The Traitors #3

[witchycat2]

Continued discussion for season 3 of The Traitors

Because either they won't believe her and will banish her, or they will and the Traitors will kill her for exposing their plan, discouraging future recruitment and fixing it so she won't get banished.

Well now I know!

We're over here! Thread 4

How many filler posts will I get in tonight before Mumsnet banishes me...

Thread 4, still not banished.

Thread 4, tentatively still here.

This is Linda, waving a Traitor sign and crying.

I don’t think you can do another 40

You're probably correct.

Is that because they prefer to last as long as possible to get exposure for a media career, rather than going home with the cash?

@dapsnotplimsolls will you manage to finish this one? 😂

😂

Haven’t RTFT as I’m still catch up with some of the end of episode 6 and don’t want to see spoilers but just on here to say again wow this cast are reaaally taking it personally aren’t they?

I haven’t watched a whole UK traitors from start to finish before so I don’t know if this is the norm but I’m finding this way more draining than the Australian one I just watched last week. And a bit toxic too!

It’s giving me bad vibes but I’ll probably carry on watching it as I’m a bit invested now but I won’t watch the UK traitors again if they’re always like this. The Australian seemed to understand more it is a bloody game.

Absolutely love Minah’s game, think she’s an absolute queen but she’s losing her crown a bit getting so ruffled over Dan, and being so outraged he lied despite the fact she’s lying to him. That said it’s maybe worked in her favour since he was going to be on to her very soon! He had figured out someone close to him was protecting him.

Linda’s acting at the breakfast table was hilarious 😭🤣 highlight of that episode lol it was the fact she thought she was so convincing but it made her look guilty

Just bumping this post

I agree that some of the comments are a bit harsh, and a bit silly to assume you know everything about someone from a VERY edited TV show - as audiences we should be fully aware of how unrealistic so called 'reality' tv can be now.

But why is it relevant that she has a young child - are you saying it would be fine to say nasty things about her if she was childfree?

Several of the contestants have young children, and tbh if anything older children would be 'worse' because they could hear comments in the playground or look online themselves and see what was being written about their parent. A 3 year old isn't going to have a clue!

Yeah I did follow up my post later, this thread moves very fast. Whether or not she has a child doesn’t make the comments more harsh and I wasn’t saying that. Mumsnet is usually people with young kids or came here with young kids. That’s why I mentioned it here, to do with the context of where the discussion. I wasn’t making a specific point about it, joining in the general chat that was relevant after Thursday’s episode.

Though I am finding it funny I’ve been asked a few times what’s the relevance of her being a mum on a website that has mumsnet emblazoned at the top

http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/telly_addicts/5249472-traitors-4-banish-murder-or-click

We're on 700+ posts into thread 4 if you want to come over and join us 😀

I’m over there, hope this thread isn’t still going when we start #5

But parental status is completely irrelevant to this particular TV show, surely? Other than Frankie being everyone’s mum

Yes irrelevant to the tv show, relevant to posts and comments made by people on a website called
mumsnet. I’m over explaining it now but I guess it is a way to fill up the thread. In my original post I was just mentioning it as detail, not really making a point about her having a child. The thread moves very fast and there was discussion about Livi after Thursday’s cliffhanger.

But you don’t need to be a parent to talk about The Traitors, or to post here? So I’m not seeing the relevance.

Bumpity bump. We're over heeeerrrrrre!

I know there was a fourth thread for the show but I'd find it weird and a bit creepy essentially continuing an argument about a specific point onto there, plus you can't quote onto a new thread.

I still don't understand what the relevance was or why there was any need to "mention as a detail" Liv's status as a mum but don't want to derail a new thread.

Maybe stop arguing with randoms on the Internet 🤔

Come join the fun on thread 4 (nearly 5).