Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Bonnie Blue should be arrested?

263 replies

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:40

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

OP posts:
Opus3 · 11/09/2026 11:27

Never thought I'd see the day I agreed with Kemi.

Minasama · 11/09/2026 11:27

Goodness me, that’s awful. Surely masked men will frighten a baby.
It sounds totally warped and one can only assume this woman has severe mental health problems.

OtterlyAstounding · 11/09/2026 11:27

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 10:50

I contacted the NSPCC last week about this. The video is repugnant. And she's not just talking about sexual contact. She says explicitly that she doesn't have to heed the 'no sexual intercourse for six weeks' rule because she had a C-section ie 'here I am guys. My vagina's ready for you'. Having intercourse would put her at risk because her body is recovering from surgery. If she were injured, she may not be able to look after the baby.

To be reported to the police, she would need to have committed an offense. Has she? I don't know.

The reason not to have sex for six weeks post birth doesn't specifically relate to vaginal trauma afaik, but is because you have a bloody great wound in your uterus where the placenta detached, and could get an infection.

So c section or not, you're supposed to wait until your lochia (post birth discharge) is no longer bloody.

That aside, I think it's all ragebait, and there's no actual baby. She's just trying to drum up publicity, and appeal to men with paedophiliac fetishes. Utterly disgusting, but probably not illegal.

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 11:28

user1464187087 · 11/09/2026 11:22

I don't think that she has had a baby, I don't think it is a real baby in the photos. She is just doing this for publicity and it is clearly working.
I don't know why people believe what she says. Admittedly she is very strange / damaged.

But i dont think you can legally make these kinds of images . They've just banned the private possession of childlike dolls somewhere, so I would have thought the same thing applied here even if it is a plastic baby in the image. I think she needs to be prosecuted.

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 11:28

Minasama · 11/09/2026 11:27

Goodness me, that’s awful. Surely masked men will frighten a baby.
It sounds totally warped and one can only assume this woman has severe mental health problems.

Why aren't her parents stepping in? It's said her mum supports what she does online though.

Palomiino · 11/09/2026 11:29

Opus3 · 11/09/2026 11:27

Never thought I'd see the day I agreed with Kemi.

Right?!

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 11:30

PollyBell · 11/09/2026 10:46

Ok arrested foe what? Specifically name what she can be arrested for

Paedophilia

EmmaOfNormandy · 11/09/2026 11:30

BellesAndGraces · 11/09/2026 10:40

Bonnie Blue’s latest stunt is to post a video holding her newborn, surrounded by masked men while talking about getting back to making sexual content after having a c-section. Her baby’s onesie matches the colour of the mask worn by the men.

How this is not using a baby to promote sexual content, I do not know. It’s sickening.

I know all she wants is publicity but I sincerely hope this time she gets all the attention she deserves and her baby is taken away from her and placed with a family that can give the child the love, care and protection a child needs. The Tories have reported her to the NSPCC but why has she not been reported to the police??

Seems to be part of the narrative to get us used to being protected by masked men.

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 11:31

Opus3 · 11/09/2026 11:27

Never thought I'd see the day I agreed with Kemi.

Me too, but here we are.

LilyBunch25 · 11/09/2026 11:31

The most disturbing picture for me is the one where the 3 men are holding and looking down at the 'baby' It is chilling.

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 11/09/2026 11:31

ilbehonest · 11/09/2026 10:47

if you like take a photo of a minor and it's to promote sex content that's illegal isn't it? child porn? that's what it sounds like 🤢

It's not illegal to talk about sex in the presence of a newborn. If it genuinely was her baby and not a doll then social services should be getting involved and they will consult with specialist police but that in itself isn't a criminal offence.

Whatonearthwoman · 11/09/2026 11:31

One day she will be a washed up used nobody with serious mental problems.
I know there is an ex pornstar romana ryder/lawson and her life is a complete disaster now, think shes in prison. Her young child i feel sorry for.
Bonnie blue aka tia billinger is an utter disgrace!

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 11:32

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 11:30

Paedophilia

It would be difficult to prove she has a sexual interest in children from the film she's posted.

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 11:32

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 11:31

Me too, but here we are.

Ditto. Dont like kemi but would be pleased if she somehow got this clown prosecuted.

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 11/09/2026 11:32

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 11:30

Paedophilia

It's not sexual activity to talk about sex in front of a baby though. It's vile and it's rage bait but not a crime.

Lifeomars · 11/09/2026 11:35

She is truly repellent. I'm assuming that if that is (hopefully) a doll she is still promoting sex using an image or representation of a child and that in itself is illegal. She's also promoting the dangerous idea that women who have had c sections are cleared for sex which given that they will still be bleeding, healing internally and externally, is a dangerous precedent and gives no consideration to how they are feeling emotionally. Imagine all the vile blokes seeing this and thinking that all women are up for it as soon as the placenta is delivered.

ilbehonest · 11/09/2026 11:35

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 10:53

But she is a random person just because she organises "events" and posts on the Internet doesn't mean she isn't a random.

ummm I disagree it's like the mccans, they didn't get done for neglect leaving children asleep and going off for dinner if it were me you or someone who wasn't blown up in the media in sure we'd have been prosecuted.

She has publicity on her side is what I'm trying to say.

It's amazing though how many people in the public eye later come out as child abusers, sexual abusers or just abusers in general. It wouldn't surprise me if this was another case years down the line.

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 11:36

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 11:32

It would be difficult to prove she has a sexual interest in children from the film she's posted.

There are laws around what you can show. I havent seen it but i'm pretty sure if she is showing the image of a baby, real or plastic, next to.masked men then you'd have a pretty strong case that that is a deliberately created sexual context and prosecutable. I'm.not a lawyer but I'd like to hear the argument that it isnt paedophilia.

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 11:37

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 11/09/2026 11:32

It's not sexual activity to talk about sex in front of a baby though. It's vile and it's rage bait but not a crime.

It is against the law to have children involved in your filmed promotion of sexual activity though,

Lomonald · 11/09/2026 11:38

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 11:36

There are laws around what you can show. I havent seen it but i'm pretty sure if she is showing the image of a baby, real or plastic, next to.masked men then you'd have a pretty strong case that that is a deliberately created sexual context and prosecutable. I'm.not a lawyer but I'd like to hear the argument that it isnt paedophilia.

Well yes this.

Holeymoley28 · 11/09/2026 11:39

I don’t think she had a baby and that’s it’s rage baiting with a doll.

I don’t think there is anything currently legally she has done wrong either.

She’s likely just staying the right side of the line legally.

She’s vile and clearly has some mental health issues. If I remember correctly her parents actually help with the videos and shoots so they won’t be saving her as they are bank rolled by her.

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2026 11:39

Daygloboo · 11/09/2026 11:36

There are laws around what you can show. I havent seen it but i'm pretty sure if she is showing the image of a baby, real or plastic, next to.masked men then you'd have a pretty strong case that that is a deliberately created sexual context and prosecutable. I'm.not a lawyer but I'd like to hear the argument that it isnt paedophilia.

I hope that's the case.

Hedgehogforshort · 11/09/2026 11:41

Outraging public decency is a common law criminal offence

she could be prosecuted for that.

Strawberryfruitstarburst · 11/09/2026 11:42

I find it batshit that because of the internet, we are exposed to such bullshit.. Everyone should just forget she exists and ignore her and live outside of the internet.

She needs attention to be famous.
The internet is full of sexual predators, is everyone going to make it their business to go after them too? Or is it just because the internet and people like Bonnie have tricked people into focusing on her?

PlantainArama · 11/09/2026 11:42

I too think the whole thing is rage bait.

However, I also think that as she's presenting it as "truth" it needs to be taken at face value.

Child protection services operate with a lower burden of proof than criminal prosecution requires and the aim is to keep children safe, not secure convictions.

Regardless of the safety of a potentially fictional baby, the video crosses disturbing boundaries re children and sex.