Influx of far-right posters

[Slightyamusedandsilly]

Why has the site suddenly had an influx of far-right posters? Almost overnight.

Is this a concerted campaign by the black shirts from Dover, Reform or Tommy ten names to infiltrate women's SM?

What were talking about then?

This post. Who are you referring to?

Anyone who criticises Labour for having had only white male leaders, while also criticising the concept of EDI. If it matters enough to be something to criticise then it should matter enough to be supportive of measures to monitor and address any issues. Which is all EDI is.

attendees at top public schools

There are attendees at top public schools, but also people who shine at top public schools. Rishi Sunak was head boy at his top public school, gained a first-class degree from Oxford, then won a prestigious post-graduate scholarship to Stanford in the US. Boris Johnson won an academic scholarship to Eton, was a captain of school, ran Eton's debating society and later became president of the Oxford Union's debating society.

there would be fewer millionaires and billionaires

Successful businesspeople are an asset in government.

I would argue that the Conservatives only tinkered around the edges of self-ID. It was the Labour Party who published actual manifesto pledges -

2019 UK general election party manifesto commitments on GRA reform

Conservatives:
No reference to reform of the Gender Recognition Act.

Labour:
“Labour is committed to reforming the Gender Recognition Act 2004 to introduce self-declaration for transgender people.”

https://murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2019/11/28/2019-uk-general-election-party-manifesto-commitments-on-gra-reform/

2017
Let trans people self-identify their gender, Corbyn urges May...

“Discrimination has gone on too long. The Gender Recognition Act does not allow trans people to self-identify their gender and forces them to undergo invasive medical tests. This is wrong,” he said.

“Labour recognised this in our manifesto, pledging to update the act. Theresa May told Pink News that ‘changes need to be made’ but failed to include anything on this in the Conservative manifesto.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jul/19/let-trans-people-self-identify-gender-corbyn-urges-may

So like I’ve been saying from the off on MN - the UK generally are elitist rather than racist.

Or is it people pointing out the party obsessed with appearing to be the natural choice for us BAME have never had anyone remotely BAME or female.

The jokers offered up by the Labour Party BAME in comparison to the BAME of the Conservatives is also telling.

Abbott who can’t do maths, is always wheeled out, even when the rotund hypocrite makes speeches about fee paying schools yet sent her son to said fee paying school. Then we have Kemi, Super, Super Kem!

Labour haven't had a female leader but their numbers of MPs and cabinet ministers are around the 50% point which reflects the population. Their numbers of non white MPs are also representative. Obviously its disappointing that given this, no woman or person of colour has achieved the leadership position.
Badenoch has strengths certainly. She is articulate and an arresting performer. She says very little with which I agree, but I find myself drawn to listening to her nonetheless. She is a strong choice to lead your party.

There are two distinct legal challenges here:

16 Jan 2023
Rishi Sunak’s government has blocked legislation passed by the Scottish parliament that would make Scotland the first part of the UK to introduce a self-identification system for people who want to change gender.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/16/rishi-sunak-blocks-scotlands-gender-recognition-legislation
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-64260502
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/dec/08/scottish-court-rules-uk-government-veto-of-gender-recognition-bill-lawful

April 2025
Judges at the Supreme Court have unanimously ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law...

The court sided with campaign group For Women Scotland, which brought a case against the Scottish government arguing that sex-based protections for women should only apply to those that are born female.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg7pqzk47zo

Who?

PP doesn't understand that a merit based approach to 'hiring', or recruitment as we call it here in the UK, is the point of EDI (or DEI as he probably calls it) rather than an alternative. Charlie Kirk was an American who didn't understand this either.
I think the misunderstanding comes from too much focus on US politics and the projection of them onto the UK, for one reason or another.
We see the same with certain posters referencing CRT, as though it's a thing here when in the UK it's very niche and largely rejected as a concept.

Look at those horribly intimidating far right women in Piddington.

The peace loving tree hugging Green Party have been so horrifically misogynistic that women leave but not much coverage on that. The leader can also register to vote under two different names, looking forward to that expose coming soon, oh wait…

Labour Party talking about feminism and equality go to events where women are either separated or not allowed to attend.

Think I’ll have to stick it out being far right with Kemi.

Are you referring to 11 years ago when a Labour event included the option of a single sex space for women in a venue?
Or perhaps to 2025 when trans 'women' (biological men) were not included in the women's conference?

Ask Stella Creasy.

She has attended events where Muslim people are separated by sex but these were not 'Labour party events'.
Do you have examples of the Labour Party organising events that excluded biological women as you claimed?

did you not read my post? I said where the Labour Party (inferred members) GO to events did I say where they organised.

some ‘proud feminist’.

This is what all the shills do start playing semantics so they can deflect. Enjoy your weekend.

Ah so we've reached the call me names and flounce stage already have we? That seems rather rude and over reactive of you when all I've done is politely question your comments.
Pity as I'd have been interested on your opinion on single sex schools, and the segregation of students on the grounds of sex, and exclusion of girls from boys schools, had you been able to keep your anger under control. Never mind. Enjoy yours too.

Leafy Piddington Lib Dem women. I bet many on here using far right would be similar.

Hey thanks for telling me what I do or do not understand. I was merely pointing out that merit based hiring is a talking point recently more associated with the right wing than the left.

yes, a fair few of those would be in our far right thug club.

The left are in trouble.

All they really have left is the indoctrination of the kids to try stay afloat. Eventually the kids grow up and grow out of things.

And I was merely pointing out your error in believing that people who support EDI don't also believe in merit based 'hiring'. EDI tries to ensure people are recruited on merit without disadvantage or discrimination holding them back.
What the late Mr Kirk had to say on the subject is somewhat moot as far as I'm concerned, given I'm not an American.

Well as you dont know my views on EDI, the error is yours.

Your post implied that you see 'merit based hiring' as different from recruitment that takes into account EDI. Most people who have positive views of EDI know it actually drives merit based recruitment.