Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Bonnie Blue should be arrested?

256 replies

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:40

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

OP posts:
ilbehonest · 11/09/2026 10:42

I haven't seen this but wtf that makes me feel sick. Surely that's child S Abuse?

Sartre · 11/09/2026 10:42

I don’t think it’s a real baby in any of the photos, it looks like a doll.

overnightangel · 11/09/2026 10:45

Beyond vile. Needs investigating pronto and the baby placed elsewhere

PollyBell · 11/09/2026 10:46

Ok arrested foe what? Specifically name what she can be arrested for

ilbehonest · 11/09/2026 10:47

PollyBell · 11/09/2026 10:46

Ok arrested foe what? Specifically name what she can be arrested for

if you like take a photo of a minor and it's to promote sex content that's illegal isn't it? child porn? that's what it sounds like 🤢

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:47

The fact that she might be using a doll doesn’t change my view very much. The whole point is that she is deliberately presenting it as her newborn baby and has gone as far to blur the baby/doll’s face. If it is a doll, she still wants us to believe that she has brought her newborn into this sexual content to shock people and generate publicity. The intention is still to sexualise the child. That is not a safe environment for a child.

OP posts:
teaandtoastwithmarmite · 11/09/2026 10:48

I think it’s rage bait. I don’t think she’s had a baby

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 10:50

I contacted the NSPCC last week about this. The video is repugnant. And she's not just talking about sexual contact. She says explicitly that she doesn't have to heed the 'no sexual intercourse for six weeks' rule because she had a C-section ie 'here I am guys. My vagina's ready for you'. Having intercourse would put her at risk because her body is recovering from surgery. If she were injured, she may not be able to look after the baby.

To be reported to the police, she would need to have committed an offense. Has she? I don't know.

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 10:50

Can you report her personally? Ive said this elsewhere like most posters if that baby is real it is not safe ! Any man responding to her post should also be reported for viewing some sort of indecency law.

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 10:50

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 10:50

I contacted the NSPCC last week about this. The video is repugnant. And she's not just talking about sexual contact. She says explicitly that she doesn't have to heed the 'no sexual intercourse for six weeks' rule because she had a C-section ie 'here I am guys. My vagina's ready for you'. Having intercourse would put her at risk because her body is recovering from surgery. If she were injured, she may not be able to look after the baby.

To be reported to the police, she would need to have committed an offense. Has she? I don't know.

Well done 👏.

ilbehonest · 11/09/2026 10:51

The sad truth is if it was any random person who was putting these photos on their Snapchat for example they would be investigated... but being in the public eye and broadcasting it apparently is acceptable!?

Somethinggg · 11/09/2026 10:52

teaandtoastwithmarmite · 11/09/2026 10:48

I think it’s rage bait. I don’t think she’s had a baby

Likewise.

ilbehonest · 11/09/2026 10:52

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 10:50

Can you report her personally? Ive said this elsewhere like most posters if that baby is real it is not safe ! Any man responding to her post should also be reported for viewing some sort of indecency law.

Edited

that's what I thought aswel...

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 10:53

ilbehonest · 11/09/2026 10:51

The sad truth is if it was any random person who was putting these photos on their Snapchat for example they would be investigated... but being in the public eye and broadcasting it apparently is acceptable!?

But she is a random person just because she organises "events" and posts on the Internet doesn't mean she isn't a random.

Isittimeformynapyet · 11/09/2026 10:53

I think everything she does is grotesque, but if it's a police matter it will be picked up probably before the day is out. The NSPCC won't hesitate to involve the police if a crime has been committed (I hope!)

Annoyingly, actions have very specific details to adhere to in order to be classes as an actionable "crime".

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 10:54

ilbehonest · 11/09/2026 10:52

that's what I thought aswel...

I would have thought, I edited my post because I wasn't sure of the wording.

BrassOlive · 11/09/2026 10:54

I'm sure she thinks she's clever using a doll but I wonder if that might be considered making a pseudo-image of a child?

Dweetfidilove · 11/09/2026 10:57

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 10:50

I contacted the NSPCC last week about this. The video is repugnant. And she's not just talking about sexual contact. She says explicitly that she doesn't have to heed the 'no sexual intercourse for six weeks' rule because she had a C-section ie 'here I am guys. My vagina's ready for you'. Having intercourse would put her at risk because her body is recovering from surgery. If she were injured, she may not be able to look after the baby.

To be reported to the police, she would need to have committed an offense. Has she? I don't know.

Well done, Ida.
I heard of it yesterday on the radio. Apparently the Conservative Party have also reported her, and I entirely agree with all Kemi Badenoch said yesterday.
It is utterly disgusting behaviour, and I hope the authorities investigate this thoroughly.

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 10:57

BrassOlive · 11/09/2026 10:54

I'm sure she thinks she's clever using a doll but I wonder if that might be considered making a pseudo-image of a child?

It isn't even a "grey area" is it ?

Emowoman90 · 11/09/2026 10:59

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:40

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

I believe it's a doll she's using and not her actual baby if she has a baby because I think she's just rage baiting but even so she's still using a "baby like existence to promote her disgusting sexual content which for me is vile beyond belief!

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:59

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 10:50

I contacted the NSPCC last week about this. The video is repugnant. And she's not just talking about sexual contact. She says explicitly that she doesn't have to heed the 'no sexual intercourse for six weeks' rule because she had a C-section ie 'here I am guys. My vagina's ready for you'. Having intercourse would put her at risk because her body is recovering from surgery. If she were injured, she may not be able to look after the baby.

To be reported to the police, she would need to have committed an offense. Has she? I don't know.

Thank you for doing this. You have prompted me to take action as well. I will be writing to my MP and also contacting the NSPCC. It’s not enough for be outraged about this, those of us who have any concern for that child should take action.

OP posts:
notanothernamesurely · 11/09/2026 11:00

Narcissism.

I’m also not convinced she ever had a baby - although it’s an elaborate lie to keep up! Regardless - the video is disturbing and people are right to raise concerns; advertising that you are happy to prostitute yourself again whilst holding a new born baby is just awful.

PollyBell · 11/09/2026 11:00

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:47

The fact that she might be using a doll doesn’t change my view very much. The whole point is that she is deliberately presenting it as her newborn baby and has gone as far to blur the baby/doll’s face. If it is a doll, she still wants us to believe that she has brought her newborn into this sexual content to shock people and generate publicity. The intention is still to sexualise the child. That is not a safe environment for a child.

So what can she be arrested for

SodaPopBop · 11/09/2026 11:01

Somethinggg · 11/09/2026 10:52

Likewise.

Whether her actual baby has been born is irrelevant. She’s either pregnant or post partum, and she will have a baby at some point.

PensionPTake · 11/09/2026 11:02

Perhaps she'll prompt some new legislation. I imagine if it is a doll it might not fall under current laws but I'd hope a real baby being used to promote sex would be accounted for somewhere in current legislation.

Swipe left for the next trending thread