AIBU to think Bonnie Blue should be arrested?

[BellesAndGraces]

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

As vile as she is i despair at how many equally vile men are prepared to be part of this whole disgusting circus. Wish there was a law that could see them arrested 😤😡

Could her video be reported to ofcom ?

I don't think porn, sex dolls, sex work etc should be legal at all.

I agree and I mentioned the men on my post every disgusing man who "likes" and "shares" her video should be looked at.

Take the baby off her & let her destroy herself and get infected. Make sure the baby is safe & anonymous and never discovers the vile parent

Again what about the legions of men making this profitable?

And I think everyone horrified by this should do a little peruse of pornhub and see what the content promotes, you’ll see plenty of people being marketed as underage with teddy bears and all sorts of childlike props. I understand the revulsion but Bonnie Blue has isn’t the problem in society she is the symptom and people are only so shocked by her because they are ignorant to what is going on.

There is a law in the pipeline. Info is here.

New law to ban depraved child-like sexual abuse dolls - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

She alleged to have given birth at st Mary’s - surely if this is untrue they could confirm she was not a patient.

I’m holding out hope that it isn’t a real baby (although the connotations of what she is doing and selling with a ‘baby’ is disturbing). Not seen the C-section scar thing but if she was actually postpartum wouldn’t she have done a whole “oh no, look how big my boobs are as my milk has come in” type thing.

Morally it certainly feels wrong, but legally I think it falls into loopholes. It will almost certainly be a baby doll, it is a promotion video rather than sexual content, it feels icky but I suspect reports will all come back NFA.

Love her or hate her she is very clever, she knows exactly how to make money and has a whole team behind her ensuring she stays on the right side of the law while flirting right with that line.

Several people wanting her arrested but unclear as to what law she has broken.

There is no specific offence of using a child to promote sexual content.

The image is not pornographic under the current definition. It may be indecent, but I'm not convinced it passes the test. If she is actually holding a doll as some have suggested, it is definitely not an indecent image of a child.

I'm sure she thinks she's clever using a doll but I wonder if that might be considered making a pseudo-image of a child?

No. The offence of making an indecent image covers pseudo photographs, i.e. an image made by CGI or similar that appears to be a photograph. However, as the law stands, a genuine photograph using a doll cannot be an indecent image of a child, no matter how realistic the doll. The photograph must be of an actual child.

Any man responding to her post should also be reported for viewing some sort of indecency law.

Viewing and responding to her post is not an offence.

If that is really a baby in the photo, it raises safeguarding concerns. But for anyone to be arrested, there has to be an actual crime. I think what she's done is disgusting, but I'm not convinced it is a crime as the law stands. Maybe the law should change so that this is a crime, but that won't result in her being arrested as criminal laws are not retrospective.

I think you are unreasonable to give her this publicity

They probably can't either way because of patient confidentiality or something,

In the longer term, she must be damaging herself, both physically or mentally.

Then by process of elimination it would be confirmed . If they cannot comment she was/is a patient. If she’s not they can say so and they aren’t breaking any confidentiality.

The private wing at st Mary’s is a business surely they wouldn’t not want their name dragged into all this ?

Child abuse.

I think its a massive safeguarding red flag.

Not sure if its an actual crime or not.

I think if she was a man she would have 100% been arrested by now.

She has sexualised her pregnancy and now bringing the baby into her sexual videos.

When you consider all the things she has done - (not an exhaustive list , I'm sure theres more)
the students "come and shag BB and consent to be filmed"
the "Barely Legal" young virgin boys have their first sexual experience with a porn star who doesn't say no
to "Barely Breathing" she's not phase by the upper age level
"Father and Son"
"Bonnie Blue Petting Zoo"
The 1000 Men in 12 hours
The 100 Male Porn Stars
The Golden Shower and "Food Mixed with Semen"
The Semen Bath
The Breeding Event - 400 blokes one would get her pregnant , they took details and DNA . Obviously its the bloke who equajulates plastic jizz
The filming in a set like a classroom with porn actors who all dressed as school pupils . They looked younger than they were .
And don't forget ladies if you a menstruating , you don't need to turn your fella down , you have two other orifices

So now , she wants to have the opputunity to let men have sex with a post partum woman while declaring her delight that "everything is fine down there"

Baby Blue was meant to be due end Oct. So her delivery date is 32 weeks . That is not a 32 week baby . Look how it holds itself , arms and legs stiff and flexed . Any new baby especially premature will curl itself up .
It would be small.

That is not a baby , that is a vile publicity stunt that she can push the next frontier on.
She has done many vile things . But she has a limited time to be current .
She needs to find the next shock value

She'll be crowing jubilant about her great trick then might go offand have a real baby once she's bored or her fans are bored of her .

I think she plays a character and a lot of her stuff is staged. But it should not be allowed to be out there at all, it’s just sick and disgusting. __

I can’t see how the baby can be real, if it was surely she would have had some time off. She’s rich she could have had a lovely maternity leave so on that point I feel like perhaps it’s not true.

If she’s did have a baby then I just wonder why if she’s more interested in her content. Seems a bit of a pointless life decision.

Male poster for clarity.

She is doing very well financially (for some mad reason), why in the hell anyone has any interest at all in her or anything she "creates" blows my mind.

But unfortunately a large group of men do enjoy it.

Anyway, short version being that she very likely has a legal team employed who know exactly what she can and cant get away with posting to stay just the right side of the law.

As disgusting as the post sounds (I have not seen it and have zero interest in looking) I suspect she has made sure it is legal and there is nothing that can be done to stop her.

I don’t know about the imagery legislation people are mentioning, but child protection don’t involve themselves if there isn't an actual child. If it's ragebait, and I'm inclined to agree, there would be nothing for them to do.

She’s done literal porn videos that annyone can find online, fully naked presumably. And she’s shown her bump on YouTube in a bikini. There’s something seriously wrong with you if you’re still in denial at this point.