Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to ask whether the death penalty should apply for certain crimes in the UK?

663 replies

PenelopeJoanSterling · 13/07/2026 23:04

Because the topics got mixed up on my previous thread i thought id ask here, for certain types of crime in the uk, would you be either for or against the death penalty for certain crimes and why ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
KateSixer · 13/07/2026 23:45

PointySlippers · 13/07/2026 23:43

I would say they are Chrisian in name but pagan by values.

Well OK but that's a debate about the meaning and values of Christanity then not the DP.

"No one expects the Spanish Inquisition" remember that?!

PointySlippers · 13/07/2026 23:45

GoneWithTHeWindJammers · 13/07/2026 23:40

What about the effect on those involved in an execution? The prison governor, who must be present, the warders who have to accompany the condemned from the condemned cell to the execution cell. The lawyers who have unsuccessfully tried to get their client a stay of execution or a reprieve. The children of the condemned who thought innocent now have to live with the shame that their parent was executed. If you support the death penalty, have a look at what happened to Ruth Ellis's son. Would you as a juror, convict in a murder case, knowing that a guilty verdict might lead to a death sentence?

Excellent points.

lazymaw · 13/07/2026 23:46

randomchap · 13/07/2026 23:32

Miscarriages of justice? Just unlucky for the innocent person killed by the state?

well if our judicial system is that flawed, we need an overhaul and we all have a big problem. I’d like to think things have improved since the early 20th century and where there is dna, confession/multiple witnesses etc and it used sparingly in the most shocking cases (places like india and japan do this, not that they are beacons of justice but my point is in how it’s applied), i see no issue. There needs to be a high threshold met but I would gladly pull the trigger for recent scumbags: verley, couzens, letby,

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 13/07/2026 23:46

IFancyABaconSarnie · 13/07/2026 23:43

Really. I disagree!
Preston Davey. The death penalty for his abusers would absolutely be justifiable! Waste of oxygen the pair of them!

"How DARE THEY murder that baby!!!!""

"The State should murder 2x someone else's baby! That's absolutely justifiable!!!!!"

Mindless.

Ladamesansmerci · 13/07/2026 23:47

I don't trust the government with it, and for that reason I'm against the death penalty.

That being said, I absolutely would not give a flying fuck about the loss of people like Preston Davey's killer and mass shooters, where there is absolutely 0 doubt what's happened.

There are some people who absolutely cannot be rehabilitated. And for me, it's honestly about what someone deserves, rather than it being a deterrent (which we know it isn't). I work in mental health services, and see the effects of things like childhood sexual abuse time and time again. It feels like there is barely any justice for victims sometimes.

Regardless, I can't endorse state sanctioned murder. There are cases we are absolutely sure (such as witnessed shootings), but the government would absolutely abuse it, and I also don't want innocent people killed (because if we allowed it for some cases even with 100% proof, it's a slippery slope to allowing it for others). So I'm against the death penalty, but whilst also holding the opinion some people are absolutely a waste of oxygen and shouldn't be on our planet.

ALovelyPinkUnicorn · 13/07/2026 23:48

iwasboredinbed · 13/07/2026 23:44

I think when people invoke such tragedies as this, it’s done in bad faith. You know that nobody will sit here and say “well he deserves another chance”, thus essentially shutting down the argument.

But for every Southport there’s a Letby, who has serious questions around her guilt. There are miscarriages of justice everyday and humans are fallible. That alone is enough to convince anyone that the death penalty is wrong. If new evidence emerges after the death, then what? Someone else’s life has been taken unlawfully.

Never mind the logistics and legal issues involved.

so you support Axel Rudakubana then? Poor chap should have been told his behaviour wasn’t the best… but alls ok. He can do whatever he wants with no impunity!!

iwasboredinbed · 13/07/2026 23:48

ALovelyPinkUnicorn · 13/07/2026 23:48

so you support Axel Rudakubana then? Poor chap should have been told his behaviour wasn’t the best… but alls ok. He can do whatever he wants with no impunity!!

Sorry, where did I say that?

I didn’t. I said that people invoke these tragedies in support of the death penalty in bad faith, in order to shut down the argument.

PointySlippers · 13/07/2026 23:49

KateSixer · 13/07/2026 23:45

Well OK but that's a debate about the meaning and values of Christanity then not the DP.

"No one expects the Spanish Inquisition" remember that?!

It isn't, really.
"Thou shalt not kill" is words of one syllable (in English). And Calvary a pretty clear path.
People are tempted to twist things and churches evolve, splinter, etc. People are imperfect.
But this is the central truth.
Britain is largely a Christian heritage country and the King is the head of the Anglican church.
A meaningful update to that would be eschewing the death penalty.

TheCurious0range · 13/07/2026 23:51

@PenelopeJoanSterling you still haven't addressed my points on recidivism and longer term cultural impact. Why is that?

KateSixer · 13/07/2026 23:52

But my point was that in say Victorian times when they were simultaneously abolishing the slave trade and executing people for a variety of offences the people regarded themselves as very Christian (and they had the same Commandments).

