to think that this self absorbed woman actually isn't that attractive???

[RachelHRD]

Ugly on the inside and the outside......

They didn't devote nearly enough time to her. She'd be fun interviewed by Matthew Wright...

I remember that too, gaf

Can anyone find the shitstorm thread?

I thought it got deleted?

Startters - you remember it well enough to think it got deleted? I deffo can't seem to find it

Hmm. This is definitely shifty. Bloody DM .

I like this decective work, though.

Now you mention it that thread rings a bell.

I think it did, got v bunfighty. Pity, would MNHQ remember?

Would that have been trolling, then? Was that why it got deleted?

Just read the para below in the Independent & feel violently ill at the thought of the DM making so much money from this/all of us suckers who clicked through to their website.

Taking all ad revenues into account, pundits estimate the Mail may have picked up £100,000 from the tumultuous exposure.

oh & this too

We didn't used to have so specific a term for how the Daily Mail operates, but now we do: it's trolling. The internet is full of trolls, lurking on messageboards and in the "comments" sections, leaving little titbits of poison for others to become enraged by and react to. Normally they come out in response to an article, but this time Samantha Brick trolled us all first, and we trolled her right back. And the newspaper raked in the cash.

www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/harriet-walker-roll-up-roll-up-the-samantha-brick-saga-shows-that-womanbaiting-is-back-in-fashion-7619128.html

£100k? Did the poor sod even get a 1% cut do you think?

The Indy article is worth reading. Makes me hate the DM even more.

Post - I happens a lot on here. They use us a lot, I suspect. I've noticed this kind of poster more and more

gafhyb, does that mean that RachelHRD is not a genuine MNer, but someone trolling on behalf of the DM & we all rose to the bait?

Oh, I didn't mean that, and I couldn't possibly comment. I actually was speaking more generally about AIBU.

Coming late to this thread - personal opinion is she is OK to look but that's all.

But, having looked at the stills of the "This Morning" interview, her skin really ages her - would have said she was over 50 if I just saw the neck and mouth area.

Well, at least a fair few of us blame the Daily Mail and all who sail in her.

That's something, I suppose.

Has this been posted yet?

theguardian/lifeandstyle/2012/apr/04/samantha-brick-hated-good-looks

apps.facebook.com/theguardian/lifeandstyle/2012/apr/04/samantha-brick-hated-good-looks

Oooh! Oooh! STOP PRESS !!!! Am I the first with this news? Katie Hopkins is on Sky News talking about this and she has just said, and I quote:

'We don't all have to be fat and frumpy sitting around in our pyjamas picking spaghetti hoops up off the floor, like those women on Mumsnet.'

PMSL at the high and mighty and ever so important Katie who?

jif - perfect touche. Love it.

I love Katie Hopkins esp when ranting about mn
because you knw what for a lot of folk she's spot on
I mean folk on mn who post they go to telco in pj/rollers/slippers and love loose women at lunchtime

aye, Katie Hopkins is funny

sm - they are in the minority though, shurely? The majority are high powered career bitches who'd sooner poke their eye out with a shitty stick than go to a sports day