Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry might be liable for £48m Costs

114 replies

Viviennemary · 29/07/2026 11:54

I just read Harry might be liable for £48m costs. No wonder he wanted to see Charles. Trouble is he's won most of his court cases up till now and has made a tidy sum out of them. He must be insured against this surely. And the others will be liable too. But I don't suppose any of them has £48m to spare.

OP posts:
Platypusdiver · 21/08/2026 05:07

his home has doubled in value in the 5 years he has owned it from $14m to almost $30m

Prince Harry's house in the US? Is this correct?

ShamedBySiri · 21/08/2026 06:18

Sorry if it’s already been mentioned but today’s the day. 2pm. 🍿🍿🍿

Harry might be liable for £48m Costs
Harry might be liable for £48m Costs
Allseeingallknowing · 21/08/2026 15:02

There’s enough rich people involved to take the sting out of the amount!

PullTheBricksDown · 21/08/2026 15:33

So the judgement seems to be that £9.5 million has to be paid, by the claimants collectively, in the next 7 days as the first step. Report here

www.dailymail.com/news/article-16067837/Prince-Harry-fellow-claimants-pay-millions-Daily-Mail-judge-rules-doomed-hacking-case.html

PullTheBricksDown · 21/08/2026 15:38

Taken from X as a summary

Mr Justice Nicklin has ordered the seven claimants (including Prince Harry) to pay Associated Newspapers’ costs on the indemnity basis — a significant step that removes the usual proportionality limit & resolves any doubt in ANL’s favor.

The Court found the way the claims were pleaded, pursued & maintained took the litigation “well outside the norm.”

An interim payment of £9.54 million must be made by 4pm on 28 August. Final recoverable costs (ANL’s bill stands at ~£34.5m) will be decided later by a Costs Judge if not agreed. Permission-to-appeal timetable also set.

A decisive ruling on both principle & payment. Full judgment & summary now available on the Judiciary website.

AnAutumnCrow · 21/08/2026 16:36

Platypusdiver · 21/08/2026 05:07

his home has doubled in value in the 5 years he has owned it from $14m to almost $30m

Prince Harry's house in the US? Is this correct?

There's speculation about who even owns that house, and what charges are on it.

Harry can't have much equity in it or he wouldn't be scurrying home to Pa.

KeepPumping · 21/08/2026 21:35

Viviennemary · 29/07/2026 11:54

I just read Harry might be liable for £48m costs. No wonder he wanted to see Charles. Trouble is he's won most of his court cases up till now and has made a tidy sum out of them. He must be insured against this surely. And the others will be liable too. But I don't suppose any of them has £48m to spare.

Elton John probably?

KeepPumping · 21/08/2026 21:37

Platypusdiver · 21/08/2026 05:07

his home has doubled in value in the 5 years he has owned it from $14m to almost $30m

Prince Harry's house in the US? Is this correct?

That is the EA (Realtor or whatever) valuation, it will be bollox.

RedToothBrush · 21/08/2026 22:36

They had insurance to cover up to £16.2m of Association Newspapers' costs in the event of losing the case - but Friday's ruling means the newspaper group could now try to recover up to the £34.5m that it said it had to spend to defend itself. This means the duke and others could face a bill of some £18m.

Source BBC news.

PullTheBricksDown · 21/08/2026 22:45

KeepPumping · 21/08/2026 21:35

Elton John probably?

He's got it all right, but he got cross when Harry turned up with his hand out and said 'I'm not an ATM' (lots of reports, Google it) So Harry's massive sense of entitlement may have put that particular source of cash out of reach.

caringcarer · 21/08/2026 23:01

Viviennemary · 29/07/2026 17:15

I agree. Charles shouldn't pay for spoilt brat Harry. Meghan will just need to make a few more jars of jam.

🤣🤣🤣

caringcarer · 21/08/2026 23:02

RedToothBrush · 21/08/2026 22:36

They had insurance to cover up to £16.2m of Association Newspapers' costs in the event of losing the case - but Friday's ruling means the newspaper group could now try to recover up to the £34.5m that it said it had to spend to defend itself. This means the duke and others could face a bill of some £18m.

Source BBC news.

Perhaps it will teach him a lesson.

Rhaidimiddim · 21/08/2026 23:10

PullTheBricksDown · 21/08/2026 22:45

He's got it all right, but he got cross when Harry turned up with his hand out and said 'I'm not an ATM' (lots of reports, Google it) So Harry's massive sense of entitlement may have put that particular source of cash out of reach.

My understanding is that EJ doesn't get a choice, if DM come after him for the joint- cost part of the bill. Happy to be told I'm wrong by people whose field this is.

IAmATorturedPoet · 22/08/2026 01:38

Does Harry pay for anything? Has he paid his RAVEC bill yet?
I think a lot of the time with him it’s not so much ‘can’t pay, won’t pay’ but ‘can pay, won’t pay’. Such is his level of entitlement.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page