Times article - Fur flies over ‘Brazilian’ wax for trans woman Jessica Yaniv

[EweSurname]

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/fur-flies-over-brazilian-wax-for-trans-woman-jessica-yaniv-gm7f9mltx

Yaniv has made mainstream media publication and isn't anonymous in this one!

Amazing that it discusses how Yaniv was the reason Meghan Murphy was banned.

Why on earth should [Yaniv] be able to force women to touch [Yaniv's] balls for fucks sake.

Because Yaniv is a transwoman, and refusal to wax a transwoman's testicles could be discrimination based on gender identity.
Well done Canada, we're not far behind you.

Why did my comments get deleted?

Did you mention sanpro?

I did not mention sanpro. I alluded to some of the information on the links posted above which had screen shots of comments Yaniv made about pre teen girls and their bodies/periods - I can't see why it isn't allowed. I didn't make the comments, Yaniv did.

It seems to me that the law is now getting to the stage where any woman can be compelled by law to handle a man's dick as long as they claim to be a woman. Touch this person's cock and submit to their every whim or you will go to prison. Gosh what a step forward for society.

Anyway maybe I will go and comment on the Times page as their moderators seem a bit more accepting.

It's a sad day when Mumsnet discriminates against women in favour of men. Talk about propping up the patriarchy.

You said he.

Ie correctly sexed but misgendered

Anyway maybe I will go and comment on the Times page as their moderators seem a bit more accepting.

Good luck with that - none of my posts got through.

I thought he went by both he and she? Depending on what its about.

It's a sad day when Mumsnet discriminates against women in favour of men. Talk about propping up the patriarchy.

Yup. The transgender stuff is very good at making people do just that. Just use Yaniv. Mumsnet has been targeted relentlessly by transactivists, and now deletes any post which "misgenders".

Nice that we can say Yaniv now though - at one point that was a deletable offence

Ma’amsNet!

Fekko

The article omits so many very important facts re Yaniv and his apparent ‘interests’.
Fortunately a great many of the commentators seem to be aware of them and have very helpfully posted them.

I wonder how long it will be until / if they are deleted?

The comments are fantasttic, anyone who reads them cannot fail to be made aware of Yaniv's proclivities. Bravo to The Times for allowing them to stand (so far).....

An important point with the ball-waxing-human-rights-complaint is that Yaniv only followed up and threatened women who said "no" to the request. Salons that were willing to do the treatment were ignored. Yaniv never wanted the Brazilian, it was always all about the money.

How very subtle.

The name is placed in the public domain. There's a creepy photograph. Mentions that it's not thought that Y has had genital surgery and Y required a brazilian wax to the genital area. Now suing beauticians for refusing to accept a booking. .

Readers don't need much more to make the contrast between
Meghan Murphy's position and Y's.

That's not a creepy photograph. That's Jessica's own photograph from their crowdfunding page for their Beauty Pageant Entry.

www.gofundme.com/f/jessica-for-miss-bc

Jessica has raised enough for an entry fee plus $50. I would imagine that if JY fails to raise enough to cover all the other expenses that they won't enter.

Jessica is in with a real chance. Stunna.

That's not a creepy photograph. That's Jessica's own photograph from their crowdfunding page for their Beauty Pageant Entry.

They’re not mutually exclusive.

Insisting it's some kind of "right" to have your balls waxed because you're a woman is not mutually exclusive with, at the same time, using your bizarre philosophy to scam people.

I think it's all tied together by the need to humiliate and control women. (I don't think this drive is exclusive to Yaniv though Yaniv is pretty much the Platonic form of it.)

I have to wonder if there's some sick kind of pleasure being derived in being so repugnant on every dimension, it must increase the thrill entailed in forcing women to swallow down their disgust and "accept" JY as a woman.

It can't possibly be compulsory for women to have to train in and provide male genital waxing as well as female genital waxing

This is precisely what Morgane Ogre was advocating for when they adopted JY as a pet cause. Ogre has since recanted their support for Yaniv, after calling up some of Yaniv's young female victims and recording conversations with them.

Would JY sue if someone ripped the skin off their lady parts? How would that work? Presumably they would have to display pictures of their damaged lady parts with medical evidence of that. Would insurance pay out? Either the insurance is for biological parts or self declared parts.

I will take one for the team by offering to do his intimate wax. (Snaps on marigolds and super-heats a bucket of wax...)

Trouble is he doesn't want it done by a woman who wants to do it and is qualified to. No fun in that.

He wants to punish women who have boundaries.