Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Targeted reporting of LGB social media accounts

77 replies

MrsSnippyPants · 18/02/2020 18:02

These people have no shame.
Maybe we should start reporting accounts that only advocate for other issues? Dogs Trust because they don't help cats? Age concern because they don't care about children?

Targeted reporting of LGB social media accounts
OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
mindtheclegs · 18/02/2020 19:11

I saw that too. Might be a good idea to give these LGB groups forming across all parties some bipartisan support. There are no safe spaces for them anymore. I'm straight but this is so very wrong.

MrsSnippyPants · 18/02/2020 19:14

They are saying these accounts were all set up by the same people at the same time, which I know is not true as I know the person behind one of the accounts.
This is quite simply the reaction of an abusive person; you have left me, so nobody else can have you.

Targeted reporting of LGB social media accounts
OP posts:
MrsSnippyPants · 19/02/2020 14:26

@LGBConservatives has been suspended today after what is clearly targeted reporting.
Haven't checked the others yet.

OP posts:
EverardDigby · 19/02/2020 14:30

Miranda's FB pages reports them all taken down.

MrsSnippyPants · 19/02/2020 14:35

I have no idea who set up the other accounts, but I know who set up the Conservative one and despite people on Twitter saying they were all set up by the same person this is NOT TRUE.
It is quite simply a pile on by TRAs who cannot bear the thought of LGB people advocating for themselves.
Thank goodness for LGB Alliance.

OP posts:
Deliriumoftheendless · 19/02/2020 16:29

It must be great to find ironclad protection to continue bullying those you take against.

not2daysanta · 19/02/2020 16:34

Well they were all setup by the same person on the same day, falsely claiming party affiliation.

It seems like a cut-and-dry case to me. Or is your position that even if that's the case, that it's perfectly acceptable behaviour?

not2daysanta · 19/02/2020 16:45

@MrsSnippyPants, you say it's not true but the evidence speaks for itself.

twitter.com/sineadactually/status/1229847551861567494?s=20

AnyOldSpartabix · 19/02/2020 16:53

The evidence isn’t conclusive. It might well be a member of each party who is affiliated with LGB Alliance.

Or it might be a troll.

Either way, typical super-reporting from the super-paranoid.

not2daysanta · 19/02/2020 16:55

So you're saying that it's just a coincidence that all of the accounts were setup by lg**********@g.com on the same day @AnyOldSpartabix*?

MrsSnippyPants · 19/02/2020 17:01

I don't see any evidence there at all not2day and please don't @ me, I'm on the thread.

Do you want to try posting what you think is evidence again? This time with actual evidence?

OP posts:
not2daysanta · 19/02/2020 17:03

I've led the horse to water. The rest is up to you chicken.

ANewCreation · 19/02/2020 17:05

They are not the same as each has a slightly different number of asterisks before the @

AnyOldSpartabix · 19/02/2020 17:06

Please don’t @ me either not2day.

And no, I didn’t suggest it was coincidence. I stated that it might be several separate people all connected with the LGB Alliance.

MrsSnippyPants · 19/02/2020 17:10

No, you are the one not2day saying there is evidence but you have failed to provide it.

And don't fucking patronise me chicken

OP posts:
not2daysanta · 19/02/2020 17:12

You're very hostile.

donquixotedelamancha · 19/02/2020 17:16

Or it might be a troll.

If it's a troll, or even someone lying about being a party member, then obviously the accounts should be deleted. We should not accuse people without proof.

So you're saying that it's just a coincidence that all of the accounts were setup by lgg*.com on the same day

Even on the thread you link it's been pointed out that the emails are different lengths.

Starting emails for LGB groups with LG and using the largest mail provider on the planet is hardly evidence is hardly evidence.

Do you have any proof that they were set up on the same day?

You're very hostile.

You accused her of lying about knowing one of these account holders.

not2daysanta · 19/02/2020 17:17

You accused her of lying about knowing one of these account holders.

What?

donquixotedelamancha · 19/02/2020 17:20

What?

OP knows the Tory account holder to be genuine. If your statements are true then she is lying.

What is the basis for you saying they have been set up on the same day please?

not2daysanta · 19/02/2020 17:23

OP knows the Tory account holder to be genuine. If your statements are true then she is lying.

Your arms must be tired from reaching. That doesn't equate to a direct accusation that she's lying about knowing the person who created one of the accounts.

The conservative account was created a month before the others. You can check @AllianceLGB's Twitter feed for evidence of that.

It's entirely feasible that it wasn't removed from Twitter's platform until a month later when another half dozen accounts claiming party affiliation suddenly appeared.

MrsSnippyPants · 19/02/2020 17:27

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

not2daysanta · 19/02/2020 17:30

You really are very hostile, MrsSnippyPants.

I don't see a reason to continue engaging with you, seeing as you're intent on accusations and fowl language.

FloralBunting · 19/02/2020 17:32

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Datun · 19/02/2020 17:33

fowl language.

🙄

unwashedanddazed · 19/02/2020 17:34

Did the accounts actually claim affiliation to the respective parties? Or was it just implied?

Labour_trans is not affiliated, yet it's not being reported as false or some kind of underhand attempt to take the T away from the rest of Labour LGB.

I'm unsure what the issue is with these accounts, or why they've been shut down.

Swipe left for the next trending thread