Apart from anything else waxing male and female genitals are different skills and need different training.....
^This.
I still don't get what these law cases are supposedly about. Is it fussing about someone advertising as waxing for women only, so about the pov that some women have penises and therefore to be non discriminatory all practitioners MUST be qualified in both if they state they wax women only? So basically a trades description accusation answered by waxers specifying the genital type qualified for?
Or since there is the line by some TW that they have a vagina like any other women, just an 'outie' one shaped like a penis and scrotum (that needs waxing exactly like a penis and scrotum) anyone claiming to wax vaginas only must in fact be trained to wax in both ways to avoid upsetting anyone? Despite the fact this will be enacting a lie for many who do not believe male genitals are in fact a vagina if the owner says so?
It can't possibly be compulsory for women to have to train in and provide male genital waxing as well as female genital waxing, people are free to train in and offer what ever specific services they choose, and obviously cant do something they are not trained in and lack the equipment to do. ( I'll leave aside the fact that many female beauticians and other forms of holistic therapists like massage etc work alone out of their own homes and do not take male clients, for obvious reasons, since that elicits howls of TWAW which will never be abused except for all the times it has been, and sexual assault isn't a risk, is nothing to be afraid of anyway and just be put up with anyway for the sake of poor TW because that's too batshit to engage with.)
So what is the beef here?
There really is a point at which other people start having rights too.