Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel uneasy about my partner's inheritance plan?

660 replies

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:02

My partner and I are planning on moving in together. We will each sell our separate properties and buy one together 50/50. He is a widow with 2 DC in their mid twenties. I don't have children.

We are starting to talk about how we would set up finances, and one issue that has come up is that if he dies first he wants his half of the house to pass to his children in trust, whilst I remain able to live in the property until I sell or die. They would then inherit their Dad's half when I die, or get their half if I sell. My half is for me to decide who inherits. FWIW, I would leave my half of the house to him.

This doesn't sit well with me. If he dies first, then half of my home is owned by others. I get on well with them, but I have no idea if they would want to maintain a relationship with me after their Dad's death.

Part of me completely understands why he wants to leave his children his share, but it leaves me in a really tricky position. I really don't like the idea of this at all. AIBU? What have others done in this position? I can't be the first person to have this problem!

OP posts:
godmum56 · 18/07/2026 21:26

pikkumyy77 · 18/07/2026 19:19

Also: everyone smugly informing OP that she must not have understood what the proposal is or what the trust would say or what the limitations on the trustees would be are just incredibly rude and presumptuous. You have no idea what the proposal is or how the DP has worded it or plans to try to formalize it. People do shitty things all the time around real estate and inheritance. Stop assuming good faith on the DP’s part and stupidity/ignorance on the OP’s part.

oh absolutely this

SpaceRaccoon · 18/07/2026 21:45

prh47bridge · 18/07/2026 21:22

I'm not sure how she will be in a poor situation. She will still own 50% of the house and she will be able to continue living in it for as long as she wants or, if she prefers, she can sell up and use the proceeds to move elsewhere. She will have to keep the property in good order. Unless this is an extremely unusual life interest trust, that is all that will be required of her.

At the moment she has a property she owns 100%.

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:17

pikkumyy77 · 18/07/2026 11:40

Ok but the point is that she is thinking about what choices she will have under different ownership rules. She doesn’t have to accept this ridiculous will and trust situation. And she shouldn’t! Because it ties her hands just when she might want more freedom. And all for the benefit of his children. She could soend 39 years taking care of him, wiping his ass, and keeping him from a care home and the minute he dies she becomes his children’s pensioner? Her interests take a ack seat to theirs? Ridiculous!

I agree, I wouldn't do it either. What if her own needs change and she wants to move to a more suitable home? If she can't afford that with the value of half a house, she's stuck. I hope they get proper legal advice and find a work around. Otherwise I wouldn't do it. I do understand him wanting to protect his children though. That would be my priority too.

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:19

Obanotters · 18/07/2026 12:32

I am not sure why you keep talking about trusts. There is no need for a trust and no suggestion there will be one. Of course you can own a property and not maintain it. Lots of people do. It could simply be written into the will that OP can continue to live in the house without releasing her partners share of the equity until her death or sale of the property on the condition that she maintains the property at her expense. If OP doesn’t want to do that she has the option at that point to sell the property and give her partners children their inheritance.

At who's expense it is should be made very clear in the will. I wouldn't do this unless the house is suitable for someone old and frail to start with. I also wouldn't want my options limited by only having access to half the value of a house if life changes and I need to move.

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:20

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:19

At who's expense it is should be made very clear in the will. I wouldn't do this unless the house is suitable for someone old and frail to start with. I also wouldn't want my options limited by only having access to half the value of a house if life changes and I need to move.

But that's all she has now - half the value. 🤷‍♀️

SpaceRaccoon · 18/07/2026 22:21

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:20

But that's all she has now - half the value. 🤷‍♀️

No she owns her own house just now 100%.

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:22

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:20

But that's all she has now - half the value. 🤷‍♀️

She currently has a home that is 100% hers. She plans to sell it to go in with the man who will leave her 50%. She'd be worse off.

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:24

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:22

She currently has a home that is 100% hers. She plans to sell it to go in with the man who will leave her 50%. She'd be worse off.

Yes but they are going in jointly. She's not putting up 100% of the money for the new house ? Is she ? Have I missed that part?

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:27

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:22

She currently has a home that is 100% hers. She plans to sell it to go in with the man who will leave her 50%. She'd be worse off.

Let's say her current home is worth 250k . She then matches this with his 250k so they get a much nicer property. At the end of the day she still has her 250k plus any profit. 🤷‍♀️

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:29

prh47bridge · 18/07/2026 21:22

I'm not sure how she will be in a poor situation. She will still own 50% of the house and she will be able to continue living in it for as long as she wants or, if she prefers, she can sell up and use the proceeds to move elsewhere. She will have to keep the property in good order. Unless this is an extremely unusual life interest trust, that is all that will be required of her.

People don't seem to understand that 50% of a 500k property is the same value as 100 % of a 250k one. 🤷‍♀️

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:29

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:27

Let's say her current home is worth 250k . She then matches this with his 250k so they get a much nicer property. At the end of the day she still has her 250k plus any profit. 🤷‍♀️

Meanwhile house prices probably increase. When she comes to sell, let's say she wants to downsize to a more manageable property for age, she will have 50% the value of a full house. That may no longer be enough to buy a full house without a mortgage (which she won't get at that age) unless she's really seriously downsizing to something likely to be much less. Her options will be more limited. If she had 100% of the house value, she'd have far more options.

