Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Birthday bill split

1000 replies

KnickerlessFatWoman · 18/07/2026 12:55

Last weekend was my mother’s birthday, so we - that’s me, my parents, sister and BIL and their 12 year-old son - went for Sunday lunch. Unfortunately the food wasn’t great, and they ended up taking my main off the bill.

My dad is someone who always wants to treat everyone, so my sister and I decided this time it was our turn and we were going to treat him and our mum instead. When the bill came, BIL asked if we could split it over two cards, but they said they could only take one payment. He paid and I said I’d transfer my share. For the sake of keeping the maths simple on this thread, let’s say the bill was £210, or £35 per head.

Both BIL and sister are crap at responding to messages, so it took me until midweek to get the bank details. I sent over £70 to cover me and one of my parents.

I heard nothing in response, but I was chatting to my mum earlier and she said “Oh, by the way, Katie said you got the money wrong - it was £210 and you only sent £70”. I said no, that was right - my meal and one other. She said, “Ohhh… I think she thought you were splitting it”. I laughed and said, “No, we said we’d treat you and Dad. I didn’t say I’d pay for three meals!”

I don’t really know why my sister couldn’t just have messaged me instead of talking to our mother about it, but that’s not really the issue. Surely she and BIL don’t expect me to pay half the bill? By treating our parents, I meant exactly that - not that I’d pay for them both while my sister just paid for her own family (which is what this amounts to). There are three of them and one of me. If I pay half the bill, sister and BIL have only covered themselves and their child - there’s no “treating” anyone at all.

AIBU for thinking £70 was my share and paying just that?

OP posts:
Melograno · 18/07/2026 18:03

KnickerlessFatWoman · 18/07/2026 14:05

Why are you talking about my sister “needing to pay for four meals” as if that’s a huge imposition, when she, her husband and her child ate three of those meals? Why would anyone be shocked at having to pay for their own food?

And if it’s such a trauma to pay for one meal more than you ate, why aren’t you worrying about me paying for TWO more? On my one income versus their two?

All CFers are always like this though
My Bil though it was " fair" to split the bill when it was just DH and I vs him, SIL and 4 DC
His reasoning was " but we have 4 DC to bring up, its hard"
Indeed !

He told the DC to have what they liked and smirked ,thinking we were splitting
I paid for DH and I on the way back from the loo and he had to pay for everything they ordered.
This was apparently very selfish 😂

Sacmagique75 · 18/07/2026 18:09

It probable boils down to the fact that BIL enjoys getting his free meal from your dad, and by virtue of you offering to treat your parents, he’s had to put his hand in his pocket and pay for both himself and his son instead of the usual freebie

QuickPinkFox · 18/07/2026 18:14

BunnyLake · 18/07/2026 15:33

I wouldn’t expect my single sibling to subsidise my own family. It’s akin to the single person supplement on holiday. A penalty for going there solo.

This

GeorgeMichaelsCat · 18/07/2026 18:22

EarringsandLipstick · 18/07/2026 15:21

The level of misreading, even by MN standards, is insane 🤦🏻‍♀️

OP used £35 as an example, to make the Maths work evenly. It wasn’t necessarily the cost of each person’s meal.

Insane?😂It was a misread. Dear me, if you are bothered so much by a simple mistake, you need to get a life!

hyggetyggedotorg · 18/07/2026 18:25

YANBU. When our children were little, we used to split the bill per adult. I have 3 DCs, one sibling has 2 and the other two siblings each have one child.

Now that all the DCs are grown up (youngest is 16) we just split it per head. If we were treating someone, or a couple, we would pay their share between us.

Which is what you’ve doing.

aberamagold · 18/07/2026 18:25

Your sister was very unreasonable to involve your mother. Not unreasonable for her to mistakenly think you'd (generously) offered to pay half, but a crazy fucker to chase you for the money.
If you had been with a partner and two kids, and they were a couple with three kids, it could be argued it would be pettiness not to split the bill equally, but as there are three of them and only one of you, YANBU.

Swonderful · 18/07/2026 18:26

KnickerlessFatWoman · 18/07/2026 13:06

It was only my main that was taken off; I still had my other courses and my share of the wine to pay. I didn’t bother quibbling about that as BIL wasn’t drinking, so if we’d been paying exact shares, his would have been less anyway.

Did their 12 year old have a share of the wine too?

