What? No point? I don’t think you have read Entitled. Your information is out of date.
I can’t believe people are letting her off on this thread because she had a difficult upbringing! So have lots of people and they haven’t resorted to using people in the cynical way that Fergie has!
First of all, Lownie says there is evidence that SF borrowed £2 million pounds from Epstein.
And we don’t know exactly what he got in return from her for that money? That alone needs investigating imho.
Also, there is the small matter of her writing to support a convicted paedophile, and allowing her daughters to associate with him, long after she claims to have cut ties with Epstein, all the while writing children’s books and working with charities who help trafficked women to launder her image! Do you not think that gross hypocrisy is worth worrying about?
There is also the matter of her using the Duchess of York title, along with transport and police protection in some cases funded by the tax payer, long after she divorced Andrew. For holidays and so-called charity missions. So what people have been accusing Meghan of doing; Fergie has been doing quite blatantly for thirty years!
SF did raise money for charities but in certain incidences the charities did not receive the promised funds, or the split between monies raised and expenses were very murky.
Lownie also says that Sarah is quite a manipulative figure who has hinted about writing a memoir of her life in order to get around the NDA that she had to sign after her divorce. This is why she is unpopular with certain members of the RF.
Lownie also described her “sick cynicism” and “exploitative” nature in that she would borrow money and clothes ruthlessly, from people who were rich and poor, even servants, on the grounds that she would repay what was given, and then failed to do so; eg SF allegedly borrowed £100,000 from the Dowager Duchess of Marlborough to pay for a party in the South of France and only paid £5k back saying she thought that the rest was a gift!
Even worse she failed to pay newsagents and hairdressers and failed to return borrowed dresses from designers in multiple occasions. Lownie rightly points out that this pattern is cynical exploitation not just forgetfulness or lack of organisation. It’s far, far worse than just being “hopeless” with money! SF deliberately used her position and title to take advantage of others.
´
Lastly, Lownie states in one of his recent interviews that he believes that there are grounds for criminal investigations in to the financial activities of both S and A. He says he has information that he couldn’t put in the book for legal reasons that he is willing to supply to the national crime agency.
SF’s name crops up in a High Court case where PA and Ferguson were named regarding payments linked to a Turkish businessman, Selman Turk. The case involves a Turkish heiress who claims Turk defrauded her of millions of pounds and used a portion of that money to make "gift" payments to the Duke of York and his ex-wife.
So SF’s role in that needs investigating.
As does her role in the Gate Ventures collapse?
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2020/mar/13/shareholder-defrauded-firm-linked-to-sarah-ferguson-court-told
To say Sarah was simply “silly” and a victim of her circumstances is naïve and wrong!