AIBU to think Bonnie Blue should be arrested?

[BellesAndGraces]

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

She is a content creator. AI is used. It is just to create internet "clicks" (also known as revenue). She has just managed to get some time on Mumsnet- next she will be quoted on X or Fb with the responses here added.

The photograph must be of an actual child.

Just to add to my last post, some may consider that the law is a bit odd in this area. When dealing with an indecent pseudo photograph, the image only has to give the impression that it shows a child, and it can do so even if the child in the image has some adult characteristics. However, when dealing with an actual photograph, it is only an offence if it shows an actual child.

I think Bonnie will have a legal team around her advising her on what she can and cannot get away with legally.
I can't think what offence this would be covered by under The Sexual Offences Act.
Also if it is a doll, as I suspect then there isn't a victim. The CPS are hardly likely to take on a victimless case where no indictable offence has been committed.
Having said the above, I think she is sick and needs help.

She needs to be locked up for the good of society and everyone.

I believe it's a doll. That said, if a man was posting suggestive/sexual content with a doll, I would hope he would at least be investigated. I genuinely hope the whole pregnancy was a fake. The photo of her "new born" also looks like a doll. I have yet to see a convincing pic of said baby.

There is something very seriously wrong with that woman and absolutely I would have major concerns over her being responsible for a child. Plenty of sick men will believe (or want to believe) that it is her baby in these photos and they will be indulging their sick fantasies about that. It turns my stomach.

It looks like a doll but if she does actually have a real baby she is still indirectly involving her child in porn promotion by making the porn consumers think it is an image of that child.
The only way she isn't guilty of harm to a child is if she completely lied about having a baby in the first place. Even then she has moved into an extreme dark area of porn where she is trying to encourage men who are interested in children. That in itself deserves punishment

This may be an offence under s127 of the Communications Act 2003
”(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or
(b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.”

I think it is the legislation around online communications that is likely to be the only route.

Outraging public decency will not apply because that relates to a physical public place not online.

I did wonder about the pregnancy actually to, I have no idea if she really had a baby or not but as someone that does what she does I would be very surprised if she wasnt shit hot with contraception

Incredibly realistic bumps exist now, including ones with navel piercings as she posted. I’m pretty certain it’s all some elaborate fucked up hoax and there’s no baby at all. No idea why St Mary’s wouldn’t say anything about it though, they really ought to.

She’s using child imagery to promote her sex work. At the very least SS should be involved with her if she hasn’t committed a crime, but I’m sure there must be something she can be arrested for. Public decency laws?

I don't think this can be assumed.

It's possible they have a policy of never commenting anyway. Which would be sensible enough. But even assuming they'd say if she was never a patient, St Mary's is a big hospital and the private Lindo bit does more than just births. She could've gone there sometime for a non obstetric gynaecology matter, for example. Any kind of comment would be opening a potential can of worms.

But if she hasn’t been treated there surely they wouldn’t just allow their name to be used as part of some kind of fake birth fraud?

I don't think there's any 'surely' there, no. She could've had other treatment there anyway. But even if she hasn't, I think it's plausible that a place with such high profile clientele might have policies that emphasise discretion and privacy.

At the very least, them not coming out and saying she didn't give birth there can't be assumed to mean she did.

Anyone can make a report about any child they feel is in danger.

But under what section of The Police And Criminal Evidence Act?
You can't just lock people up because you don't like them or disagree with what they do.
I also think she is vile, but have some understanding on how the police and CPS work

She wants and needs publicity and, guess what OP, that's exactly what you've done.

Yeah. Vile clown

You may well be right. In which case she is prompting well-meaning members of the public to contact social services and the police, thus taking up precious public resources needed by real children and adults in actual need or and / or danger.

The baby she's holding might not be real but I believe she was definitely pregnant and gave birth a while ago. She was doing full on "pregnant porn" videos with a very visible belly. You can't fake that. Unfortunately pregnant porn is a popular genre. And not illegal. She's been spotted out and about near where she lives with a baby strapped to her as well. I think she gave birth earlier than she has let on so the timeline is off but there is a baby. She is a sicko no doubt.

It shouldnt be that difficult.to find out if she really had a child. Someone must know if she did.

The 6 week rule is around the gaping wound left by the plancenta in uterus mostly, and fact cervix is open even slightly so can let infection through and blood loss as it heals…that still happens with c-section…even with a planned section the uterus is still highly prone to infection

the c section wound itself is a different equally silly risk, bit in truth that doesn’t heal properly in terms of muscles wall for months, so probably after a month it’s going to be sore for ages anyway if too adventurous sex! as would be her having sex if she’d had stitches from tearing given birth vaginally

I don't think she had a baby either.

I thought she said in an interview that she couldn't have children for some reason? I thought that possibly explained what she started doing, if she had wanted them... a trauma response. Also seems strange to me, if she could have kids, that she never got pregnant sooner. No way everyone used a condom and used it properly and even if combined with the rhythm method, that's an excessive lifestyle... pregnancy would still be likelier than not in a healthy, fertile young woman.

Remember ..all publicity is good publicity
why give this air time?

Men (some not all I know) are such dogs. Lining up to have sex, along with hundreds of others, posing in a picture with a baby and being seemingly happy to do it, and then others paying to watch it.
I was watching a documentary the other day, and they were talking to a sex worker, drug addled, black teeth, covered in bruises, and men were paying her for sex .. repulsive.