Woman accessed child abuse images from hospital bed

[KayakingOnDown]

Haven't seen a thread on this.

Julie Marshall looked at some of her 80,000 child abuse images while recovering from a heart attack. Presumably on a women's or mixed ward.

Julie Marshall admitted three counts of making indecent images of children. 677 of the images downloaded were of the category A, most serious, type.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-lancashire-53410019?__twitter_impression=true

Except it's not a woman at all.

80k??!!!! I have over 8k photos on my phone and it's overwhelming

This is insane.........

Man accessed child abuse images from hospital bed and later decided to identify as a woman

Oh for gods sake, again? SHE???

These are not our crimes!

There've been several threads on this story. John doesn't have a GRC, is legally male, and was referred to as male in court. The BBC has no excuse, other than hating and trying to provoke feminists.

John doesn't have a GRC, is legally male, and was referred to as male in court. The BBC has no excuse, other than hating and trying to provoke feminists

The BBC is going the way of the Guardian.

It's agenda-driven and untrustworthy.

It's no longer reporting the truth and it's alienating lots of people, not just women I imagine. People aren't stupid.

The Lancs Live Facebook page readers are certainly quite sure this vile specimen is male.

They are not a woman, ffs!!! Marshall's crimes are a mans crimes, and that's what Marshall is. Vile specimen. And a man.

I knew it was a man.

Yep not a woman at all. Not even legally. Disgusting pos ought to be put to sleep accessing material like that

The photo is clearly of a man. I may be wrong but I think that I read on another thread that journalists are directed to having to use whatever a person sats that they identify as in their writing.

He said Marshall's "mental health issues have been of a long-standing nature", adding: "I do not go into the detail of them, but they have run from adolescence to adult life."

No kidding.

There should be a law passed to stop the media describing male criminals as female.

But this literally never happens!! 🤷‍♀️

I've emailed the BBC to let them know of their mistake. Bet they won't change it though.

twitter.com/AlessandraAster/status/1235974138675814403/photo/1

Let me guess.. she has a heavy jaw and suprising big hands?

IPSO guidelines do say that journalists are supposed to refer to a person by their preferred identity. The BBC is regulated by OFCOM, however - though I think if you have a complaint you're supposed to address it to the BBC first and then only go to OFCOM if you're unhappy. So possibly worth a complaint.

If statistics record those crimes as having been committed by a woman that is an absolute disgrace

I knew before I looked and saw the picture of the sick fuck that it wouldn't have actually been a woman.

What name will she sign the sex offenders register with?

www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-bbc-failed-the-facts-over-a-crime-concerning-gender-identity

Women eh? What will they get up to next- amirite??!!

I’ve just emailed them asking why they did this, who made the decision and who I can complain to.

I won’t hold my breath.

If the offender was referred to as male in court - found guilty and convicted! - then there is absolutely no reason at all why the BBC or any other media should lie and misgender this person. It takes gaslighting to a whole other level.

I consider the mis-reporting of this to be aiding and abetting paedophile.

What a disgusting bunch they are.

Lancashire live website are referring to Marshall as a woman. www.lancs.live/news/lancashire-news/blackpool-woman-accessed-sick-child-18593766

Fucking BBC.