Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Ham pr disasters 64! …….Prince Charming…Prince Charming…..ridicule is nothing to be scared of ! …..

849 replies

jeffgoldblum · 08/11/2026 15:52

adam ant 80s GIF

A lack of humour and self reflection is not helping.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 12:08

KilkennyCats · Yesterday 12:04

They were less stringent back in the day, it didn’t entirely depend on grades.
Toby Young got into Oxford with BBC grades, probably because of who his father was.

You could certainly get in based on what school you went to as well. I know someone who got in because his father was friends with the College Master. This person got lower grades than me.

Horses7 · Yesterday 12:12

KilkennyCats · Yesterday 12:04

They were less stringent back in the day, it didn’t entirely depend on grades.
Toby Young got into Oxford with BBC grades, probably because of who his father was.

Charles got a B and a C btw ….. and one was History ironically enough. The other was French.
Tbf he had such a miserable time at school it possibly affected his grades.

Rockyroadminibites · Yesterday 12:14

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 12:07

The situation was that a Cambridge education was thought to be a good plan for the then PoW. I don't know what grades he got. However, he went to Cambridge to further his education which I consider to be a good thing. What tremendous propaganda it would have been if his place had been at the expense of Roger from Wigan. That would have been utilised for the last 60 years, and certainly on these threads.

I agree. It is not as if anyone was saying ‘well we thought about making him king but decided he didn’t have the grades for it’. And Oxbridge’s teaching style was very different to your standard polytechnic - you don’t just sit in lectures, you have regular intensive 1:1 or 1:2 tutorials where you are asked questions and challenged on your thinking - something that would be very important for a future king.

IdaGlossop · Yesterday 12:15

KilkennyCats · Yesterday 12:04

They were less stringent back in the day, it didn’t entirely depend on grades.
Toby Young got into Oxford with BBC grades, probably because of who his father was.

Far fewer young people went to university when Charles went and Oxbridge had entrance exams - c.10%. Even in 1979, UCL offered me two EEs, the baseline for matriculation, because the English department then had its own entry process (a written submission on your reading to sift for invitation to interview, then a critical commentary test on unseen texts on the day of the interview). Presumably Charles had an interview of sorts just to check out that he would be up to the level of discussion needed.

readbutdonotpostoften · Yesterday 12:15

Anemonesandeucalyptus · Yesterday 11:27

The “Duchess” was photoshop. This is lifted from the genuine page. But the HRH was written by them.

I find those choice of words not great tbh - why mention he didn't make any special requests and use HRH? I expect the RBL may have had a "request" to include certain phrases in their reporting.

Happy for Harry to attend the event but do not believe in coincidences it was The Sun with the photographs. I also think it is perfectly possible for Harry to have attended an event and there be no photographs.

Announce in advance you are attending a "private" event, have a photographer from a tabloid newspaper which you are currently linked with, ensure those photos are printed alongside ones of KC and William at the Cenotaph - it all smells a little iffy to me!

Thanks @jeffgoldblum for the new thread.

Horses7 · Yesterday 12:15

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 12:08

You could certainly get in based on what school you went to as well. I know someone who got in because his father was friends with the College Master. This person got lower grades than me.

I know it’s never been a fair world and isn’t even now. Charles got much (much) lower grades than me and most likely much lower than Roger from Wigan too! 🤣

Handbagsandoldcurtains · Yesterday 12:18

IdaGlossop · Yesterday 11:47

I've just been catching up with Celebitchy's Royal 'coverage ', including Prince Harry's appearance yesterday. Below the line, I find a particularly ridiculous conspiracy theory: the appearance is part of the palace's bring back Harry plan, there is war looming in Europe, William is not up to the job, so William is going to be exiled using Kate's 'disappearance' as the reason, Harry is going to be installed as regent.

Yep, that all makes sense.

Oh that’s gloriously mad. And totally why I try my best to keep up with these threads.

