But you can Google to understand that
‘ The framing of Armenians committing "terrorism" in Azerbaijan is largely rooted in the protracted, decades-long geopolitical conflict over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region. The narrative depends heavily on which side of the conflict the actions and actors are viewed from.
Armenian Perspective: Defense, Self-Determination, and Resistance
For Armenians, actions taken in and around the region are often framed as a struggle for survival, historical self-determination, and resistance against perceived aggression.
Following Azerbaijan's decisive military operations in late 2023, the vast majority of the Armenian population fled Nagorno-Karabakh. The few remaining individuals, along with political prisoners and prisoners of war detained by Baku, are often tried or labeled by Azerbaijan as "terrorists" or "saboteurs." Armenians argue these charges are politically motivated and represent a continuation of human rights abuses.
Azerbaijani Perspective: Counter-Terrorism and Territorial Integrity
Conversely, the Azerbaijani government classifies armed resistance, unauthorized incursions, and civilian attacks (such as historical bombings or border skirmishes) as acts of terrorism aimed at undermining its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Azerbaijan frequently cites the use of landmines, cross-border shootings, and past militant acts by Armenian nationalist groups (such as the ASALA attacks in the 1970s and 80s) as evidence of terrorism. Azerbaijan also accuses the Armenian diaspora of funding and facilitating these militant activities.
International Context
While both nations have levied terrorism and human rights accusations against one another at international bodies like the UN and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the broader international community generally views the conflict as a territorial and geopolitical dispute rather than one defined strictly by terrorism.’
!!! Trauma then …..again
thanks for highlighting another example