Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Will I get in trouble with the school?

193 replies

wanderingtopographer · 04/09/2026 12:37

DS13 has been ill this week with a bad cold and has had 4 days absence. Nothing serious enough for the GP but in bed for the duration with Calpol and feeling generally unwell - I've also caught it and am feeling rubbish so it's clearly contagious. I have called the school every morning to keep them updated. For what it's worth, He performs very well academically and his behaviour at school is excellent so there are no other causes for concern.

I was on the sofa in my PJs when there was a knock on the door and two people from the attendance team were on the doorstep to do what they called a welfare check. I told them what i had said before - he's tucked up poorly in bed. They then asked if he could come down or put his head out of the window!

I was quite taken aback, as well as being slightly out of it, and said that no, he is poorly in bed, I am his mum and that feels like a big overstep on their part. I didn't raise my voice and said it politely but it feels absolutely wrong to have him forced to present himself as proof when he is feeling ill and not even dressed. We have never had any issues with the school that I think could warrant them disbelieving me or being otherwise concerned about his welfare - he is a nice, happy, well adjusted kid who happens to have a stinking cold!

They didn't push the matter and went away, but am now worried that it will be a mark against my name or they will raise it in school. Does anyone know if they will take this further?

OP posts:
HoChiMince · 04/09/2026 18:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Gaiged · 04/09/2026 18:24

KilkennyCats · 04/09/2026 18:18

Fgs, it was the child’s own mother who said he had a cold!
She can probably distinguish it from flu or covid perfectly well.

How can she distinguish unless she’s tested for either? Flu and covid can both range from asymptomatic to lethal!

AmnesiacsDream · 04/09/2026 18:24

KilkennyCats · 04/09/2026 18:20

What are you on about? Why should he “benefit”?

In terms of something being in his best interests, he would need to benefit in order to balance the negative impact of disturbed sleep and recovery. (Not to mention just the off feeling of being made to get up to wave at people when he's sick. It's not just OP who would probably find this intrusive).

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2026 18:26

The school is doing its job and it's annoying. But children fall through the cracks so we should all grit our teeth and co-operate, just as we do when we go through security in airports.

Divebar2021 · 04/09/2026 18:26

AmnesiacsDream · 04/09/2026 18:24

In terms of something being in his best interests, he would need to benefit in order to balance the negative impact of disturbed sleep and recovery. (Not to mention just the off feeling of being made to get up to wave at people when he's sick. It's not just OP who would probably find this intrusive).

Who said he was asleep ? He could have been up there on his iPad / gaming system. OP didn’t get him to show himself because she was affronted not because he was too ill to move.

KilkennyCats · 04/09/2026 18:27

AmnesiacsDream · 04/09/2026 18:24

In terms of something being in his best interests, he would need to benefit in order to balance the negative impact of disturbed sleep and recovery. (Not to mention just the off feeling of being made to get up to wave at people when he's sick. It's not just OP who would probably find this intrusive).

Oh, give over. He’s four days into a cold, hardly at death’s door.

BCBird · 04/09/2026 18:27

They are not targeting ur son, this woukd be the same for anyone. It's their responsibility to check- safeguarding issue. They were only asking for him to show his face to show he is okish

CurlewKate · 04/09/2026 18:28

If I was a welfare officer, I would be a little concerned by a healthy 13 year old spending 4 days in bed with a cold. Isn’t that a bit excessive?

CurlewKate · 04/09/2026 18:30

Particularly if after 4 days he was still so ill that he would be negatively impacted by sticking his head out the door for 30 seconds.

Ap42 · 04/09/2026 18:30

Its a safeguarding thing, don't take it personally. Their obligated to pay these visits and honestly they probably hate them as much as parents do!
Put it out of your mind and rest up.

Mischance · 04/09/2026 18:33

Safeguarding is important but so is balance. If this were a child with previous school problems - poor attendance, low attainment, bad behaviour in class, arriving at school unfed and scruffy then a visit might have made sense. But wasting resources in this situation is not sensible, unless of course there are things that the OP is not saying.

I feel the same about health visitors who plague the lives of stable well-functioning families whose babies are thriving, leaving insufficient resources for families where real problems abound.

AmnesiacsDream · 04/09/2026 18:33

Divebar2021 · 04/09/2026 18:26

Who said he was asleep ? He could have been up there on his iPad / gaming system. OP didn’t get him to show himself because she was affronted not because he was too ill to move.

He could have been (if he has that in his room) but to find out, OP would have had to disturb him.