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 12:18

Horses7 · Yesterday 12:15

I know it’s never been a fair world and isn’t even now. Charles got much (much) lower grades than me and most likely much lower than Roger from Wigan too! 🤣

That's not my point

MrsFinkelstein · Yesterday 12:19

Anemonesandeucalyptus · Yesterday 11:27

The “Duchess” was photoshop. This is lifted from the genuine page. But the HRH was written by them.

Or the OP just went back and edited - which is far more likely.

Thanks for new thread Jeff xx

MaturingCheeseball · Yesterday 12:20

In those days there were some reserved places for certain public schools at certain colleges. Why not if they provided an endowment I suppose. I can’t help thinking things have swung rather too far the other way now. And my dcs went to an ordinary comp so I’ve no skin in the public school game!

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 12:21

IdaGlossop · Yesterday 12:15

Far fewer young people went to university when Charles went and Oxbridge had entrance exams - c.10%. Even in 1979, UCL offered me two EEs, the baseline for matriculation, because the English department then had its own entry process (a written submission on your reading to sift for invitation to interview, then a critical commentary test on unseen texts on the day of the interview). Presumably Charles had an interview of sorts just to check out that he would be up to the level of discussion needed.

Yes, 1969 was a very different time for university entry! I went later, but only 8% of women went to university when I did. The set offers were baseline, confirmed by interview and school reference.

Rockyroadminibites · Yesterday 12:23

Horses7 · Yesterday 12:15

I know it’s never been a fair world and isn’t even now. Charles got much (much) lower grades than me and most likely much lower than Roger from Wigan too! 🤣

Neither you, nor Roger, were going to be king though. Rather odd to be complaining that the first in line to the throne is treated differently from Roger.

ElmBeechOak · Yesterday 12:24

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 10:21

There is a disconnect between being 'all for innocent until proven guilty', and stating of someone 'who is obviously guilty' before trial.

As I understand it, the law in the US remains as in the UK, which is that a person is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair trial.

With regard to contamination of evidence, that is a real concern, particularly in the case of the material in the Philippines.
What I would say is that the media do not always report everything that happens. Reading the DM account of the discovery of the lock-ups, I was struck by a rather disjointed timeline, with several disconnected times mentioned.
Given that the DM is renowned for having a very good legal department, I would not be surprised if the authorities were present when they first opened the lock-ups.

OK, maybe ‘obviously guilty’ is a touch strong. I will take it back and say ‘very probably guilty.’

I think two things are true:

  1. Everyone should have a fair trial
  2. There is very strong evidence against TMS, and if the case comes to trial, unless a convincing alternative explanation of that evidence emerges, he will be found guilty. (Barring a perverse jury decision - they do occur.)
IdaGlossop · Yesterday 12:27

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 12:21

Yes, 1969 was a very different time for university entry! I went later, but only 8% of women went to university when I did. The set offers were baseline, confirmed by interview and school reference.

I'd never thought about how many women went when I did in 1979. 6%. If only I had realised in 1979 that we were so few, I might have thought differently about what was possible afterwards!

Rockyroadminibites · Yesterday 12:27

ElmBeechOak · Yesterday 12:24

OK, maybe ‘obviously guilty’ is a touch strong. I will take it back and say ‘very probably guilty.’

I think two things are true:

  1. Everyone should have a fair trial
  2. There is very strong evidence against TMS, and if the case comes to trial, unless a convincing alternative explanation of that evidence emerges, he will be found guilty. (Barring a perverse jury decision - they do occur.)

There doesn’t need to be a convincing alternative explanation, there just needs to be reasonable doubt

JoanChitty · Yesterday 12:27

I rather like Charles. He is always impeccably dressed and exudes an air of old fashioned courtesy. Whether he writes his speeches himself or not, he delivers them well. He has various interests and seems to be well rounded.I think the late Queen was a hard act to follow but despite his health he’s doing well.So what if he loses his temper, I’d rather that than a sulker! I think he doesn’t suffer fools gladly.
I’d like to see HAM taken to task more firmly as I think they get away with too much, but the current position does seem to be working.
Charles is a quintessential British gentleman.

