Tell Me Lies Tell Me Sweet Little Lies | Traitors 2026 | Thread 7 | Spoiler Free!

[CaveMum]

Link to previous thread: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/telly_addicts/5473255-whispers-in-the-confessional-traitors-2026-thread-6-spoiler-free?page=1

Welcome to Thread 7 of Traitors 2026.

This thread runs at TV pace so do not read any further if you are not up to date with the live broadcast. Whilst most discussion will be on the current series, inevitably people will refer to previous series/players/winners so reader beware if you’ve not seen the 3 previous editions, or the celebrity version.

While we welcome posters discussing their theories and speculating on relationships/connections between players, please don’t post spoilers from elsewhere that may ruin things for those of us who like to see things unfold over the course of the series.

The story so far (as at end of Ep 6):

Traitors
Hugo
Rachel
Stephen
Fiona (Secret Traitor)

Murdered
Netty
Ben
Maz
Reece

Banished
Judy (Faithful)
Hugo (Traitor)
Ross (Faithful)
Amanda (Faithful)
Fiona (Traitor)

This thread is starting mid-way through Episode 7, so goodness only knows what is going to happen in the Round Table Showdown that is brewing.

The floor is yours…

She's got such amazing skin. I think she uses lots of very expensive skincare.

There’s never any evidence though. It’s not like they have dna, witnesses or cctv

its always a guess and a gut feeling or circumstances

She planned and edited that speech and still had no actual evidence. She loses any credibility that her role as a barrister created. Hope she was better in court!

She’s not wrong.

Harriet basically did an Amanda, but did it publically. She assumed that the mere mention of her job would mean people would believe her. If traitors was that logical it wouldn't be a fun

Does anyone listen to the extra Uncloaked bit? I've never bothered.

Evidence in the traitors can only ever be circumstantial though, so whatever you come up with against your suspect is always going to sound lame compared to actual evidence in a court of law which is gathered in a completely different way.

I do but it rarely gives vital info

She can wear what she likes! People are so critical of what others are wearing .. if only we had images of what we’re all wearing ;)

Ah to be young…

Of course. Case’s dont go to court based on gut theories and he said, she said theories

🤣

Do you hear them opening the second envelope?

Uncloaked is explaining a lot of things – basically Harriet just lost stage it. She shouldn’t have told them in the chapel about her background, she absolutely shouldn’t have laid out her cards at breakfast. Rrally she should’ve waited another day before laying into Rachel at the round table just to freak Rachel out. She was playing a good game and suddenly the pressure got to her.

On another note Roxy is the dimmest ever

Can we stop going on about evidence

there is never ever ever going to be any real evidence in a game of traitors

Didn't Adam tell everyone he took a shield after denying it?

😂

Yes. Its funny I love it.

Agree with others that there were far too many shields, I'll be amazed if they don't get caught out by one with who they choose to murder

I think he only told his group?

It wasn’t even a theory. Rachel voted fur someone who turned out to be a faithful. So did plenty of others which is why they’ve lost so many! She built it up so much at breakfast, I was expecting something more coherent.

No

Surely whatever evidence Harriet thought she had evaporates when you realise she thought there were maybe 5-6 traitors?! How would that even work - did she think there were 7-8 to start with, or they recruited after Hugo or what?

Of course she can! But it was just such a contrast in style, season, category & pattern than what she normally wears. We'd only seen her in trousers and blouses and cardigans in solid colour blocks, usually with a scarf or shawl. Here she was in a sleeveless dress. And it didn't suit her as much.

I can’t believe they chose to murder. I really hope we get to find out what happens if they attempt to murder someone with a shield.

So…what do we think happens now :)??