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:32

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:29

Meanwhile house prices probably increase. When she comes to sell, let's say she wants to downsize to a more manageable property for age, she will have 50% the value of a full house. That may no longer be enough to buy a full house without a mortgage (which she won't get at that age) unless she's really seriously downsizing to something likely to be much less. Her options will be more limited. If she had 100% of the house value, she'd have far more options.

She will have the same monetary value - how can you not see this ?

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:32

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:29

People don't seem to understand that 50% of a 500k property is the same value as 100 % of a 250k one. 🤷‍♀️

Who says they are buying a home twice the value of the one they have now each? If I'm considering my next move I'd rather than 500K to play with than 250K.

Generally speaking, if I were to sell my own home and move, I'd be moving sideways because the housing market has shifted. I need 100% out of my property to remain mortgage free. If I only have 50%, I'll need a mortgage for half the house. Obviously this will significantly affect my fiances or options for housing. It would be a serious downgrade in home and area.

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:33

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:32

She will have the same monetary value - how can you not see this ?

Because I own a home and I've looked at what is needed to downsize. It's not as simple as you seem to think. Heard of inflation?

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:37

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:33

Because I own a home and I've looked at what is needed to downsize. It's not as simple as you seem to think. Heard of inflation?

Edited

Ok answer these questions / what is 50% in pounds of a 500k house? What is 100% of a 250k house ? The answer is it is the same ! 250k . How is she losing money ?

Coconutter24 · 18/07/2026 22:38

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:31

I don’t want the DC contributing financially as that would give them a say. It all feels very awkward to me.

I’ll happily write my will to leave them his and my share (I don’t have any family at all).

I will see a solicitor, but I suspect the answer is don’t buy a place together.

Could you either buy them out (if he dies first) or sell the house then you take your half his kids take theirs and you buy somewhere else

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:39

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:32

Who says they are buying a home twice the value of the one they have now each? If I'm considering my next move I'd rather than 500K to play with than 250K.

Generally speaking, if I were to sell my own home and move, I'd be moving sideways because the housing market has shifted. I need 100% out of my property to remain mortgage free. If I only have 50%, I'll need a mortgage for half the house. Obviously this will significantly affect my fiances or options for housing. It would be a serious downgrade in home and area.

Irrelevant. I'm just using figures to illustrate. Let's say she puts 125 k in the bank and she puts 125K towards the new house and he does the same. They buy a 250k house . Where is she losing money?

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:41

Coconutter24 · 18/07/2026 22:38

Could you either buy them out (if he dies first) or sell the house then you take your half his kids take theirs and you buy somewhere else

This is an option they can choose to do at the will writing stage. When I die the house is to be sold ... easy.

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:41

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:37

Ok answer these questions / what is 50% in pounds of a 500k house? What is 100% of a 250k house ? The answer is it is the same ! 250k . How is she losing money ?

The housing market isn't static like that. Neither is the value of money. There's a reason for the indexing of things. 250K now isn't going to be worth the same in ten or twenty years. It also won't have as much buying power.

Get yourself mortgage free then look at what would happen if you wanted to move house. You'll find it's not quite as simple and you're unlikely to get another house for half the price of the one you have now, even if it's much smaller.

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:42

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:39

Irrelevant. I'm just using figures to illustrate. Let's say she puts 125 k in the bank and she puts 125K towards the new house and he does the same. They buy a 250k house . Where is she losing money?

Do you really think 125K is going to be worth the same in ten or twenty years?

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:43

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:42

Do you really think 125K is going to be worth the same in ten or twenty years?

Of course not it will be worth more and she will get her money back plus her part of the increase in value it has made.

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:44

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:43

Of course not it will be worth more and she will get her money back plus her part of the increase in value it has made.

Every other house on the market will also increase, not necessarily proportionately. I'm sure you'll figure it out one day. Do you own a home?

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:45

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:41

The housing market isn't static like that. Neither is the value of money. There's a reason for the indexing of things. 250K now isn't going to be worth the same in ten or twenty years. It also won't have as much buying power.

Get yourself mortgage free then look at what would happen if you wanted to move house. You'll find it's not quite as simple and you're unlikely to get another house for half the price of the one you have now, even if it's much smaller.

You don't seem to understand the basic point here. If she stays in her imaginary 250k house then the same will apply.

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:46

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:44

Every other house on the market will also increase, not necessarily proportionately. I'm sure you'll figure it out one day. Do you own a home?

So tell me how do you propose she increases the value of her imaginary 250k house to cope with the future when she may want to downsize ?

thereisnomeaning · 18/07/2026 22:49

mommaham · 18/07/2026 22:46

So tell me how do you propose she increases the value of her imaginary 250k house to cope with the future when she may want to downsize ?

She needs full ownership of a home to make sure she has all the options. She might not be able to stay in the home she gets with her partner. Old age can change what kind of house you can physically cope with. Life is unpredictable and you need to be able to move with it if necessary.

I would suggest that if she wants to move in with her partner, she keeps her current home 100%, rents it out and it's always there for her. Her partner can buy the home they live in 100% and leave it 100% to his daughters. Then they are both in the clear.

Swipe left for the next trending thread