I think this US broadcast journalist asked the questions I would have liked to ask:
Here
FWIW I think Samantha is extremely naive and inexperienced as a journalist if she didn't realise the effect that a story like this would have, tbh. I was never a hot shot journalist, only did the job rather hand to mouth for a few years whilst teaching, but I can't imagine in a month of Sundays writing something like this completely unaware of the potential for disaster and embarrassment.
She also lost the opportunity of making a valid point - the focus is now on her narcisissm rather than the valid issue of people being got at because they are conventionally more attractive than average, due to some genetic fluke.
This will either begin or end her career. It will be interesting to see which happens.