I wouldn't get my DC to show themselves in that situation even if I knew they were awake because I don't think teaching them it's normal for people you don't know well and aren't good friends with to rock up and ask you to wave at them when you're in your PJs is a good life lesson. I'd have a boundary around that and I'm pretty sure they'd be mortified too.

Umbcord · 04/09/2026 18:33

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

LiuBei · 04/09/2026 18:35

Emupls · 04/09/2026 17:11

If this wasn’t about child safeguarding, I may be more inclined to get my knickers in a twist

This seems naive to me. If you say "we have freedom, unless there is a safeguarding issue" then authorities will just find a way to tie whatever it is they wanted to do to safeguarding. Rights need to be defended extremely vigorously.

AmnesiacsDream · 04/09/2026 18:36

KilkennyCats · 04/09/2026 18:27

Oh, give over. He’s four days into a cold, hardly at death’s door.

No one said he was at deaths door. But being disturbed when you're recovering is unpleasent even when you're not.

AgileMentor · 04/09/2026 18:36

HelpMeGetThrough · 04/09/2026 12:48

I wouldn’t bother about it. If they’d asked me to do the same I’d have told them to bugger off.

And yet you’re probably one of those who moan when a child dies or is abused and no one checked on them. You aren’t superior because you wouldn’t get your child to poke their head out the window you just sound like a massive twat

Umbcord · 04/09/2026 18:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

KilkennyCats · 04/09/2026 18:45

Mischance · 04/09/2026 18:33

Safeguarding is important but so is balance. If this were a child with previous school problems - poor attendance, low attainment, bad behaviour in class, arriving at school unfed and scruffy then a visit might have made sense. But wasting resources in this situation is not sensible, unless of course there are things that the OP is not saying.

I feel the same about health visitors who plague the lives of stable well-functioning families whose babies are thriving, leaving insufficient resources for families where real problems abound.

Who are these health visitors, who plague the lives of people who don’t need their input?

NeverDropYourMooncup · 04/09/2026 18:45

concertinacornflake · 04/09/2026 17:35

So you seriously think that a teacher should knock on the door of any family where their child is ill for four days? What would seeing a child's face at the window tell you?
You think that would be better for child protection outcomes than properly staffed children's services?

It would prove they were there, they were alive and they didn't have a black eye and a split lip, for a start. And that they weren't unattended or you were off your tits on smack.

If they then don't get an answer, that's a reason to refer on for a welfare check, as it's not an efficient use of resources to send the Police for nothing.

LiuBei · 04/09/2026 18:45

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I think creating common knowledge that this kind of intrusion is disliked is an important part of fighting this, unless you're suggesting physically assaulting council workers.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 04/09/2026 18:45

concertinacornflake · 04/09/2026 17:35

So you seriously think that a teacher should knock on the door of any family where their child is ill for four days? What would seeing a child's face at the window tell you?
You think that would be better for child protection outcomes than properly staffed children's services?

It would prove they were there, they were alive and they didn't have a black eye and a split lip, for a start. And that they weren't unattended or you were off your tits on smack.

If they then don't get an answer, that's a reason to refer on for a welfare check, as it's not an efficient use of resources to send the Police for nothing.

Umbcord · 04/09/2026 18:48

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

AgileMentor · 04/09/2026 18:51

NeverDropYourMooncup · 04/09/2026 18:45

It would prove they were there, they were alive and they didn't have a black eye and a split lip, for a start. And that they weren't unattended or you were off your tits on smack.

If they then don't get an answer, that's a reason to refer on for a welfare check, as it's not an efficient use of resources to send the Police for nothing.

Nice to see someone on here with some bloody common sense!

ImthatBoleyngirl · 04/09/2026 19:04

Easterchicken · 04/09/2026 15:27

There must be some prior concerns if they are already coming around checking if he is absent

He could literally have just said hi to them and shown his face but I'm afraid to say you denying that has probably exasperated the situation

Both DD and DS' schools have a policy where if the child is off for more than 3 days they have to either do a video call or a visit. It doesn't mean they have prior concerns.

wanderingtopographer · 04/09/2026 19:08

Wow this thread has blown up.

You are welcome to your opinions on whether he is really that sick or if there is more to this situation, as I am welcome to feel that I know what is best for my own child, but ultimately, we are all strangers on the internet, eh?

I've had a nap and feel less anxious about what was essentially a polite exchange followed up by a similarly polite email.

Thank you, and good night!

(flounces wheezily)

OP posts: