Ham pr disasters 64! …….Prince Charming…Prince Charming…..ridicule is nothing to be scared of ! …..

[jeffgoldblum]

A lack of humour and self reflection is not helping.

Oh I dunno, W seems to be getting on ok..

All makes complete sense, thank you! However. However.

And really we can't decide to talk about facts can we, they really are rare in anything to do with these two. From the tig published BS delivering turkeys happy families, to their Oprah interview, to the spare book to many other bs interviews. It is all a toxic quagmire - it is rather hard to tell none fake bits apart from what they say themselves, never mind reporting on them.

This is why I kind of lean more to more believing what her sister said a few years ago, rather than what thy say today..

Oh that's not the case. William is doing verrry nicely.

These picture remind me of David beckham queuing wearing a suit to see the queens coffin (or shamelessly begging for a knighthood)
Im so humble but everyone notice me.

How would you begin to unpick all of that? So many lies.

Harry is such a manipulative twerp

W is definitely in his prime!

Did anyone else see William giving Eugene Levy a tour of Windsor Castle? William was very unassuming, self effacing, quick and intelligent. He came across as a reflective person. He didn't slag anyone off (take note, bro, it is possible).
Also, very tall, slender and obviously in good shape!

Who are the crowds meeting Harry ?? My god, he thrives on publicity

Thanks for thread @jeffgoldblum I don’t know how you keep up with

Someone asked - maybe up thread or tail end of previous thread about the tie Harry wore.
It’s the Guards Household Division regimental tie. Here’s a picture of William wearing it a few years back. I think they both wear it from time to time.
It makes a change to see Harry dressed smartly.

I don’t agree with this. It depends whether you believe men who lose their hair are automatically unattractive- which I don’t.

I have a soft spot for KC. No one would argue that he’s ever been classically handsome but he’s still got something. His sons are both tall and slim and despite losing their Barnet much sooner than their father did (must be the Spencer gene? I think baldness comes through the mother’s line) are still attractive-esp William, but other opinions are available.

Also apparently the Brackley branch of the Royal British Legion put out a Facebook post and referred to him as Duchess of Sussex 😂 (She must have cornered the autocorrect algorithm 😉)
Also referred to him as HRH 😤
Maybe that letter from the Lord Chamberlain needs resending to the branch and to the RBL for avoidance of doubt.

Image taken off X as I don’t use facebook so no guarantees as to veracity.

I kind of lean more to more believing what her sister said a few years ago, rather than what they say today…

Samantha doesn’t look that reliable to me. She vigorously defended their father, who is obviously guilty.

Samantha doesn’t look that reliable to me. She vigorously defended their father, who is obviously guilty.

Did I miss a trial and a guilty verdict?

I've read that article and the timelines (the years stated) don't match as if she was born in 1981 then she wouldn't have been 18 in 1994 - she'd have been only 12 or 13 depending when in the year.

Edit: apologies I meant to quote the link to this news article -

https://www.earth-scope.com/2025/09/samantha-markles-explosive-revelation-meghans-secret-teenage-marriage-and-the-child-she-left-behind.html

? Not a great example

//the US Department of Justice (DoJ) … said Markle was arrested on a federal criminal complaint alleging he kept child sex abuse material, "including sexually explicit photographs of himself with prepubescent girls, in two Los Angeles-area storage units he rented for nearly two decades".//
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cwnv03203yvmt

Good point. I have no idea if Markle is guilty, but that's the point of having laws. Whatever a person is alleged to have done, they deserve a fair trial.

Oh arrested, that must mean he's guilty then. No need for that pesky business of a judicial process to decide guilt or innocence.

Or she is older than she says. As her ex school pals have alluded too. Yet more fuzzy facts. Anyway we're not going to get to the bottom of any of it on here, that's for sure! Can anyone?

@CoffeeCantata now I don’t object to a bald man - Stanley Tucci, anyone? - but I think the follicly challenged have to embrace it - no comb-overs or Action Man-style hair transplants or strange chrysanthemums perched on their bonces.

But come on now, KC in any way attractive? Nooooo!! I think Prince Philip was indeed a fox - or rather a wolf as he looked rather lupine - but he failed to pass on his looks.

Quite

HRH no longer in abeyance 😓

Come on – look at the evidence. There’s almost no chance he won’t be found guilty.

We haven't looked at the evidence, though. That's for a jury. You can't just decide if a person is guilty.
The lock up may not have been secure, the boxes could have been tampered with... I agree it doesn't look good, but the rule of law must apply.