I find it interesting how different news folk cover the same story. When I saw your post my first thought was "archeology", and that is what I searched for with this. I got this CNN article
Trump administration plows ahead with groundbreaking for ‘triumphal arch’ | CNN Politics
"But first, an assessment of how the arch impacts historic and cultural sites – known as a Section 106 review, a key requirement under the National Historic Preservation Act – must be completed."
Politico appear to be looking at the project from a disruption angle, CNN more of a law and heritage angle.
I side with the CNN way, being a "Time Team" fan. And here is a link to the section 106 review stuff
Section 106 Review: The Ultimate Guide to Protecting America's Historic Places (uslawexplained.com)
"Imagine a new federal highway is planned to be built a few miles from your town. The construction company is ready, the funding is approved, and the bulldozers are warming up. But then, work stops. Someone points out that the planned route goes directly through the ruins of an 18th-century settlement and crosses a riverbank considered sacred by a local Native American tribe. What happens now? This exact scenario is why the Section 106 review process exists. Think of it as America's mandatory “pause button” for progress. Before any federal agency can fund, license, or approve a project—from a new cell tower to a massive dam—it must stop and consider what that project might do to our nation's historical, archaeological, and cultural heritage. It's a legally required conversation, not a veto. Its goal is to ensure that we don't accidentally erase our past while building our future. For you, the average citizen, it is the single most powerful tool you have to make your voice heard when a piece of history you care about is at risk."
I am not against progress. Far from it. But as we all know, the UK lost so much Archeology and heritage in the post war modernization drive that the lessons learned worldwide on that should not be forgotten. And the US does have those lessons in their own law.
And Trump just tramples all over it.