Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be sick of politicians using 'fairness' as justification for tax rises?

605 replies

Itchthescratch · 21/07/2026 07:46

Fairness is completely subjective and I notice that this is often shorthand for giving more money to those that contribute the least.

Of course there will always be those that can't contribute much due to factors outside of their control, but we are kidding ourselves if we pretend that there aren't already lots of people that are scraping by doing the bare minimum (sometimes even less) and making completely irresponsible decisions knowing the state will ultimately insulate them from the consequences.

I personally know people that have had lots of children that they can't afford and can't parent properly simply because they wanted to. They are now on an incredible amount of money as the two child cap has been lifted. I know people that have stopped working because they weren't much better off than being on benefits and they couldn't be bothered with the hassle. I know young people that are already planning to stay on disability benefits their whole lives for mental health issues as they want to stay home and game.

Is it really 'fair' to charge the rest of us more to subsidise all of this?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Itchthescratch · 26/07/2026 06:39

OriginalUsername2 · 26/07/2026 00:20

I don’t think the poll holds much weight statistically.

It's as valid as any other poll on this forum. Yougov and other major pollsters have covered many adjacent questions and show that again, the majority of the population generally agree with me:

https://yougov.com/en-gb/trackers/do-brits-think-that-benefits-are-too-high
https://yougov.com/en-gb/trackers/are-we-taxing-and-spending-the-right-amount

Do Brits think that benefits are too high? 2019-2026

And thinking about the level of benefits, do you think they are too high, too low, or is the balance about right?

https://yougov.com/en-gb/trackers/do-brits-think-that-benefits-are-too-high

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 26/07/2026 07:36

You can get any poll result you want if you phrase the questions in the right way and/or ask a group of people who know nothing whatsoever about what they’re being asked.

ClarkeandNewman · 26/07/2026 09:17

Itchthescratch · 26/07/2026 06:31

This is such a terrible analogy. It's a thread I started and have been active on throughout , I have been quoted often by the poster who has been unbelievably goady.

I haven't been anything of the sort.

ClarkeandNewman · 26/07/2026 09:20

Itchthescratch · 26/07/2026 06:39

It's as valid as any other poll on this forum. Yougov and other major pollsters have covered many adjacent questions and show that again, the majority of the population generally agree with me:

https://yougov.com/en-gb/trackers/do-brits-think-that-benefits-are-too-high
https://yougov.com/en-gb/trackers/are-we-taxing-and-spending-the-right-amount

That says a lot about political and media discourse during the time period specified. It's very interesting to see the after effects of austerity rhetoric.

SleeplessInWherever · 26/07/2026 15:12

Itchthescratch · 25/07/2026 18:53

I wanted to discuss specifically how I was sick of politicians like Andy Burnham and Keir Starmer talking about people paying their 'fair' share which always means tax rises for the same groups of people. Meanwhile we have people absolutely not paying their fair share or contributing anything at all and yet politicians are generally silent on them.

I don't need to discuss my views on welfare reform or how we need to tackle the spiralling cost of disability on this thread. This thread is first about politicians acknowledging there are very obvious and serious issues around lack of contribution from some within our society and this needs to be brought into the fairness conversation before we start insinuating that people who are already paying an awful lot aren't paying enough to cover their 'fair' share. Call a spade a spade. Some are paying a lot and need to pay more to cover those who can't but also those that won't contribute much at all but want to take an awful lot.

Okay.

Andy Burnham has been PM for all of 5mins, so I doubt he’s had much of an impact yet.

It seems pointless to me discussing how we’re being asked to pay (more than) our fair share, but not discuss why - what it’s going on and how that money could be better spent.

Do you have any particular ideas on how to encourage the takers to put in their fair share, at least?

If the British public do think benefits are too high, it surely is more productive to discuss what we can do about that, to either lower the bill or spread it more widely?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page