Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Andy Burnham might call a general election soon?

664 replies

Mywishistoclimbthe3peaks · 20/07/2026 00:56

To think Andy Burnham will call a general election before Christmas? Yes it would be a massive roll of the dice but,

Reform - don't have the numbers for a GE and there's all frog faces suspicious money bringing him a lot of heat.

Torys - kemi doesn't have a lot of depth, I feel and she hasn't changed much in the polls. She's good at the dispatch box but let's face it anyone could stand up and insult the other side.

By calling a GE Andy would have his own mandate and break the deadlock of the back benchers.

Not being unreasonable = he needs to call a GE

Your being unreasonable = Robotic Kier and Ratchet Reeves have gone and Andy just needs to get on with it now.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 16:51

Mywishistoclimbthe3peaks · 20/07/2026 16:48

I'm not convinced on that point. If Andy can make a stronger case for Labour who knows they could swing it. Stranger things have happened. I also think two party politics have had their day Kemi is a strong speaker but nothing much else to convince me to vote for her. One things for sure we are in a completely new era of politics. Very interesting.

Fair enough but, in the broader sweep, I am of the belief that the UK wants less socialism, not more - and I don’t see Burnham being able to deliver that - quite the opposite, in fact.

Tactical voting will see to the rest.

Just my view you understand.

CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 16:52

LuckyHazelFox · 20/07/2026 16:50

His cabinet plans are taking a rethink. He's running two hours behind. Not a good start. Rayner can't wait to skip down the street though. That will be sickening.

Very true.

Rayner, FGS…

Is there any question, where the best/correct answer is Angela Rayner?

LuckyHazelFox · 20/07/2026 16:54

CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 16:52

Very true.

Rayner, FGS…

Is there any question, where the best/correct answer is Angela Rayner?

I would say but there would be tears and tantrums. I haven't got the energy to deal with hypocrites right now.

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 16:55

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 16:48

Once again, don't include me in the 'you' of Labour supporters. I am a floating voter and you don't know who I've most recently chosen for what. You are not going to do the you only disagree with something stupid I've said because you're a Labour supporter routine here. @CagneyLacey just want to highlight this bit to you as well.

And either way, Labour didn't set the scene. The only way this could be true is if you included people who are literally MPs and activists for other movements in 'Labour' which is obviously batshit. They simply didn't have that level of influence.

Edited

Labour online, ie supporters as in mn, btl and social media sites. Not the party.

They hounded of course and enjoyed the outcome. The pp said that hounding should now stop, it won’t and it’s hypocritical of those who joined in who say the same.

BIossomtoes · 20/07/2026 16:56

CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 16:48

If this is the best day for a long time - I think that’s a savage indictment on the last two years….

LOL.

I didn’t say how long. ☺️

CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 16:59

The new prime minister also left the door open to reintroducing a 50p top rate of income tax on the highest earners, despite the move being explicitly ruled out in Labour’s last election manifesto.

Go on Burnham, do it - swing left son.

FFSItsTooHot · 20/07/2026 17:00

I hope not because I've a nasty feeling that Reform will win.

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 17:01

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 16:55

Labour online, ie supporters as in mn, btl and social media sites. Not the party.

They hounded of course and enjoyed the outcome. The pp said that hounding should now stop, it won’t and it’s hypocritical of those who joined in who say the same.

Yep, don't disagree with any of this. It's the bit about this specific group of online supporters setting the scene when this sort of whining was done well before them that was wrong.

BermudaRhombus · 20/07/2026 17:03

BIossomtoes · 20/07/2026 16:40

On the contrary. I for one am having an absolutely fabulous day. A new PM who gives me hope, filled with enthusiasm and rolling up his sleeves. Quite honestly it’s the best day I’ve had for a looooong time.

I remember that: when a new PM comes into power and you actually believe all the hype and promises. I think everyone goes through that phase.

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:05

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 17:01

Yep, don't disagree with any of this. It's the bit about this specific group of online supporters setting the scene when this sort of whining was done well before them that was wrong.

At partygate it became more about the every day poster hounding, which the op wants to stop. That happened recently and Labourites embraced it, set it up as a way social media would be. Delighted at how much it could impact politics.

That is now aimed at their party.

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 17:07

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:05

At partygate it became more about the every day poster hounding, which the op wants to stop. That happened recently and Labourites embraced it, set it up as a way social media would be. Delighted at how much it could impact politics.

That is now aimed at their party.

Embracing it doesn't mean they set the scene.

What is the 'it' you think Labour supporters online set up and what does set up mean in that context specifically? Using standard definitions of the term.

Binnyforthewin · 20/07/2026 17:07

LuckyHazelFox · 20/07/2026 16:50

His cabinet plans are taking a rethink. He's running two hours behind. Not a good start. Rayner can't wait to skip down the street though. That will be sickening.

