In her article, she comes to the conclusion that "personal use of ChatGPT is not that bad for the environment" (compared to other things we do).
Not that bad. Compared to what? Flying in a private jet? Eating meat? Buying new clothes? Boiling the kettle?
Maybe it's not as bad as any of those, in terms of overconsumption of resources & environmental damage. They're all on a sliding scale though. Just because boiling a kettle several times a day may use more energy than an AI search, that doesn't mean that I should just cut back on hot drinks. I'm not keen on thoughtless use of AI either. It's all cumulative.
I'm not preaching against its use - it has its applications & I'm sure lots of people find it really useful. But I had a side role in my last company as sustainability advisor, as it's something I'm passionate about, & I try to consider as much as possible in my day-to-day life.
I think that people who use it for wardrobe advice etc are often feeling under-confident. The examples that people have posted on other threads show outfits that are well-enough put together - but there's nothing unexpected about them!! They're a bit dull & uncreative & beige, & I would feel stifled at the thought of being told what to wear by anyone - let alone AI!!
So I think my own objection to using it too much, is that it would obliterate so much of the fun I have playing around with clothes!!!