Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

We NEED to speak out about this person

93 replies

pombear · 20/12/2018 23:56

For me, this is exactly why our conversation in the UK is so important right now.

Benjamin questions what his responsibility, and whether he can speak out.

Benjamin's film demonstrates the tangle that Canada has got itself in.

To the extent that the person that Benjamin speaks about feels OK to stand in front of their City Council and brag about their action against Megan Murphy, despite their own despicable and extremely concerning online behaviour.

twitter.com/BenjaminABoyce/status/1075827530702049280

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
HandsOffMyRights · 21/12/2018 00:08

It scares the shit out of me that we could go the way of Canada.

That vile fetishists are given so much control.

Bad enough what happened to Glinner with a similar character, but this individual is on a mission.

HandsOffMyRights · 21/12/2018 00:13

As somebody says on Twitter, this is a safeguarding issue. Are the Canadian authorities not bothered about the safety of girls?

TallulahWaitingInTheRain · 21/12/2018 00:27

When people who are advising governments on matters which bear on safeguarding have histories of sexual offending, or have had allegations of sexually inappropriate behaviour towards women or girls made against them, this is a matter of public interest and should be reported.

I can think of 4 or 5 recent examples without even trying.

GirlDownUnder · 21/12/2018 00:33

Excellent video, thanks for sharing pombear

But how does JY have so much reach? How have they got to site admin to remove content and ban people?

That’s what scares me - the reach so many within the TRA seem to have.

ScipioAfricanus · 21/12/2018 00:46

In that person’s address to the City Council, the phrase used is ‘the LGBTQ and trans community’ - I see that the trans part of the community is so important that it has to be mentioned twice.

I cannot* believe that someone would have the audacity to suggest that a woman should be prosecuted while the evidence is out there of disturbing behaviour by the accuser towards girls aged 10. Would you not want at the very least to keep your head down?

(*obviusly I very much can believe it. I’m believing 10 impossible things before breakfast on the regular thanks to TRAs and the decision of judges and police to minimise threats to the safety and lives of women)

DandelionsAreNotLions · 21/12/2018 01:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Vegilante · 21/12/2018 01:35

I was going to start a thread about this video earlier today, but I held back because I feared my snide comments would be censured & taken down for not being sufficiently respectful to The Person We Need To Discuss But Aren't Allowed To Because Trans Tyranny. Here's the recap of the video I originally wrote:

Benjamin Boyce recently has made several long videos with trans women that have struck me as insufficiently probing & skeptical... But at 7 minutes long, this succinct video is surefire peak-trans material, particularly as Boyce provides plenty of evidence of The Canadian Who Can't Be Named's public history of saying he's a woman - & a menstruating one with heavy periods, to boot - in order to indulge his fantasies of accessing female changing rooms & loos in hopes of seeing girls' & women's tits & vaginas "hanging out" & helping 10-12 year-old girls use tampons.

Boyce even gets in that the owner of The Balls That Must Be Waxed By Women also reviews sex toys online. Of one particular vibrating dildo he wrote, "I put in my purse and whip it out whenever I need some vaginal stimulation in the middle of the day..." If only those mean women who do waxing had known that, I bet they all would've said, "Sure thing, bruv! C'mon over right away!" Especially if the purse in question turned out to be gold lamé.

At the end is also mind-boggling brand-new footage/audio from a December 10 Vancouver city council meeting where The One With Hairy Man Bits Who Needs Lotsa Vag Stim is shown (dressed in a red cassock, no less) at the podium bragging about getting Megan Murphy banned from Twitter (& GC blogs removed from WordPress), then demanding that the government prosecute Murphy for the "hate crimes" she has committed (which consist of saying that trans women are men & men can't become women).

According to the new rules followed & imposed by both social media & the MSM today, this person with a long history of lying in the service of his creepy fetishes can go to a public forum, introduce himself by name (his real last name & the female nickname/middle name he occasionally uses along with his legal male name), make damaging, perhaps libelous false allegations about another person, & boast about shutting down speech by women he disagrees with ... But on Twitter, Wordpress & most everywhere else now he himself is exempt from being named, accurately described, or held to account for his own actions, past & present, in any medium or platform.

Boyce points out, correctly, that this person's lies & behaviour constitute a danger to girls & women - & that social media platforms & the MSM are increasing that danger by enforcing ridiculous rules against "misgendering", "deadnaming" & "causing possible offense to trans people (the horror, the horror!)" that in effect protect him from all scrutiny & criticism. So please Mumsnet don't remove this for calling Jonathan Yaniv what he is!

Hope that before this video disappears some meme/GIF-makers have a field day with the image of The Canadian Who Misrepresents His Dick As A Vag in his fetching red robes. What was he thinking? Handmaid's Tale? Melania Trump's Christmas trees? College of Cardinals? Laydee in Red? Red Riding Hood? Or maybe he had to wear red because it was one of those heavy menstrual flow days he spoke about on social media, when he'd be forced to change his pads constantly, preferably in the company of some 10-12 year-old girls...