If she brings her normal destruction into health that will indirectly solve the pensions issues.

BermudaRhombus · 20/07/2026 17:08

CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 16:59

The new prime minister also left the door open to reintroducing a 50p top rate of income tax on the highest earners, despite the move being explicitly ruled out in Labour’s last election manifesto.

Go on Burnham, do it - swing left son.

No one has won an election from the left for over 50 years. Burnham will swing left and put Labour back into the electoral wilderness. His immediate successor will probably stay left because Labour never learn from history. Eventually, after two or three GE losses, they’ll regain some sanity and move back to the right. I foresee another chance for them in then 2040s.

Partickthistle · 20/07/2026 17:08

Why should he? Give him a chance, he hasn't even chosen his government yet. And did any of the Tory idiots?

Binnyforthewin · 20/07/2026 17:09

CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 16:52

Very true.

Rayner, FGS…

Is there any question, where the best/correct answer is Angela Rayner?

Who should give up their seat for the next years incoming leader of the Labour Party?

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:10

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 17:07

Embracing it doesn't mean they set the scene.

What is the 'it' you think Labour supporters online set up and what does set up mean in that context specifically? Using standard definitions of the term.

I’d say the it is the hounding the pp referred to in their post. To which I responded (and could have been left rather than more scrutiny than the new PM’s speech).

Which some now would like to stop as it’s impacting their party. But many would have contributed to at the time.

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 17:13

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:10

I’d say the it is the hounding the pp referred to in their post. To which I responded (and could have been left rather than more scrutiny than the new PM’s speech).

Which some now would like to stop as it’s impacting their party. But many would have contributed to at the time.

Sorry which pp? I've not seen any post where someone attempts to explain how Labour set the scene other than all your attempts, would you mind quoting the bit you're thinking of? I'm referring specifically to scene setting, nothing else.

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:14

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 17:13

Sorry which pp? I've not seen any post where someone attempts to explain how Labour set the scene other than all your attempts, would you mind quoting the bit you're thinking of? I'm referring specifically to scene setting, nothing else.

Scroll back and see - hounding

Labourites did it and now don’t like it.

CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 17:16

BermudaRhombus · 20/07/2026 17:08

No one has won an election from the left for over 50 years. Burnham will swing left and put Labour back into the electoral wilderness. His immediate successor will probably stay left because Labour never learn from history. Eventually, after two or three GE losses, they’ll regain some sanity and move back to the right. I foresee another chance for them in then 2040s.

Well, I would be quite content if I can avoid another Labour government, in my lifetime.

I am keen that Burnham goes hard left asap, so that we can consign this failed socialist experiment to ashes/dust.

Socialism should be experienced by every generation, once - to act as a vaccination against socialism.

CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 17:17

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:14

Scroll back and see - hounding

Labourites did it and now don’t like it.

They absolutely hate it.

That awful combination of being able to dish it out, but not take it.

LuckyHazelFox · 20/07/2026 17:21

CagneyLacey · 20/07/2026 17:17

They absolutely hate it.

That awful combination of being able to dish it out, but not take it.

Yep.

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 17:22

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:14

Scroll back and see - hounding

Labourites did it and now don’t like it.

Afraid I still don't see who you mean, as the only posts I've seen attempt a definition are from you in response to me. If such a person were hounding you as opposed to simply replying, it should be easy for you to find their posts.

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:26

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 17:22

Afraid I still don't see who you mean, as the only posts I've seen attempt a definition are from you in response to me. If such a person were hounding you as opposed to simply replying, it should be easy for you to find their posts.

You do realise I responded to someone else before you launched in. Look for that post. And no I don’t mean they were hounding me.

There’s a new PM, speech, cabinet and you’re focusing on this and still not getting it right.

Hounding is the word they used that should stop wrt Labour. As Labourites enjoyed doing the same it’s hypocritical to now want it to stop.

BrownBookshelf · 20/07/2026 17:29

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:26

You do realise I responded to someone else before you launched in. Look for that post. And no I don’t mean they were hounding me.

There’s a new PM, speech, cabinet and you’re focusing on this and still not getting it right.

Hounding is the word they used that should stop wrt Labour. As Labourites enjoyed doing the same it’s hypocritical to now want it to stop.

You and I are focusing equally on your scene setting claim. Or alternatively, you've done it more if you were discussing this with someone else that I've missed. If having a new PM today is a reason for me not to focus on your claim, it's also a reason for you not to focus on it now and indeed not to have made that error in the first place.

Edit- perhaps @CagneyLacey or @LuckyHazelFox might shed some light, given their approving responses to you? I'm very ready to see a specific justification for the 'set out' claim from anyone.

LuckyHazelFox · 20/07/2026 17:29

Milliband and Mahmood walking into no 10

Swipe left for the next trending thread