XiCi · 18/07/2026 18:31

canklesmctacotits · 18/07/2026 13:28

You said your dad always treats people - ie pays 100% - but that your sister and you agreed that this time you would split the bill between you - ie you both pay 100% of the bill.

You didn’t say that you would pay for one parent each in addition to your own meals. That’s a huge gap in misunderstanding and miscommunication.

“Split the bill” means divide the whole thing by the number of people paying. “Treat our parents between us” means each paying for one parent.

And no, you won’t have paid for both parents and she none. You would have paid for yourself, one parent and someone else.

That’s what “splitting the bill” means. If you don’t want to do that, use different (correct!) words.

Edited

Exactly this. You agreed to split the bill which is 50/50. When you explained what you had agreed beforehand I thought, this is simple, the bill should be 50/50. I was then a bit confused when you proceeded to say what you had paid. Its therefore no surprise to me that your sister is confused. I think you should pay what you agreed and be more clear in future what youre willing to pay

oviraptor21 · 18/07/2026 18:39

Not sure why there is all this drama.

OP and sister did not say they were going to "split the bill".
OP and sister agreed that they were going to "treat the parents".
Sister cannot treat the parents if she only pays for her own family and pays nothing for the parents.
If the bill is split then OP pays £70 for her parents and sister pays nothing. Grossly unfair.

OP - stand your ground. Don't pay a penny more.

WimbyAce · 18/07/2026 18:44

I'm with you OP, would be crazy for you to pay half when there are 3 of them and 1 of you!

BunnyLake · 18/07/2026 18:49

XiCi · 18/07/2026 18:31

Exactly this. You agreed to split the bill which is 50/50. When you explained what you had agreed beforehand I thought, this is simple, the bill should be 50/50. I was then a bit confused when you proceeded to say what you had paid. Its therefore no surprise to me that your sister is confused. I think you should pay what you agreed and be more clear in future what youre willing to pay

She said they were going to treat the parents, she didn’t say they were going to split the bill. One sister was going to cover one parent and the other sister was covering the other parent.

MrsElijahMikaelson1 · 18/07/2026 18:55

lifeturnsonadime · 18/07/2026 13:45

that's what I would do if I'd agreed with my sister that the two of us would treat our parents to a meal for the family.

That's , in fact, precisely what our family do do.

We don't quibble over who gets a fairer deal.

Fair play, but if you were the single sister who would consistently get the poorer deal how would that feel? It’s always easy to be generous with someone else’s money.

in this situation, OPs meal was actually free anyway. The deal was to treat the parents between the two of them-ie a parent each. At no point was it suggested that the OP pick up the tab for both parents and a portion of her sisters family. The sister would therefore not be treating her parents would she?

Lifevans · 18/07/2026 18:56

Your sister is a CF and involving your poor mother is so low class.

TheOnlyLivingBoyInNewCross · 18/07/2026 19:01

XiCi · 18/07/2026 18:31

Exactly this. You agreed to split the bill which is 50/50. When you explained what you had agreed beforehand I thought, this is simple, the bill should be 50/50. I was then a bit confused when you proceeded to say what you had paid. Its therefore no surprise to me that your sister is confused. I think you should pay what you agreed and be more clear in future what youre willing to pay

Please quote the part from the OP which states that the OP and her sister ‘agreed to split the bill which is 50/50’.

Bellyblueboy · 18/07/2026 19:17

I think a lot of people arguing OP should pay half have never been the long term single member of a family.

it is so much more expensive - I am sure OP forks out a lot on birthday and Christmas presents - holidays are more expensive - hosting is much more expensive (much more additional people).

Rolling your eyes and saying she is being petty and that it all evens out is nonsense.

superspideysense · 18/07/2026 19:17

yanbu at all. They’re being silly to expect you to pay for them as well. Each party pays for themselves plus 1 parent.

disturbia · 18/07/2026 19:21

KnickerlessFatWoman · 18/07/2026 13:03

Where do you get that I thought my parents were paying for themselves? I said, the plan was to treat our parents.

The bill was £35pp. I paid £70 - my share and one parent’s. The rest of the bill was my sister’s share and one parent’s (another £70) and then my BIL and nephew’s shares (the final £70).