Nowdontmakeamess · 13/07/2026 23:52

I think anyone who followed the Preston Davey trial would gladly see Jamie Varley hang - after a few decades suffering in prison first. He tortured and raped a baby to death. He was the only person in the house with Preston when the abuse and murder took place, there was also video & DNA evidence so zero chance of miscarriage of justice.

iwasboredinbed · 13/07/2026 23:53

TheCurious0range · 13/07/2026 23:51

@PenelopeJoanSterling you still haven't addressed my points on recidivism and longer term cultural impact. Why is that?

She doesn’t know what it means!

ShetlandishMum · 13/07/2026 23:54

For a case like Lucy Letby's? Or? Most likely yes? And that case is really iffy.

No thank you.

iwasboredinbed · 13/07/2026 23:54

Nowdontmakeamess · 13/07/2026 23:52

I think anyone who followed the Preston Davey trial would gladly see Jamie Varley hang - after a few decades suffering in prison first. He tortured and raped a baby to death. He was the only person in the house with Preston when the abuse and murder took place, there was also video & DNA evidence so zero chance of miscarriage of justice.

I wouldn’t. It would give him multiple more years in the limelight in court. I’d rather he was just locked up and forgotten about, while the money that would be spent on his appeals is spent on improving the social care system.

Elliania · 13/07/2026 23:55

No. Because it's not enough of a deterrent, it's wrong to give the Government this kind of power and there is absolutely no way to prevent any innocent people being put to death. Even 1 would be too many. There are absolutely some people who commit heinous crimes & don't need to be here but then they should just be locked away and let the world forget about them.

youvemadeyourpoint · 13/07/2026 23:56

PenelopeJoanSterling · 13/07/2026 23:40

but how can a god stand by and let his flock get destroyed by criminals ?

He doesn’t interfere in free will.

GoneWithTHeWindJammers · 13/07/2026 23:57

KateSixer · 13/07/2026 23:52

But my point was that in say Victorian times when they were simultaneously abolishing the slave trade and executing people for a variety of offences the people regarded themselves as very Christian (and they had the same Commandments).

There were plenty of people who wanted to abolish the death penalty in Victorian Britain. Charles Dickens campaigned to end public hangings. At the start of the Victorian period, there were 200 capital offences, by the end just 5. The Victorians were trying to rid themselves of the death penalty.

IFancyABaconSarnie · 13/07/2026 23:57

iwasboredinbed · 13/07/2026 23:54

I wouldn’t. It would give him multiple more years in the limelight in court. I’d rather he was just locked up and forgotten about, while the money that would be spent on his appeals is spent on improving the social care system.

Bring back hanging for those sick bastards. Why should the tax payer pay for them to languish in prison! They’re no good to society and never will be!

youvemadeyourpoint · 13/07/2026 23:58

PenelopeJoanSterling · 13/07/2026 23:40

but how can a god stand by and let his flock get destroyed by criminals ?

He doesn’t interfere with free will.

PointySlippers · 13/07/2026 23:58

KateSixer · 13/07/2026 23:52

But my point was that in say Victorian times when they were simultaneously abolishing the slave trade and executing people for a variety of offences the people regarded themselves as very Christian (and they had the same Commandments).

Read up on the history of the Black church and also on Christianity among abolitionists?

Christ's own disciples behaved terribly some of the time. Calling oneself a Christian does not mean becoming perfect. It means we have an example of something in, and of, but also other than our fallen world's confusions and our often bad decisions. And the most loving Friend to help us do better if we choose to.

GerbilontheMike · 13/07/2026 23:58

No, because it’s not a deterrent, the police and courts sometimes get it wrong, and I think it sends the wrong message. Society doesn’t get less violent by adding in more state sanctioned violence.

Just this week, Ruth Ellis was given a conditional pardon, and there are many other examples of miscarriages of justice.

Don’t get me wrong, I feel the same anger as everyone when I read stories of child murderers and rapists, and the lowest of the low, but my anger and revulsion shouldn’t be a sound basis for the administration of justice.

Frequency · 14/07/2026 00:00

IFancyABaconSarnie · 13/07/2026 23:57

Bring back hanging for those sick bastards. Why should the tax payer pay for them to languish in prison! They’re no good to society and never will be!

The death penalty costs more than life in prison, unless you plan on also doing away with appeals, defence lawyers, forensics done on behalf of the defence... all things that have been used to overturn wrongful convictions in the past.

PointySlippers · 14/07/2026 00:00

François Mitterand's brilliant work towards abolition of the death penalty in France is worth looking at.

PenelopeJoanSterling · 14/07/2026 00:00

iwasboredinbed · 13/07/2026 23:53

She doesn’t know what it means!

rude but true, ill need to google it

OP posts:
EverythingAIIAtOnce · 14/07/2026 00:03

PenelopeJoanSterling · 13/07/2026 23:40

but how can a god stand by and let his flock get destroyed by criminals ?

You could ask that about anything that kills his flock. Disease, famine, pestilence, heatwaves, flood, war...the list is endless yet god stands by. No excuse for the death penalty.