A lot of the 'issues' in our house are caused by the rigid access arrangements that my husbands ex insists on. The amount of access isn't a problem (alternate weekends, plus one night in the week) but we can't request a 'variation' unless we're literally out the country. Of course, the ex can change things any time she likes, but that's 'different'. (Don't get me started on that one!)
So even though step-son is 16 next month, our lives are dictated by the access pattern, if we want to arrange a weekend away, it's got to fit in with the schedule. Many of our friends who live with their bio children have more freedom than we do, simply because they don't have to fit their lives round a rota.
This all came to the boil a few days ago, when we were invited to a wedding of a close friend, at the other end of the country. We both want to attend, but it falls on an 'access' weekend, and my husband reluctant to rock the boat and 'mess up the schedule.' My argument, is that surely we shouldn't have to put 50% of our lives on hold on account of a 16 yr old???
The child himself isn't causing any problems, but does any one else think it's odd that we still have to stick to rigid arrangments when he's 16? If he was 8, then it might not be so good to disrupt his routine, but all this seems a bit insane to me.