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 12:30

Rockyroadminibites · Yesterday 12:27

There doesn’t need to be a convincing alternative explanation, there just needs to be reasonable doubt

This ⬆️. It's the rule of law.
What happens in dictatorships and theocracies etc? They suspend the rule of law and the right to a fair trial.

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 12:31

IdaGlossop · Yesterday 12:27

I'd never thought about how many women went when I did in 1979. 6%. If only I had realised in 1979 that we were so few, I might have thought differently about what was possible afterwards!

Yes, a lot of people don't realise that most people were leaving school at 16.
People infantilise Diana as "a teenager" , but most young women her age would have been in work.

HilaryThorpe2 · Yesterday 12:32

You have to remember that the entrance exam counted for more than A levels for Oxbridge. I am a year younger than Charles and knew loads of people who had two E offers. Good rugby players especially.

notimagain · Yesterday 12:41

IdaGlossop · Yesterday 12:15

Far fewer young people went to university when Charles went and Oxbridge had entrance exams - c.10%. Even in 1979, UCL offered me two EEs, the baseline for matriculation, because the English department then had its own entry process (a written submission on your reading to sift for invitation to interview, then a critical commentary test on unseen texts on the day of the interview). Presumably Charles had an interview of sorts just to check out that he would be up to the level of discussion needed.

Agreed.

The past was another country etc,

As I recall it from the early 70's the one or two real stars from my six form who went to Oxbridge were heavily coached, then passed the entrance exams and interviews.

Their eventual A level grades were TBF also very good, though I suspect almost irrelevant.

Rhaidimiddim · Yesterday 12:42

Choux · Yesterday 08:16

Your memorial display sounds like a lovely tribute to your father. And it’s a private and meaningful tribute. I think what @Rhaidimiddim was referring to were people who have have a year round display for all the world to see eg their car bumper as a way of claiming to be a kind and thoughtful person and yet don’t seem to live their daily life like that eg the car would cut you up or steal a parking spot from under your nose.

Thanks.

We have a day when the nation solemnises remembrance, and there are symbols associated with that act of remembrance - the Tommy and the poppy.

Having a poppy on your car all year round is, to me, disrespectful.

And the Tommies outside Londis and on the A4 roundabout all year round cheapen the otherwise very powerful symbol of sacrifice. It is only a matter of time until someone crochets a Santa hat for the Tommies.

ChubbyCheeksCharlie · Yesterday 12:42

SqueakyDinosaur · Yesterday 11:30

I think his time in the Army was when Harry felt most at ease in the world, and, however he has behaved since and whatever choices he has made, I don't doubt his sincerity in wanting to pay his respects. He knew soldiers who were killed and badly injured.

I would be surprised if there's a repeat of the Disney premiere/Kardashian party thing instead of Remembrance activity - those very much have M's fingerprints on them to me.

Which means Harry has regained (in part) his balls?
Trouble afoot at home if he starts putting his foot down in other areas!

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 12:44

notimagain · Yesterday 12:41

Agreed.

The past was another country etc,

As I recall it from the early 70's the one or two real stars from my six form who went to Oxbridge were heavily coached, then passed the entrance exams and interviews.

Their eventual A level grades were TBF also very good, though I suspect almost irrelevant.

Yes, worth noting when you see all those posts about what a privileged generation some of us came from. University was only attainable for a minority, mostly men and mostly privately educated.

Rhaidimiddim · Yesterday 12:44

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · Yesterday 08:20

M (and H) in Aus, pissing off a nation who will vocalise their discontent with characteristic humour, could be very bad news for Royal Family PR.

Australian journalists don't pull their punches. Frank and outspoken, to put it politely.

The Australuan press overlooked the sexual assault by H on one of their lifeguards.

Starryfifty · Yesterday 12:45

ChubbyCheeksCharlie · Yesterday 12:42

Which means Harry has regained (in part) his balls?
Trouble afoot at home if he starts putting his foot down in other areas!

He wasn't invited to a celebrity party this year. If he was, HAM would have been there