DandelionsAreNotLions · 21/12/2018 03:42

I really really hope people read this young woman's history of involvement with this creep

mobile.twitter.com/L_ou_ise/status/1061395533141606402

As plain old male Johnathan Y he got himself into controlling a girlband's face book page, he could then communicate in private message with all the teen and pre-teen fans. Just imagine.
He volunteered to "help out" as loads of porny offensive messages were posted and he told the band that he was a whizz and could delete them and stop them being hacked again. Hmmm I wonder who put those messages there in the first place?

He shouldn't be on any town council discussing tampon machines in school toilets. He has a toilet and period fetish that concentrates on girls between 10 and 12. And the British Colombia court decided he needs his reputation and trans status protected FFS

DandelionsAreNotLions · 21/12/2018 03:43

This is the link.

mobile.twitter.com/L_ou_ise/status/1061395533141606402

Thingybob · 21/12/2018 03:44

When and how did such odd-balls (I'm being polite) obtain so much power?

Yeahnahyeah · 21/12/2018 03:49

AAARRRRRGGGGGGG!!!!!!

that's all.

DandelionsAreNotLions · 21/12/2018 03:53

THIS is why we need to talk about this person

✨Louise ✨
✨Louise ✨

@Louise
·
11 Nov
grown women. This person has used their status of privilege to blackmail children and pressure them into sending pictures of themselves. This person has gotten close to up and coming artists in order to prey on them AND on their gullible fanbases. And now this person is utilising

QueenSock · 21/12/2018 04:26

So, if he's still got his dick and balls, which need waxing, WHERE is he putting his 'vaginal stimulator?'

Deliriumoftheendless · 21/12/2018 06:11

Is this the right side of history we need to be on?

Please can one of our delightful TRA visitors please explain this one to me. I can’t see the virtue in protecting someone who is so clearly a danger to girls and women.

OrchidInTheSun · 21/12/2018 07:10

It's all in his head Queen. He's just getting a kick out of imagining it.

EJennings · 21/12/2018 07:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BlindYeo · 21/12/2018 08:05

Vag stimulation in the middle of the day when you're out and about?? Who the fuck does that? That's precisely why we don't want this in our toilets. God, the thought of some pervert whipping his todger out in the female loos for a state sanctioned tug - and us all being called transphobes for not accepting this.

HumourlessFeminist · 21/12/2018 08:27

Oh, that's a great video, it's definitely worth a watch / share.

Floisme · 21/12/2018 08:51

It’s not so long ago that TRAs were on here telling us, ‘Look at Canada - they’ve got self ID and there haven’t been any problems’.

‘Hmm’ is all I am going to say.

Yeahnahyeah · 21/12/2018 09:13

EJennings. Yup. But I think the whole clusterfuck is beyond political, beyond religion, beyond .... well... anything but common fecken sense.

fidgetspinner555 · 21/12/2018 09:53

If you read the comments on the video, someone has pointed out that the brand of tampon JY names is the only brand that doesn't have an applicator and must be inserted with fingers.

AngryAttackKittens · 21/12/2018 10:07

Look at Canada, eh? At this point I assume they must mean in this sort of way...

happydappy2 · 21/12/2018 11:15

Love Benjamins video-the person who can't be named should be imprisoned for being a predatory male with an unhealthy interest in young girls-sicko.

FleetsumNJetsum · 21/12/2018 11:17

I was discussing The Person We Need To Discuss But Aren't Allowed To Because "I'm Trans And Oppression and Shit" with my DH, who thought that The Person We Need To Discuss But Aren't Allowed To Because "I'm Trans And Oppression and Shit" only did that speech in front of Langley council in order to get it on public record. Now that it is on public record The Person We Need To Discuss...etc can approach public bodies saying, "it is on public record that Megan Murphy is a trans exclusionary radical feminist who has committed hate speech and should be prosecuted".

and

me: how is it The Person We Need To Discuss...etc is not prosecuted???

DH: The Person We Need To Discuss...etc has not been found guilty of a crime.

me: Duh, clearly a paedophile, evidence on social media, clearly a vexatious litigator, evidence with human rights tribunal.

Pause while I work it out because I have a lady brain,

me: ...oh, I get it...those were only crimes against WOMEN. Right.

DH: I don't make the rules.

YetAnotherSpartacus · 21/12/2018 12:51

Re the ball waxing. I think there is a missed opportunity here. Any dudes unemployed right now, or looking for a change of career? Train as a beautician and specialise in mankini waxing. Offer your services on a contract basis such that if a determined customer DEMANDS that a salon offer waxing (or other) services for clients with cocks and balls you are on your way down the motorway sirens blazing and lights flashing to BE THERE! Uniform should be hight vis gear or overalls and stubble is mandatory. Belching and farting in the presence of the client is highly regarded. Best approach is to scratch one's own balls whist saying 'all right then mate, a full wax was it? All good. I get ya - after all we're both the same underneath, haw, haw, haw. I hear you've nixed the anaesthetic - only joking mate - real men (or women) don't scream do we? Now drop them pants and let's get to it'.

The determined customer would run screaming even if the technician was consummately professional but obviously male - because we know that ball waxing isn't really the end goal here.