Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Rachel Reeves lied on her CV was not an “Economist”

1000 replies

Disappointedagain22 · 16/11/2024 11:33

AIBU - it’s OK to lie to get ahead

AINBU - it’s bad RReeves very Publicly lied about her prior work. We are right to feel annoyed by this lie.

saw this headline and am feeling really disappointed. Think Rachel Reeves needs to tell public exactly her job title.
She changed job title from Economist, to “Retail Banking”
An Economist at a Bank, is a clear and specific job, it’s a economic research position. A good experience for her current position.

”Retail Banking” - is not a job title … she could have been doing anything in a branch from Bank Teller, to Branch manager, or working in back office operations putting bank notes in the plastic bags or in HR.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Zonder · 19/11/2024 07:35

FrankieStein403 · 19/11/2024 00:36

  1. Reeves was/is an economist. She has the training and qualifications from two of the UKs top ranked universities including the most prestigious UK economics hothouse.
  2. Being pedantic, your LinkedIn profile is not a CV - it's more of a shop window - as such you big up everything especially in your first decade after uni when your real world achievements haven't yet forked any lightening and in any case are usually claimed by your boss.
  3. She was elected as MP in 2010 at the age of 31 just about a decade after her MSc - she was perfectly entitled to say she was an economist during that prior decade - the spell at HBOS doesn't mean she stopped being an economist - just that the job she was doing may not have needed those skills.

The overlap of RR and Kev Gillett had to be about a year of the three she was at HBOS and given his wider 'operations' role seemed to be closing branches, interactions with complaints staff '3 levels below' would have been cursory.

He says that RR was a manager and that the 3 'senior' managers were signing off each others expenses - not that RR was one of those managers - if they were senior to her what possible role could she have had in this 'scandal' ?

(In any case the signoffs in themselves wouldn't be unusual - the issue being whether a manager was signing off expenses that breached policy or that exceeded their authority. I'd be surprised if anything actually happened to those three beyond some updates to the expenses policy. )

This really is mud slinging in the hope something will stick. It's also clear that OPs thread title is libellous - suggest she gets mn to insert 'alleged'
1.

I really appreciate you posting this. Sadly some people will skim past it and ignore the facts in it in favour of peddling the lies.

BIossomtoes · 19/11/2024 07:39

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 07:35

Even if Reeves did exaggerate her experience as an economist, why would that make her unqualified to be Chancellor?

It wouldn’t. What a storm in a tea cup this is.

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 07:40

A real news story doing the rounds is the start Labour are making to childrens services, where privatised operators are making over £45k profit per child in their care

It will cost billions to put this right and gradually move children away from these crooks and into either not for profit companies or council run services

This. Vulnerable children have been housed in terrible conditions whilst providers have been raking in the cash. But who cares about that when Kev McGill says Reeves lied about going to the dentist.

It is just pathetic. Starmer is right to ignore the whole thing. Unless something new and major is revealed, Reeves is going nowhere.

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 08:03

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 07:35

Even if Reeves did exaggerate her experience as an economist, why would that make her unqualified to be Chancellor?

But why don’t you like Reeves?

What have you detected? What has made you form you opinion of her?

Efacsen · 19/11/2024 08:09

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 08:03

But why don’t you like Reeves?

What have you detected? What has made you form you opinion of her?

Why does it matter?

bombastix · 19/11/2024 08:11

I see the Telegraph is still twisting its knickers on this but all the other broadsheets have got bored.

louddumpernoise · 19/11/2024 08:15

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 07:40

A real news story doing the rounds is the start Labour are making to childrens services, where privatised operators are making over £45k profit per child in their care

It will cost billions to put this right and gradually move children away from these crooks and into either not for profit companies or council run services

This. Vulnerable children have been housed in terrible conditions whilst providers have been raking in the cash. But who cares about that when Kev McGill says Reeves lied about going to the dentist.

It is just pathetic. Starmer is right to ignore the whole thing. Unless something new and major is revealed, Reeves is going nowhere.

Edited

Yes he is and i'll be taking a leaf out of his book too, there are more, far more important issues facing the country and Europe right now.

As for this Kevin character, he lost me when he said Reeves was followed to see if she really went to the Dentist... utter rubbish, she'd have been asked for appointment proof, if excessive & if this wasn't forthcoming, possible disciplinary procedure instigated, following a woman around London?

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 08:17

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 08:03

But why don’t you like Reeves?

What have you detected? What has made you form you opinion of her?

What has whether or not I like her and why got to do with anything? I can not like her, but at the same time not want to see her smeared by the right-wing press and Twitter.

Rachel757677 · 19/11/2024 08:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Ytcsghisn · 19/11/2024 08:45

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Quite. The parrots are so vexed about this coming out, they have non stop been trying to defend it. But now we know.

Ytcsghisn · 19/11/2024 08:47

The British Retail Consortium and a bunch of businesses this morning coming out to say that the budget is a disaster. It will lead to lower than inflation pay growth and job losses.

Thats how good the ‘Economist’ chancellor is. She can call herself a quantum physicist if she wants, but it’s unravelling fast.

Rachel757677 · 19/11/2024 08:51

Ytcsghisn · 19/11/2024 08:47

The British Retail Consortium and a bunch of businesses this morning coming out to say that the budget is a disaster. It will lead to lower than inflation pay growth and job losses.

Thats how good the ‘Economist’ chancellor is. She can call herself a quantum physicist if she wants, but it’s unravelling fast.

Edited

Apparently, by her own admission she was a "very junior Japan analyst".

Oh dear....

louddumpernoise · 19/11/2024 09:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

There is nothing to defend, esp against these sorts of attacks, which are v similar to the Rayner ones, look what happened to them?

i did laugh at your Shambles comment, Cons had 14 years in power, how many Chancellors? how many PMs? how many education secretaries? how many GE's... How much damage done by Truss? ... Instability and Austerity is their legacy.

How long are waiting lists now? how many more in poverty?

I think another poster called people who make these sorts unsubstantiated attacks - STL's

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 09:01

Ytcsghisn · 19/11/2024 08:45

Quite. The parrots are so vexed about this coming out, they have non stop been trying to defend it. But now we know.

Parrots? What is that supposed to mean? Hmm?

pointythings · 19/11/2024 09:02

I almost wish the Tories had won, then we wouldn't be subjected to these endless smears from sore losers. 5 years of this, ffs.

Rachel757677 · 19/11/2024 09:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

EasternStandard · 19/11/2024 09:06

Ytcsghisn · 19/11/2024 08:47

The British Retail Consortium and a bunch of businesses this morning coming out to say that the budget is a disaster. It will lead to lower than inflation pay growth and job losses.

Thats how good the ‘Economist’ chancellor is. She can call herself a quantum physicist if she wants, but it’s unravelling fast.

Edited

This and farmers' union today talking about betrayal

Why they both believed Labour pre GE is probably down to false lines but still surprising

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 09:09

Rachel757677 · 19/11/2024 08:51

Apparently, by her own admission she was a "very junior Japan analyst".

Oh dear....

It really helps if you provide a source for your info. So in 2012 Reeves mentioned on Twitter something about when she was the junior Japan analyst at BOE. So what?

Rachel Reeves lied on her CV was not an “Economist”
EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 09:10

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 08:17

What has whether or not I like her and why got to do with anything? I can not like her, but at the same time not want to see her smeared by the right-wing press and Twitter.

Sure, but what is it you don’t like about her?

I ask because you are clearly perceptive.

Efacsen · 19/11/2024 09:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Did you see LilyMNHQs post last night about not turning this thread into a bunfight?

Same goes for the 'parrots' insult @Ytcsghisn

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 09:13

Let’s keep this thread civil please people!

PandoraSox · 19/11/2024 09:14

EverythingAllatOnceAllTheTime · 19/11/2024 09:10

Sure, but what is it you don’t like about her?

I ask because you are clearly perceptive.

I am taking a leaf out of @Efacsen's book.

Did you see LilyMNHQs post last night about not turning this thread into a bunfight?

Please stop harassing me about why I don't like RR. My personal feelings have nothing to do with the discussion and I owe you no explanation.

EasternStandard · 19/11/2024 09:20

I feel for pensioners and students who got hit early on but lack clout to do much

At least retailers and farmers can do more

And CV problems or not Reeves will face pressure if she's got the growth part wrong. So far it is the case, so will need a turnaround.

Maggiethecat · 19/11/2024 09:22

Victoria Atkins on Breakfast tv casually referring to RR lying about her cv.

Doesn’t surprise me!

He11oKitty · 19/11/2024 09:22

hettie · 16/11/2024 11:57

I cannot believe that on a site primarily aimed at women we are trying to undermine the achievements of the first female chancellor by saying she made the tea!
She worked for the bank of England for 6 years as an economist in the structural economic analysis division, she wrote papers (you can find them if you look).
Makes sense it was daily mail...
Look if by the end of the parliament the economy has gotten worse then fine judge her by her performance but this really is not a good look ...

👏👏👏

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread