Yet more revelations…….Ferguson and dodgy business contract.

[Zippedydodah]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy5q05v0q1xo

Yet another example of SF exploiting her ex-royal connections for £m

Sarah and Andrew as bad as each other - truly "fucking grifters"! Selling access for sleazy money.

It'll soon start to come out about the little Princesses as well...

I really hope the truth about Beatrice the ‘private equity analyst’, currently / very recently in the Middle East, does come out, and Eugenie too. We already know about their receipts of monies, gifted expensive jewellery and assets related to their parents’s activities. What else will emerge this week? It seems relentless.

They are women in their mid to late 30s, no longer ‘the York girls’. If they are shoddily grifting off styles and titles, then they should lose the styles and titles too, as did their beloved ‘best friend’ parents.

Grubby.

Good luck to the Pegasus investors getting their money back, if hairdressers and such go unpaid.

I think those two should lose their titles as well. Along with Harry and Meghan and Archie and Lilibut. They've exploited them long enough.

I do genuinely wonder if the Yorks might have previously given the Sussexes some piss poor advice about ‘utilising’ their styles and titles. It’s possible that they sold a vision of a dream lifestyle that Harry may well be regretting buying into, now it’s all unravelling for the Yorks in public.

Harry’s uncharacteristically quiet about the relatives that are the Yorks, other than to say recently of his uncle ‘oh, I didn’t hit him’. Yet, to justify his departure, he’s been vicious about his other close relatives. Odd man. Odd family all round.

I think that Beatrice and Eugenie are far from innocent where backhanders and lavish gifts, free exotic holidays etc are concerned, they’ve accepted £££££ for ridiculous reasons like a party for SF, diamond jewellery etc.
For not one second do I believe that they didn’t know what was going on with their parents’ dodgy contracts and acquaintances.
wonder just how much more is going to come to light.

God, it’s just awful what Andrew and Sarah got up to.

Beatrice and Eugenie seem to be right there in the thick of it with all the shady dealings of their parents. They can’t be that dumb they thought all these business introductions to questionable characters and the freebies associated with it, were because their parents are such stalwarts of the business community. I tend to think their days as Princesses are numbered, the whole family are tainted from their dodgy dealings off the back of their royal titles.

I read that article earlier and i agree it's getting harder to see Beatrice in particular as free from the taint of these dodgy deals. At this point there's is a danger the parents will drag the kids down with them.

I don’t believe, in her role as an anti trafficker campaigner, Eugenie has ever made a statement about the trafficked victims of Epstein and Maxwell?

She runs an anti slavery charity, and yet has never mentioned one of the biggest trafficking cases in recent times in which her parents and family friends are embroiled in, how do the trustees of her charity square that one away ! What about the donors?

I think her expenses from that charity would be interesting !

I think her expenses from that charity would be interesting !

I have posted this before and am quoting myself but it's well worth repeating:

Interestingly enough the 2023 accounts for the charity were 98 days late in filing and the 2024 accounts show the bulk of the expenditure going on some knees up gala night with the rest of the income/expenditure carried over to the next set of accounts.

Looking forward to seeing 'em 🙂

According to this article said knees up cost an eye watering £280K 😮

https://www.tatler.com/article/princess-eugenie-raises-pound1-million-for-the-anti-slavery-collective

Her charity has apparently made very few donations, despite having £1.3m in the bank.
I don’t understand why the daughters haven’t disowned AMW, I’m pretty sure I would have distanced myself from my family had they been as appalling as the Yorks.
I guess they see their sources of ££££ and gifts disappearing.

I think it would be hard for anyone to disown their parents, they must believe he didn’t have sex with her, while you would hope they would be embarrassed by their parents begging money from Epstein (and publicly lying about ending friendships), I do understand why they would believe their father over a stranger.

What I do find strange is their silence about Epstein and Maxwell, who they both had contact with and accepted gifts from, they should have made some statement about the trafficking of minors for prostitution, particularly Eugenie.

@CathyorClaire thanks for that link, @Zippedydodah the charity funding looks to be quite opaque, hopefully there will be a spotlight on that in the near future, although it is chicken feed in comparison the the rest of the shenanigans.

No. It's easy to disown your parents when you understand what they've got up to; who they have exploited and how they've got their wealth.
A decent person would do so.

.

How wealthy are Andrew and Sarah? Who knows? What did the Queen leave him? What debts has he got? And Sarah? This is the issue. They spend too much and don’t have real work. Andrew needed to have a proper role but ended up filing his time with murky friends. He’s just unbelievably stupid and was encouraged by the Queen to live up to his Royal status.

I think they need a couple more trustees, independent of the founders and their friend.

Also, it's the CEO who is supposed to be responsible for operational matters and the trustees for governance. So, if money is not being spent as it should, then questions need to be asked of the CEO or any of the numerous Directors she manages. They are a new start up to be fair, and it'll be interesting to see the next end of year accounts.

I agree. Why do most people/ media refer to these grown married mothers as ‘girls’
I cannot believe that if they were so close as they say to their parents, that they were not involved
They truly are an unlikeable and grubby group of people

You're right - I find it interesting how infantilised they are. They're 35 and 37. Not children.

They are a new start up to be fair

its not a new start up, it was founded in 2017 by Eugenie and her friend.

Sorry, I thought it just had two years accounts!

In that case it's pretty poor.

It was founded in 2017 but doesn't appear to have filed accounts until 2022 having (according to the website blurb) spent the intervening five years researching.

It appears to have spent approx double its £15k income in 2022 and most of its just shy of £50k income in 2023 but it's in 2024 things get interesting with a quantum leap in income to £1.57m yet minimal expenditure most of which would seem to have gone on the inaugural bash.

https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/5167794/full-print

On the face of it it looks like the apples haven't fallen far from the tree.

Uh oh......

Totally grubby

I bet the two ghastly daughters are just as bad.

Of course they are! They learnt from their parents. And Sarah was setting up endless charities and anything donated came to her as 'expenses'
She was fleecing people left right and the center and I don't doubt the daughters will be no different

Good point about the charities, she was forever setting them up. That rings alarm bells.

If people can face more revolting revelations, I’d really recommend Andrew Lownie’s book.