Polanski is a buffoon

[Bertiebiscuit]

How anyone can take the Green party leader Zac Polanski seriously is completely beyond me. He has zero grasp of economics, beyond conning women out of ££££s by pretending he could hypnotise them to increase their bust measurements. He is the worst representative of gay men who worship the men pretending to be women, with no regard for womens and girls' right to privacy, dignity and safety. The man is a 24 carat buffoon.

It's not about that though, you et al. Are putting women off voting for all the parties that care more for equality than Reform ever will. Your actions are a danger to democracy but I'm not convinced you are not well aware of that.

Can you need to learn to read and stop misquoting people. You still haven't acknowledged that

I haven’t read the full thread. Polanski (not his real name?). He worries me a lot actually. He is very very plausible when he speaks. I watched him on Newsnight the other night. A lot of people could be taken in by him.

@HappyFace2025

Of course that poster knows what a woman is, like everyone else on the planet, even when they’re pretending not to. We even had the appeal to “women’s rights”. And apparently it’s now all my fault that democracy is collapsing. Hey ho, what a busy life I lead!

It’s so lazy, isn’t it? I’ll either spoil my vote, or vote tactically to keep Reform out.

Sorry I replied to you in error and have asked the post to be removed.

I think the ‘he hates women’ thing is just referring to the fact he isn’t anti trans rights. It doesn’t seem to be based on anything else.

I agree with his message too. He’s the only politician who’s campaigning against wealth inequality. Everyone else just wants to preserve the status quo, and we just need to look at the Epstein files to see where having an elite, rich ruling class has got us.

See my post @15.56.

It is a non issue.

You are playing straight into the hands of people who despise women by doing their work for them.

Lining up next to the likes of Trump!

So do explain what a woman is, so we are all clear, (including fans of Polanski).

It is lazy. It’s the hallmark of people who know they have no valid argument against the clearly stated thing you actually think, so they have to try to dismiss you and that’s an easy way to do it.

I wouldn't even rise to it.

I think this is a mistake that the leftist parties have made for years - it is not the duty of the electorate (particularly women, in recent elections) to hold their noses and vote in these parties despite their batshit, unpopular policies. It is their job to persuade people to give their votes via policies that appeal to the electorate.

Polanski, the Lib Dems, the tra faction of Labour have made it very clear that they don't want my vote as a nasty terf. Very well, they don't get it.

If you want them to get more votes, suggest to them they try adopting sane policies that the electorate wants.

It is not a non issue, and it isn’t going to go away just because you disapprove of the women standing up against it.

Dangerous to billionaires, ongoing and increasing wealth inequality and the status quo perhaps.

This.

I’ve seen Labour supporters literally raging here that people won’t vote for them because of this issue and others. My vote belongs to me, no one else.

Speak for yourself. I find her posts interesting.

Also they get angry that anyone dares to suggest that left wing parties need to give up the batshit stuff in order to become electable to a majority of people, or that it was why Trump was elected, for eg.

No surprise.

I really shouldn't be getting sucked back in this batshitery, but really, defining what a woman is a non issue for you?

How can you even dare mentioning the rights of women when you cannot even be arsed to answer what one is?

Would you care to expand on that?

Hear, hear 👏

Just say you’re a Tory/ right winger and be done with it. Don’t use your and my and all of our womanhood as your figleaf

🙄