Stonewall taking the EHRC to the UN

[Cuck00soup]

Being discussed on radio 4 soon.

Seems SW and the Good Law Project are trying to remove the independence of the EHRC. At least in part it seems due to their intervention in Scotland.

Interview with SW coming up in the next hour

For fuck sake.

Proper tantrums.

The absolute outrage because of a minor consideration of women.

I'm aware I may have some bias in this, but how transparent is this?! The EHRC offers some common sense proposals, and ideologists go ape-shit. I've already seen terms such as 'hateful' and 'dangerous' thrown at the EHRC, and the blue/green-haired masses climbing aboard like it's the last train out of the city after a heavy Friday night. Clear as day, surely?

Very clear Thumpsquids.

Ah, the UN. That well known defender of human rights that holds Saudi Arabia and China to account for their horrific human rights record.

Oh, wait…..

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-60331962 covered here too, I don't use the bbc much but DH alerted me

According to Stonewall, an organisation that does not submit instantly to their demands, or that expresses any concerns for safeguarding or for any conflict of rights, no longer meet the criteria of a national human rights institution.

Unbelievable
Foot-stamping toddlers

Hahahahahahaha

My they ARE cross

Idiots

And on ehose authority will this be forced?

Lets hand over the sovereignty of the ECHR to the UN.

I'm sure there will be a few politicians who will have something to say to that.

I suspect a few would then consider leaving the ECHR instead if it happened (and i very sincerely doubt it will)

Hot air from fuckwits.

It’s on now with Justin

Lol @ SW complaining about the EHRC being “excessively influenced” (because that’s not at all what SW are trying to do with their own aggressive lobbying!)

Clowns.

This actually really concerns me as we know that the UN are completely captured

On Radio 4 now.

Thanks for the heads up, just listening in now.

She is a weasel.

But I thought people were who they said they were? No Kelly?

Gosh, she is disingenuous.

Can't bear to listen to her - the false equivalence with gay people being allowed to adopt 🙄

Justin is great. He managed to shoehorn in several issues that are obviously pressing but which she dodged.

No idea what the relevance of “my wife is just dropping off our kids at school” had - just sidestepped the questions.

Justin was great. He is across all the issues and all Nancy could do want obfuscate with her Dolores Umbridge voice.

Yeah she had nothing to say re. Male sex offenders and I don’t see what trans people being bus drivers has to do with it.

So as a lesbian - she can’t see any worries or concerns? She has kids - she would have no worries at all should know of them tell her that they want surgery and drugs? Or if she has daughters - not one second of concern for her safety and dignity on single sex facilities?

I mean, come on…

"Isn't it really that you just don't like the new setup?"

Ah!

I wonder how many are bus drivers in comparison to, say, managing DV centres, running girls clubs or working as trauma councillors for rape victims?

Did he mention that the previous head had something to do with stonewall?