The legal team will already be on top of which cases are important for setting precedent. We need those rulings, not out of court settlements. I think that if you decline an out of court offer but then win and aren't awarded more than the settlement offer, you're liable for all costs, which can easily exceed the award. (Happy to be corrected.) If that's the case, the fund will mean women can push for the case to be heard when that's necessary to get the precedent ruling without having to weigh up whether a win could still ruin them.
Agree with this. I think they will be looking to support targeted cases affecting schools, hospitals, HE, prisons, unions, gyms, Local authorities, job loss due to GC beliefs, high profile places such as HOC toilets Hampstead ponds, etc. Success in these areas will help bring all the places into line which were “confused about the law”.