying to explain his time away. To me this would be minimally counselling or him looking for somewhere else to stay until he proves hes not a liar

Thank you

OP posts:
foursquares · Yesterday 19:07

ThreadGuardDog · Yesterday 08:29

So for the sake of a couple of grand you’d leave, and risk losing half your home ?

He worked hard for this money, now his DP wants half. This isn't from his normal salary

New posts on this thread. Refresh page