You are right OP your sister needs a maths lesson

ImpatientlyWaitingForSummer · 18/07/2026 19:27

I suppose it just depends on your interpretation of the original conversation you’d had about treating your parents, but if it were me I would have assumed that we would be paying half of the entirety of the bill each. Not saying you’re wrong, just that people might interpret it differently. I’d have interpreted it the same as your sister

Bellyblueboy · 18/07/2026 19:31

ImpatientlyWaitingForSummer · 18/07/2026 19:27

I suppose it just depends on your interpretation of the original conversation you’d had about treating your parents, but if it were me I would have assumed that we would be paying half of the entirety of the bill each. Not saying you’re wrong, just that people might interpret it differently. I’d have interpreted it the same as your sister

That’s interesting. So if your family is three people and your sister is single you would be comfortable with her paying 50% of the bill?

I could understand it if your sister also had a partner at the meal, but I would never expect to free laid like that.

would it not cross your mind that that is unfair? That your husband hasn’t contributed anything and that you also have a child?

burnoutbabe · 18/07/2026 19:44

The sister though may have been thinking -yes I have a budget if £105 for mums present. Sister suggested we pay for the meal so yes, that’s me soeted

if told actually you’ll be paying £140, she may have said “actually dad can pay as Normal, let’s go 50/50 on this £210 painting”!

not saying it’s worth doing for £30 but amounts may be quite different between what she budgeted (50% of whole) and what she had to pay 2/3 of whole)

telling mum after of the misunderstanding was a dick move though.

zephyr148 · 18/07/2026 19:58

Surely as it was a gesture of kindness from both you and your DSis to treat your parents, £70 to £105 wouldn’t make much of a difference? Presumably your nephew, like your BiL, also wasn’t drinking! So overall subsidising you.

ImpatientlyWaitingForSummer · 18/07/2026 20:06

Bellyblueboy · 18/07/2026 19:31

That’s interesting. So if your family is three people and your sister is single you would be comfortable with her paying 50% of the bill?

I could understand it if your sister also had a partner at the meal, but I would never expect to free laid like that.

would it not cross your mind that that is unfair? That your husband hasn’t contributed anything and that you also have a child?

Before my children were born I would go to dinner with my siblings, who did have children, and contribute equally towards the bill despite the fact that the cost of their “share” would’ve been substantially more than mine. Equally they wouldn’t have considered that I didn’t have children present and should really have been paying considerably less. It depends on what the “norm” is and in my family it was that. Hence what I said about OP doing nothing wrong by not paying a 50/50 split

Bellyblueboy · 18/07/2026 20:19

ImpatientlyWaitingForSummer · 18/07/2026 20:06

Before my children were born I would go to dinner with my siblings, who did have children, and contribute equally towards the bill despite the fact that the cost of their “share” would’ve been substantially more than mine. Equally they wouldn’t have considered that I didn’t have children present and should really have been paying considerably less. It depends on what the “norm” is and in my family it was that. Hence what I said about OP doing nothing wrong by not paying a 50/50 split

I am the single one on my family - my sister has three children. While I have offered at times to pay half my sister and brother in law always point out how unfair that is. There are five of them and just one of me.

That is surprising that is never occurred to your siblings that they were in couples, and had brought children along but thought you could pay the same as a family of four people!

Of you are out with friend do they expect single people pay the same as a couple?

backformoreofthesame · 18/07/2026 20:31

zephyr148 · 18/07/2026 19:58

Surely as it was a gesture of kindness from both you and your DSis to treat your parents, £70 to £105 wouldn’t make much of a difference? Presumably your nephew, like your BiL, also wasn’t drinking! So overall subsidising you.

Bring back the laugh emoji

ImpatientlyWaitingForSummer · 18/07/2026 20:33

Bellyblueboy · 18/07/2026 20:19

I am the single one on my family - my sister has three children. While I have offered at times to pay half my sister and brother in law always point out how unfair that is. There are five of them and just one of me.

That is surprising that is never occurred to your siblings that they were in couples, and had brought children along but thought you could pay the same as a family of four people!

Of you are out with friend do they expect single people pay the same as a couple?

It’s quite interesting actually now I think about it, because I was always the higher earner of the siblings (and at times the only earner), so my default was to always try and ease their financial burden, however now with children of my own I would always insist that my partner and I pay the entirety ours and our children’s bill. I can’t think of a time when we’ve been out with both couples and single people but yes I’d like to think I’d ensure it was fair for them. So yes upon reflection I see it more from the other perspective now

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread