Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be absolutely agog at Raquel Welch's appearance

116 replies

kitnkaboodle · 12/01/2017 23:29

... on Piers Morgan. She's 76 ffs, and doesn't actually look too artificial Shock

OP posts:
ImperialBlether · 12/01/2017 23:31

Raquel Welch at her son's wedding. She arrived late, causing a stir. I think her DIL's face says it all.

Grin
To be absolutely agog at Raquel Welch's appearance
DonkeyOaty · 12/01/2017 23:34

Wearing black and with her tits out. Freud would have had a lot to say about that, methinks.

But yes she looks great being tall helps as do good genes

StrangeLookingParasite · 12/01/2017 23:36

Jeez, how desperate for attention would you need to be to do that to your DIL? Sad cow.

kitnkaboodle · 12/01/2017 23:40

... she certainly looks better than Burton Reynolds - on the same programme. Holy cow! Do these Hollywood people not have anyone sensible around them to tell them when they look that bad ..?

OP posts:
kitnkaboodle · 12/01/2017 23:41

Burt, obv ...

OP posts:
toomanypetals · 12/01/2017 23:44

Absolute narcissist to do that on your son's wedding day. Disgraceful woman Sad

Birdsgottafly · 12/01/2017 23:54

Well the marriage lasted two years, I wonder what it was like being her DIL.

It was 27 years ago, so she was 49, still looked great, though.

I think she let herself down.

kitnkaboodle · 12/01/2017 23:58

On Piers Morgan she said that she had a demure mother of the groom outfit (hence the white hat), but when she saw the number of paparazzi she changed so as to make some sort of ironic statement Confused

OP posts:
NeedsAsockamnesty · 13/01/2017 00:01

She has not got her tits out in that picture.

It's a fairly regular dress neck style

perfumedlife · 13/01/2017 00:04

I didn't see her on Graham Norton but she looks fab as mother of the groom and why the hell would a woman have to hide her beauty just because her son was getting married? She isn't flashing flesh, she just looks fab.

CaraAspen · 13/01/2017 00:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Formerpigwrestler9 · 13/01/2017 00:15

she looks pretty damn good, great genes and bone structure obviously but she's had work done of course, it looks great

I cant see what's revolting, unless you find the idea of someone looking youthful at 76 inherently revolting?

ThumbWitchesAbroad · 13/01/2017 00:15

"why the hell would a woman have to hide her beauty just because her son was getting married?"

She shouldn't - but on the other hand, she shouldn't wear a dress that grabs everyone's attention and completely upstage her DIL-to-be on her wedding day, that's just bloody rude.

TinklyLittleLaugh · 13/01/2017 00:15

So was her "demure mother of the groom" outfit white to match the hat then? DiL would've loved that even more I expect.

kitnkaboodle · 13/01/2017 00:22

I guess so! I know it sounds bitchy, but I don't think the bride's outfit is all that great! That headdress ...

OP posts:
pigsDOfly · 13/01/2017 00:24

So is 49 years old the age at which a woman qualifies as an 'old bat' these days CaraAspen; as pp pointed out, that's how old she was when that photo was taken.

Agree her dress was inappropriate, but revolting?

BitOutOfPractice · 13/01/2017 00:29

I think the work she's had done looks awful. Like a mask. And she usually wears a wig by the looks of it.

So I'd say she's just looking her actual age, but With work done.

To be absolutely agog at Raquel Welch's appearance
BitOutOfPractice · 13/01/2017 00:31

I don't think the work she's had done is great. It's awful. Like a mask. And it looks like she usually wears a wig.

So I think she just looks her age, but with work

To be absolutely agog at Raquel Welch's appearance
LittleIda · 13/01/2017 00:31

The bride's outfit probably didn't look dated 27 years ago though.

BitOutOfPractice · 13/01/2017 00:31

Sorry about the double post. It said it had failed first time

pigsDOfly · 13/01/2017 00:36

Looks as if she's had a lot of work done, several times; her mouth has that look that gives the impression it's been lifted so many times it won't close properly.

Looks like Barbie's granny.

TaraCarter · 13/01/2017 00:43

She looked absolutely fantastic at that wedding, if that photo upthread is anything to go by. I'm 20 years younger and I would love to look that good.

That said, I don't think it was suitable as a mother-of-the-groom outfit, no. Even if she wasn't trying to upstage the bride, she looked like she was.

Formerpigwrestler9 · 13/01/2017 00:44

ok, pigsDOfly and BitOutOfPractice you find her aesthetically unappealing
fair enough

but why the vitriol? it's as if you feel personally insulted by her appearance

BitOutOfPractice · 13/01/2017 00:52

There was no vitriol in my post. And I never even said whether I thought she looks good or not. I said she'd had a lot of work done and wears a wig and that she just looks her age. Where is the vitriol there? I wish I had her looks. But I don't think she's looking like she does now because of good genes as has been stated here.

Other posters have been much more vitriolic about her calling her an old bag and a disgrace. Not me though.

BitOfFun · 13/01/2017 00:59

She looked absolutely amazing on the Piers Morgan interview, surgery notwithstanding. I just wonder why she feels the need to cling to her beauty so desperately- it's not like she's still got much of a career. She came across as extremely narcissistic. I found myself thinking about our Joan Collins, famously well-preserved but hardly in the same league as far as defying the march of time- Joan still gets my vote for somebody I'd enjoy being at a dinner party with though, and she's a far more entertaining interviewee.